inmunitas said:
Saelune said:
inmunitas said:
Dizchu said:
inmunitas said:
I think there is a big deference between a developer adding player freedom and Facebook being stupid.
Isn't it essentially the same thing though? Facebook allowed users more options. If you don't identify as a quad-gender demimasculine hyperboy, "male" and "female" still exist. Personally I'm fine with just "other" but that's me.
For one thing there are only two genders, "male" and "female", that is what the term "gender" refers to. Those other options are just "descriptors", some of which are arguably nonsensical.
I think you mean sex, ie genitals and how we work to reproduce. Gender is more a social construct than the biological one that the sexes are.
No, I mean gender. Sex only refers to biological anatomy, gender is basically everything else indirectly associated with ones sex, that is what is meant by "social construct". Example: modern western society associates dresses and the colour pink with the female sex, that association is socially constructed, there is no real reason why the male sex cannot where dresses or pink.
But if gender is everything socially constructed around sex, why can't that change? I mean, since we have separated physical biology from gender (with the sex gender distinction) all that leaves is the social construct, what is to stop us from expanding the concept of gender to include more than just two? I mean, these traits might be associated with sex still, like your pink/dress example, but they are ultimately still societal constructed traits, arbitrary lines humans have created to categorize things.
Basically, we drew the lines. Why can't we add another? Or a hundred others?