Here's another nitpick and this one is more from a filmmaking perspective (and I've never made a movie). They have the scenes where Batman and Gordon are planning to take back Gotham and everything. So they go through the whole plan and explain what they are going to do... and then they do it without too much trouble. Unless it's a movie like The Killing where they explain how the plot is supposed to work and then show how the plot goes bad, why bother running through it with the audience beforehand? Most movies tend to go "okay boys, here's what we're gonna do." Then it fades to black and they do it. Seems like they could have saved some time there, but then again, I'm just some dude. Pretentious complaint is pretentious. I won't feel like that's an actual "problem" until I see the movie a second time.
And this movie is definitely worth a second viewing. Anyone else feel like the action sequences were slightly better than the previous movies? The first had the jittery shaky cam and the second had the weird editing (see Jim Emerson video on google), but this one seemed the most balanced and had the best sense of weight and space. The shots seemed to be held longer and you could tell what was going on easier. Less ambitious maybe, but I don't know, "better" from a story perspective.
And this movie is definitely worth a second viewing. Anyone else feel like the action sequences were slightly better than the previous movies? The first had the jittery shaky cam and the second had the weird editing (see Jim Emerson video on google), but this one seemed the most balanced and had the best sense of weight and space. The shots seemed to be held longer and you could tell what was going on easier. Less ambitious maybe, but I don't know, "better" from a story perspective.