Giving ME3 way too much credit.jprf said:Ignoring the ending, ME3 was a spectacularly good game; probably one of my favourites of all time. Bioware is still a great developer and I will be watching DA3 with interest.
Two things that ME3 misses:
1.content - ME2 has quite alot of content and is a worthwhile sequel (in terms of content) to ME1. characters, dialogue and missions are in bulk. Majority of the content is optional however this is a good thing, it means that content isn't being shoved down our throats
2.exploration - ME1 and ME2 had new places to go. ME3? It seems like a slightly extended version of DA2. The sad thing is that they could've reused the same places as well tweaked slightly to show the effects of the war.
ME3 is good but by no means 'spectacular'.
Not really, this is a project from Zenimax [footnote]ZeniMax Online Studios[/footnote] and not Bethesda[footnote]Bethesda Games Studios (where console/single player Elder Scrolls and Fallout titles are developed) - Quoted from the official ZeniMax Online website[/footnote] directly.DRes82 said:Bethesda is doing the MMO thing now too, though. So, they could just wait around until that horrible idea drives Bethesda into the ground and if Bioware can manage to stay alive long enough with the tumorous growth that is SW:TOR attached to them., they will have no competition!Thoric485 said:I think that if SW:TOR enters 2013 with less than 500k subs, BioWare will be shut down and this won't see the light of day.
If TESO fails then no real big deal because it's a side project, a spin-off. The worst decision came from EA/Bioware to scrap KOTOR 3 in favour of a prequel MMO.