If Halo was a multi-platform title then we wouldn't be having this argument.
The Halo argument is usually carried out by two parties; those who have Halo and those who don't.
Lets look at CoD4 here shall we; Multi-Platform game. Similar to CoD2 with modern face lift, made use of create a class that is a nice feature for multiplayer, has some really epic single player moments, looks great, over all fun to play.
Lets look at Halo 2; NOT Multi-platform, similar to Halo 1 with a graphics face lift; made use of matchmaking that has been used in every Console FPS since (possible the best thing for console FPS' as far as multiplayer is concerned) which is a nice feature, has some great Single player moments and is over all fun to play.
These games are very similar, but why does CoD4 have less hate then the Halo franchise? Well I think its because halo is easilly picked on by "xbox haters" while CoD4 isn't as easilly picked on because by saying the Xbox version of CoD4 is crap your saying that the PS3 and PC versions are crap.
The Halo sucks argument came from the PS2 and Xbox flamewars of 2004. This War has died down but it still ocasionally surfaces, such as the post I'm talking replying too now.
I'm not saying I think halo is "TEH BESTESTZ GAMERZ EVA 111ONE!!! but the hate directed at Halo is just pointless fanboy attacks. So I find it a little bit hard to say that Halo is the sucks when by saying that I am putting my self in the position of being a Halo Hater Fanboy.I can't say that halo "Rock in the socks with the box that has the dots, dominoes" because that makes me as idiotic as those that say Halo sucks.
I'm not neutral in this Flame War, I think I take my side with halo because I must admit I did enjoy the game. The Position I take in this flame war is "I don't care". I've played Halo and I have my impressions of it. What some dickweed on the internet says about it or the console I own will never change my opinion of any game.
The Halo argument is usually carried out by two parties; those who have Halo and those who don't.
Lets look at CoD4 here shall we; Multi-Platform game. Similar to CoD2 with modern face lift, made use of create a class that is a nice feature for multiplayer, has some really epic single player moments, looks great, over all fun to play.
Lets look at Halo 2; NOT Multi-platform, similar to Halo 1 with a graphics face lift; made use of matchmaking that has been used in every Console FPS since (possible the best thing for console FPS' as far as multiplayer is concerned) which is a nice feature, has some great Single player moments and is over all fun to play.
These games are very similar, but why does CoD4 have less hate then the Halo franchise? Well I think its because halo is easilly picked on by "xbox haters" while CoD4 isn't as easilly picked on because by saying the Xbox version of CoD4 is crap your saying that the PS3 and PC versions are crap.
The Halo sucks argument came from the PS2 and Xbox flamewars of 2004. This War has died down but it still ocasionally surfaces, such as the post I'm talking replying too now.
I'm not saying I think halo is "TEH BESTESTZ GAMERZ EVA 111ONE!!! but the hate directed at Halo is just pointless fanboy attacks. So I find it a little bit hard to say that Halo is the sucks when by saying that I am putting my self in the position of being a Halo Hater Fanboy.I can't say that halo "Rock in the socks with the box that has the dots, dominoes" because that makes me as idiotic as those that say Halo sucks.
I'm not neutral in this Flame War, I think I take my side with halo because I must admit I did enjoy the game. The Position I take in this flame war is "I don't care". I've played Halo and I have my impressions of it. What some dickweed on the internet says about it or the console I own will never change my opinion of any game.