Perfect Dark 64 had a good solution to this: the knife was poisoned and would guarantee a kill, but it took about fifteen seconds to kill someone at full health, not to mention primary famage was pretty bad as well. You would usually only get one kill off of it, and the throwing range was crap, but the fact that the other person would almost certainly kill you was a major downside since stealth was hard.
Since when did a knife kill me more than a .50 cal
- Thread starter slipknot4
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Game dynamic, want more real? Join an army. Jeez these sorts of complaints piss me off, how about you get your sniper a little more powerfull and get their knifes nerfed and they roll in in their stealth bombers and tanks while you look for food because they have the money to be better equipped.
I disagree with you, with knives you actually have to get close enough to the bastard, as for a sniper you can pick guys off from across the map! Honestly if you have successfully gotten close enough to make the knife kill, you deserve it to be one stab.
personally, I love the knife. Its pretty satisfying when you land a kill, especially on one of your friends 
but I do want the knife to be abolished ):
anyone else miss playing COD2 for a few minutes and then halfway through something important, like trying to kill someone or leave a comment you hear the daunting sound of a rage-enducing, aggrevating, frustra-HUMILIATION!
but I do want the knife to be abolished ):
anyone else miss playing COD2 for a few minutes and then halfway through something important, like trying to kill someone or leave a comment you hear the daunting sound of a rage-enducing, aggrevating, frustra-HUMILIATION!
Just to pick this up: Grenades should have a good chance to be be fatal within a 10m radius. The modern M67 hand grenade is pretty much guaranteed fatal within 5m and guaranteed to wound within 15m, and they can be thrown 30m by the average soldier. It's only videogames that make you think they have all the explosive power of a gnat's fart.slipknot4 said:
Its just like how a back of a gun does more damage to the back of someone's head (helmet) then a 50. cal
JUGGERNAUT?! God dammit, I hate Juggernaut...Rutawitz said:
OT: I think the OHK from the knife is actually one of the better ideas I've seen in an FPS. Gone are the days of Halo's retarded rifle-butt fights. It's also an incredibly rewarding way to get back at your rival if you manage to knife them several times without them ever seeing you.
I don't think you can be killed "more" by any one thing. Once you are killed I don't think you can be killed "more" or "less."slipknot4 said:
But in any case I agree with what you're saying. While knifing someone is a greater risk to take, it should still have balanced damage. I mean if you get knifed in the throat or head then yes, I can see it being an instant kill.
Hax. I heard a quote once that said, "If Counter-Strike has taught me anything, it's that if someone's better than me, they're probably cheating."KaiRai said:
The Battlefield series is annoying with the whole knifing what not. You can be shooting them with assault rounds and they only have to prone and knife your legs. It should at least only be a one hit kill from chest high or from behind.
well it is what snipers get fr standing in on spot a whole game if the move once in a while mabey they wouldent get tracked by everyone