Stalker 2 has... Draconian DRM.

Recommended Videos

Reaper69lol

Disciple of The Gravity cat
Apr 16, 2010
747
0
0
Why is it that recently all the companies are playing 'who can piss their customers off more' game? I'm looking at you Id!
 

PotatoLord

New member
Jun 1, 2010
22
0
0
You see, the only real problem with DRM is that it only ever hurts the legitimate consumer. All strict DRM does to pirates is make it take them longer to crack the game. Once they've cracked the game, say by creating a patch with all the over-the-internet data, the DRM does nothing to them, and continues to hassle the legitimate consumer. Consider if the game's servers went down. No legitimate consumer would be able to play the game, but the pirates would be able to just fine! So, in reality, DRM does nothing for its intended purpose: stopping pirates.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
veloper said:
Having Valve and Activision doing always online DRM is bad enough, but atleast those companies can be expected to be with us for a long time to come.
Valve doesn't have always-on DRM.
henritje said:
TheBelgianGuy said:
Oh dear, yet another company tries to save their game from pirating. HOW DARE THEY WANT TO EARN MONEY?
you DO know that you need a internet connection THE ENTIRE TIME YOU ARE PLAYING IT right?
FUCK YOU EA! also this is the first time it,s LITERARY un-pirateble.
good job EA! for raising DRM douchebagness to a new level!
EA have nothing to do with Stalker 2.

Clive Howlitzer said:
It must really suck to be that 1% of people who live in east bumfuck and don't have internet. I'd be wicked pissed if I were them.
Because of course, your ISP will never perform maintenance, nothing will ever go wrong with your connection, and the game's servers will never, ever go down. No sir, none of that will ever fucking happen or affect anyone with a decent connection.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
Woodsey said:
veloper said:
Having Valve and Activision doing always online DRM is bad enough, but atleast those companies can be expected to be with us for a long time to come.
Valve doesn't have always-on DRM.
Well that's true. Valve's DRM is much more benign than what GSC is trying to pull here.

Since we'd need a good online connection to play STALKER2 anyway, GSC should simply let Valve distribute the game through Steam.
Saves them a bunch of game servers. Saves the consumer alot of hassle and uncertainty. Lower investment and more sales.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Xerxes250 said:
Plus one for a valid concern, but minus several dozen for the tabloid title.

P.S. I'm still gonna buy it.
If demanding a constant internet connection to play a game that you own isn't draconian, what would you say is a more fitting term?
 

Assassin Xaero

New member
Jul 23, 2008
5,392
0
0
Continuity said:
Or it may as well have been (cancelled) for as likely as I am to buy it now:

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/10/08/permanent-internet-access-for-stalker-2/

Stupid fuckers have killed their own game.

?Software piracy is an issue for us, we try to fight it, but within reason? Protection from piracy? Part of the content will be located on the server and downloaded as the game progresses. Permanent internet access is required. Text information, code and quests will be loaded through that connection.?
You know, I was about to come here and say "oh boo hoo, some little DRM that you won't even notice." And well, sorry for that. I agree with this, permanent internet access crosses the line.
 

Windcaler

New member
Nov 7, 2010
1,332
0
0
I wasnt planning on getting stalker 2 anyway but after hearing this Im sure I wont. I oppose all kinds of DRM on pure principle. Inconveniencing your customers for any reason is never a good business model and should not be tolerated by consumers.

Of course the kicker is it will only be a few hours to a full day before dedicated pirates have the thing cracked
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,526
4,295
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
Well, at least they aren't pretending its for any reason besides piracy but I'm not buying it, fuck any game that is a pc rental.
 

Waaghpowa

Needs more Dakka
Apr 13, 2010
3,073
0
0
Even though the "Always online" DRM doesn't affect me as my ISP is stable, I still think it's stupid. All DRM does, especially this kind, is force honest customers jump through hoops to prove they're honest, while pirates don't have to do anything.

Take a page from CD Projekt Red. They don't use DRM, and they're doing very well for themselves.

Also, anyone who says "They're just protecting their ip", Ubisoft put always online DRM on Assassins Creed 2 and it got cracked. It was a better version because you didn't have the stupid always online condition. http://www.geekosystem.com/assassins-creed-2-drm-crack-ubisoft/
 

zehydra

New member
Oct 25, 2009
5,033
0
0
yep, when will these guys realize that
A) we aren't connected all the time
B) We don't WANT to be connected all the time
C) The internet just isn't GOOD enough to be connected all the time.
 

