Ussually I'd tell people to stop complaining but yeah, this doesnt seem like a 60 dollar game. It should go down fairly quickly. But hey, demo was good, and as long as it improves slightly from the last game it should be good.HardRockSamurai said:To be honest, I want a little more out of a game I spend $60.00 on. I'll wait for a price drop, but that doesn't mean I don't want to play it.
I'm glad you didn't buy MW2.HardRockSamurai said:To be honest, I want a little more out of a game I spend $60.00 on. I'll wait for a price drop, but that doesn't mean I don't want to play it.
New weapons, three new special infected, four new survivors, 5 new campaigns, 2 new game modes(with maps for all...) is hardly free DLC.Gfan_00 said:Pshht... $60? I got it for $45. But I feel that if EA weren't involved, then it probably would be DLC for L4D, although the game is definitely worth $60. I hate publishers.
This is one of the least support claims I've ever seen.LordWalter said:/Proceeds to disagree with entire thread. I thought it was a massive letdown. L4D 1 is vastly superior in every conceivable way. They took an excellent game that was brilliant in its simplicity and added bells and whistles and by bells and whistles I mean Fail and Aids.
YES. [http://steamgames.com/tf2/heavy/] IT. [http://www.teamfortress.com/scoutupdate/] FREAKING. [http://steamgames.com/tf2/pyro/] IS. [http://www.teamfortress.com/sniper_vs_spy/day01_english.htm]CanOfPop said:New weapons, three new special infected, four new survivors, 5 new campaigns, 2 new game modes(with maps for all...) is hardly free DLC.
It's harder to design maps for L4D than TF2. In my opinion at least.Katana314 said:YES. [http://steamgames.com/tf2/heavy/] IT. [http://www.teamfortress.com/scoutupdate/] FREAKING. [http://steamgames.com/tf2/pyro/] IS. [http://www.teamfortress.com/sniper_vs_spy/day01_english.htm]CanOfPop said:New weapons, three new special infected, four new survivors, 5 new campaigns, 2 new game modes(with maps for all...) is hardly free DLC.