Skyrim Beaten In Just Over Two Hours

Recommended Videos

TheFPSisDead

New member
Jan 3, 2011
510
0
0
Grey Carter said:
Skyrim Beaten In Just Over Two Hours


One of Bethesda's QA testers has beaten the highly anticipated RPG in an impressive two hours and sixteen minutes.

To a given value of "beaten," of course. Presumably QA tester Sam Bernstein didn't see too much of Skyrim's verdant scenery as he scuttled from quest to quest in a bid to beat development team rep Jeff Browne to the end credits. Bernstein's final time was a lightning-fast 2:16:10 - twenty seconds faster than Browne's effort. The speed run competition was held to celebrate Skyrim's imminent launch and cheats were not allowed. Bernstein, who can be seen basking in the august rays of victory above, received a small trophy for his troubles as well as a pie of his choice, baked by director Todd Howard. Bernstein also won the speed run competition for Fallout 3 back when it launched, finishing the post-apocalyptic RPG with a final completion time of 75 minutes. Not bad.

Of course, regular gamers who haven't been playing Skyrim non-stop for the past year - or designing it for that matter - probably won't get through the game quite that fast. Bethesda has claimed it will take players around 30 hours to beat the game's central quest, not including the time it takes them to father (or mother) a dynasty of lizard children.

You can take your best shot at Bernstein's record when Skyrim launches on November 11th.

Source: Bethesda Blog [http://www.bethblog.com/gate.php?referer=%2Findex.php%2F2011%2F10%2F13%2Fjeff-vs-sam-ii-the-skyrim-speedrun%2F]



Permalink

Let me see someone beat Dark Souls in two hours... then i'd be impressed :p
 

TokenRupee

New member
Oct 2, 2010
126
0
0
Daaaah Whoosh said:
I don't understand how it's a good thing that he beat the game so fast. It's like someone getting an award for breaking a matress in two days. Sure, he was probably having sex with an elephant on it, but why would you buy a matress if you know it can get worn out in just two days?
Or as a friend of mine once said: "Talking about how fast you beat a game is like talking about how fast you are in bed."

I understand their reasoning for it, but how can that possibly be any fun? Competitive or not? I would rather just enjoy my time with it.
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,806
0
0
The most interesting part about this for me is that Todd Howard actually baked a pie for the winner. He got to pick the flavour as well!
Speedruns tell nothing about the game, though they can be fun for the ones doing it. And this one is about double what Oblivion was, so that's good news.
Oh, and I love all the people comparing it to Dark Souls, forgetting that 1: It's a speedrun, and 2: Dark Souls is more of an action game than an RPG.
 

ipop@you

New member
Oct 3, 2008
189
0
0
I can't decide whether to say 'Challenge Accepted' or not, hmm.
No I don't think I will, I've been waiting for this since Oblivion and I don't want to rush it.
 

Jimmy T. Malice

New member
Dec 28, 2010
796
0
0
RUINED FOREVAR LAWL

At least it's longer/harder to sequence break than Morrowind. There are videos of it being completed in 10 minutes.
 

ShindoL Shill

Truely we are the Our Avatars XI
Jul 11, 2011
21,802
0
0
moose49408 said:
Why would anyone try to beat the game that fast? Isn't the whole point of a Bethesda style game to explore the terrain, find hidden secret stories told through the environment and experience the rich expanse of side quests and adventures to be had that have nothing to do with the main quest? I put hundreds of hours into Oblivion, and I fully anticipate putting hundreds more into Skyrim. I mean I get the idea of a speed run, but with a game like this, that almost doesn't seem like an accomplishment.

EDIT: Or at the very least it defeats the purpose...
why? pie. pie's why.
but the point of the GAME is to see cool shit.
the point of this is to see how fast you can do it. also pie.

OT: well... good for him i s'pose.
 

HyenaThePirate

New member
Jan 8, 2009
1,412
0
0
What concerns me about this is it makes me suspect that once again the enemies abilities scale with your level. I'm not a fan of enemy scaling. I rather enjoy the feeling of grinding and eventually becoming a walking drizzt do'urden killing machine that fears nothing.
 

ReSpawn

New member
Feb 24, 2009
61
0
0
TheFPSisDead said:
Let me see someone beat Dark Souls in two hours... then i'd be impressed :p
Didn't someone in the thread already say that the record for that game was ~1hr?
 

C95J

I plan to live forever.
Apr 10, 2010
3,491
0
0
At least it's nice to know that, compared to his Fallout 3 speed run it is over an hour longer. It seems just yesterday I was waiting 3 months for Skyrim, now with less than a month to go, I actually can't wait :D
 

Keneth

New member
Oct 14, 2011
106
0
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWi6t8Psv9w

Demon's Souls can be beaten in less then an hour. Therefore, Skyrim will be better then Demon's Souls. Right?

Also, There is a one-on-one conversation between Todd Howard and Markus Persson. (AKA "Notch" Minecraft's creator) Todd mentions that the QA testers learn to speedrun the game so that they can get to certain parts of the game very quickly. They do this so that they can test weather certain bugs and glitches are still present in the newest iteration of the game.
 

Jnat

New member
Feb 1, 2010
269
0
0
At least they aren't lying about how long the game is, like saying call of duty is 8 hours or portal 2 being 9
 

Ashendarei

New member
Feb 10, 2009
237
0
0
Ugh ... Speed running through a game always bothers me for some reason. Hopefully they're trying to see just how much core content they have as a dipstick for time investment for power gamers?

no, nevermind that would be silly :D
 

Balls Mandingo

New member
Apr 15, 2009
55
0
0
xXxJessicaxXx said:
This. I have over 300 hours played in Oblivion and I've never finished the main quest
Exactly. Most of the content of RPGs is all in the miscellaneous side quests, sight seeing and just general screwing around
 

walrusaurus

New member
Mar 1, 2011
595
0
0
deth2munkies said:
Considering you can beat Oblivion in just over 10 minutes, I'm glad this is an improvement.
what? I know its damn short, but sitting through all the fast travel loading screens alone probably took that long.
 

baker80

New member
Oct 17, 2008
102
0
0
Maybe I'm alone in this, but conclusively proving that the main content of your new epic RPG can be beaten in less than two and a quarter hours is NOT something you should be this proud of. What are they trying to tell people? "Yeah, if you're looking for a good story, this is basically not worth it?" Great marketing right there.
 

Fajita

New member
May 27, 2010
17
0
0
baker80 said:
Maybe I'm alone in this, but conclusively proving that the main content of your new epic RPG can be beaten in less than two and a quarter hours is NOT something you should be this proud of. What are they trying to tell people? "Yeah, if you're looking for a good story, this is basically not worth it?" Great marketing right there.
I don't think anyone with half a brain cell thinks that, so no I don't think they are.
 

deth2munkies

New member
Jan 28, 2009
1,066
0
0
walrusaurus said:
deth2munkies said:
Considering you can beat Oblivion in just over 10 minutes, I'm glad this is an improvement.
what? I know its damn short, but sitting through all the fast travel loading screens alone probably took that long.
You run it at a certain speed that minimizes loading times, do a wall trick to skip some of the intro, fast travel to the cathedral as soon as you leave the tutorial, then use paintbrushes (or a jump bug like in the video) and wall glitches to jump over it, which automatically teleports you to the very end of the game.


video is here: