That was the first thing I thought of when I read the headline.Witty Name Here said:Oh... My... God... REALLY?!
Well I can't wait, I'd save as many children as I could from that horrible Orphan matron.
I'm usually very wary of this type of argument. Typically a feature that impacts the game's design or the user experience is construed as not impacting the game if you don't use it. In this case, I actually do feel safe in assuming my personal Skyrim experience will not be impacted if I simply ignore this optional feature.Irridium said:Oh no, you can adopt kids! How will we ever cope with this new, optional feature! That's gamer logic for you. If you have the option of doing something, you're forced to do it.
I doubt I'll use the feature, but hopefully those who want it have fun with it.
I'm probably not going to punch Todd Howard over it, but I don't like this feature. When I heard the details of marriage in Skyrim, I was like- "huh?" It's not bad exactly, just out of place. And now they are expending time and effort to expand the family concept, presumably to the exclusion of something I might like. I would prefer they spent that time expanding on the game's core appeal of exploring a fantasy world. I'm actually open to the possibility that marriage and whatever could be made to support that core appeal, but in their current form they don't. I'm not even sure why they're in the game at all. Maybe someone was trying to keep up with Fable, of all things.shrekfan246 said:Hah. As soon as I entered this thread, George Carlin's "Kids and Parents" routine started up on my media player.
"Something else I'm getting tired of, is all this stupid bullshit we have to listen to all the time about children. It's all you hear in this country: Children, help the children, what about the children? Save the children! You know what I say? Fuck the children. Fuck 'em. They're getting entirely too much attention. And I know what you're thinking: "Jesus, he's not going to attack children, is he?" Yes he is. He's going to attack children."
OT: Well, I stopped playing Skyrim a few months ago, moved on to other things, but it's... interesting? That they're including this. I don't see why there are people who are getting all aggressive about it though, not like it's going to be shoved in your face. Well, hopefully at least.
First, I like the "probably" that was thrown in there. It made me laugh.Rooster Cogburn said:I'm probably not going to punch Todd Howard over it, but I don't like this feature. When I heard the details of marriage in Skyrim, I was like- "huh?" It's not bad exactly, just out of place. And now they are expending time and effort to expand the family concept, presumably to the exclusion of something I might like. I would prefer they spent that time expanding on the game's core appeal of exploring a fantasy world. I'm actually open to the possibility that marriage and whatever could be made to support that core appeal, but in their current form they don't. I'm not even sure why they're in the game at all. Maybe someone was trying to keep up with Fable, of all things.
Remember that ugly tavern wench you woke up next to after a long night partying with Sam Guevenne? Nine months later she shows up at your house with the ugliest child you've ever seen.shrekfan246 said:I don't see why there are people who are getting all aggressive about it though, not like it's going to be shoved in your face. Well, hopefully at least.