MiracleOfSound said:
AceAngel said:
This means that while there are MANY people out there to enjoy, dislike, worship or outright loathe their game, this doesn't hide the fact that Valve simply has a subset of gamers who are the most pretentious and self-righteous ones ever known.
I think any company has that subset. I've heard the same said about Bioware fans, Bungee fans, Team ICO fans, even IW fans... lol.
Not many Bioware fans make smart remarks about how Shepard is Jesus and the game is very biblical, nor do Bungie boys confront me about how the game is a delicious irony of humans being the homogeneous ones deep seethed genocide of their own species while an automation union of the aliens brought individuality and harmony to all the species under their control.
It's not bad that there are intelligent people in the industry and their favorite hobby, it's just perplexing when they think every-single-game of CoD (even the old ones, upto MW1) are piles of crap. Some of them good you know, just because a few bad apples were dropped here and there doesn't mean that suddenly Valve and HL2 are the only games worth paying 60$ for, there are other games.
Yes, Bioware has some bad case of people who protect at all costs (ME1 <-> ME2 comes to mind) but at least they don't act like hipsters, and say that I will die if I don't play their games. I love Valve, and I still somewhat have a soft-spot for Bioware, but acting all high and mighty?
Let me put this example, on 4chan, we have trolls everywhere, it's part of the course, and each topic is seethed with, for a lack of better terms, poison. On the Escapist, in a single a topic/thread, we can have such a hot debate, that metaphorically, it's equal to soo much bile and poison from 4chan that it's worth about 4 threads from there.
It's still exists, but the concentration is much higher for Valvites.
Trolldor said:
AceAngel said:
Gabanuka said:
Why do I have a deep seated fear that episode 3 is gonna be shit?
Valve is like the Cohen Brothers, they make games that attract the most pretentious group of people who try to act better than you for knowing more about it. Playing Portal and Half-Life plus all the bull-crap spin-off from GearBox somehow makes you better than everyone else. What this entails is picking cheap liners from the game, and repeating them ad nausea because no one appreciated the dark humor of Glados, but felt the need of saying "Cake" which was the 'weirdest' part for me, not the funniest.
For HL3, what this entails is hype. Simple and clear hype on the largest scale possible. Even if it's bad, Valvites won't admit to it being bad. They'll say it's great and epic and everything a game has to be.
This is the problem, HL3 will be good, just like Batman AA or Portal was, what it comes down to is the hype of said game, will you believe or will you not? Personally, I was very disappointed in my personal case with Batman AA due to all the hype around it, as well as Crysis. They were not bad games, just shallower then given credit to, and this is the fight Valve has ahead of itself with HL3.
Captcha: gentlmen, ourres
I had imagined Valve was a game company producing some of the best characterised FPS.
And hype?
I lol'd. You're the one who generates hype for yourself. No matter what somebody else's opinion might be, they don't make your opinion for you.
Depends on what you mean by characterized FPS's. If you mean the people you meet, yes, I agree. They all had a certain degree of feeling human, and actually felt like the world and characters are part of each other and reflected this well. However, the person who is a non-character here is Gordon Freeman, since he is a projection of persona on the player, but the reason the player feels so connected to Gordon isn't because of who he is, but because of how he 'moves' and animates.
Think about it, in many games you see the arms and hands of your characters in complex animations, and they have that floaty feeling to them? That shoots you out of the feeling of playing the game and being yourself.
Yet in HL series, you don't have that issue, because the animation are simple and crude for the player, allowing his brain to, without rhythm or reason, connect the sensation of an activity as simulated identity rather then watching identity.
In movies, you watch the actor watching, in games, you watch THROUGH the character watching, and that is why complex animations feel alot less personal and simple ones more personal.
FEAR is a second contender for this place, and Mirror's Edge as well, (although I only played the demo, so my opinion for this one, should be taken with salt).
As for hype, no, I'm pretty sure people-based general consensus about a game is a pretty valid indicator of what to expect out of a game. I cannot trust reviewers easily, not even Yahtzee, and take general opinion about a game with a pinch of salt. Since I also have next to zero knowledge of market product, no amount of demo can help me decide if I want to buy the game. We're not talking about a new razor for my beard or a new shampoo I can buy and return back willy nilly or not mind the price tag, even a hair-dryer is more market knowledge then a game of Pac-Man, especially with the looming market.
Unless I pirate it, but we'll leave that alone for now...and isn't the whole industry based upon hyping up a game? Even Yahtzee loved Batman, and massive amount of accolade where thrown to it. This meant that I would ATLEAST enjoy it, which I did, but the hype build for it, I felt, was a tad too much, as the good parts were a stark contrast to the issues at hand.
So yeah, hype and favor for a game does lend a person to buying it believe it or not, because that's how the market functions...unless I pirate it.