The Madman

New member
Dec 7, 2007
4,404
0
0
Well I hope the game sells well on consoles because it's not likely to on the PC anymore with stuff like this. I don't buy Ubisoft titles that have always-on DRM for this exact reason, which is a shame because I heard the newest Settlers game was good, I wont be picking up STALKER 2.

Pity, huge fan of the series. Would have been an almost guaranteed purchase from me otherwise. Now... we'll see.
 

Steppin Razor

New member
Dec 15, 2009
6,868
0
0
plugav said:
There's DRM out there that locks out content if you buy a used copy or limits the amount of installations possible. At least the system those guys propose doesn't seem to deny the most basic consumer laws.

It's still stupid, of course, for a single player game to be unplayable offline is an extremely stupid feature and I certainly wouldn't pay much for a product this flawed.
I know, and I oppose those too. However, we are obviously of differing opinions as I consider this much more restrictive then the "pay $10 to unlock online" and limited installs methods. Yes, those two are incredibly annoying and stupid, but you can still at least play the game whenever you want to. You're not at the mercy of your ISP and a game company's servers.

Treblaine said:
If demanding a constant internet connection to play a game that you own isn't draconian, what would you say is a more fitting term?
The original thread title was something like "STALKER 2 Cancelled" before the OP changed it due to people saying it was misleading.
 

Still Life

New member
Sep 22, 2010
1,137
0
0
zehydra said:
C) The internet just isn't GOOD enough to be connected all the time.
This is a really good point. The quality of internet services and infrastructure is widely inconsistent around the world. For such a connected (lol) age we live in, the majority of people sure do enjoy spotty internets [sic].
 

RA92

New member
Jan 1, 2011
3,079
0
0
Continuity said:
Skopintsev said:
Jesus christ some people... Is this REALLY that big of a hassle? *****, *****, *****.. It seems every day the gaming community is heraling a new reason why the gaming industry is 'dead' to them.

So you must be connected to the internet in order to play a SP game; so fucking what? If you're a PC gamer, you're connected to the internet 98% of the day, the other 2% might be the wee hours of the morning when you IP shuts down the connection for maitenence. Whats the issue?


Boycotts, project 10 dollar, DRM, etc. etc. I've been a gamer since I could hold a controller (1990) and you know what? The industry has never been BETTER, but the community has never been WORSE!
Let me give you a few reasons why this is a problem:

Stalker games are buggy and broken and community patches and mods fix this to a large degree - No longer possible.
Not to mention since the sequel will be multi-platform, they'll have even less resources to spend behind the PC version.

Oh well.
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,581
0
0
yayforgiveaway said:
Remember AC? They said that it would win over piracy? Few days after release there were offline artificial servers with required content. Just an inconvenience for the good guys.
Pretty much this. This is ridiculous beyond words, to be honest. I really wish the industry would find some other way to fight piracy. I dunno, maybe by lowering the price of games a bit or actually putting out content we'll be willing to pay for, instead of an upteenth shit sequel.

I know I'm floundering here, I'm sure someone else can remind me of the several tastier alternatives to DRM.
 

Smurf McSmurfington

New member
Jun 24, 2010
235
0
0
Oh lovely. I'm willing to bet they have NO IDEA how much long term damage they did to themselves just now. This will damage them FAR more than piracy. The thing about piracy is that the large majority of people who do pirate, wouldn't buy the game at all if it weren't for the option to pirate. Basically all the majority of pirates are doing is giving free publicity to the games they pirated.
 

gyrobot_v1legacy

New member
Apr 30, 2009
768
0
0
HAWX 2 would like a word with you, it was one of the few games which to this day is not successfully cracked for the PC.

Before that, Porn Games managed to defend itself against pirates (at least over here).
 

Jaeger_CDN

New member
Aug 9, 2010
280
0
0
I've purchased every STALKER game physical retail from the beginning on Day 1(even after they forgot to supply Canadian retailers with CoP and I had to order it from the US), with this new version I'm going to wait and see.

I may buy this but it'll be well after it's been released and dumped in the bargain bin. This'll mean that GSC will only get $0.10 profit instead of the $10 (or whatever it is) for a day 1 sale. Hopefully by then it'll have been fixed (since it's the mods that do that not the official patches) as well as the DRM bull shit as well.

And for the record, I have yet to complete vanilla Clear Sky since it's always crashed at some point and corrupted 1/2 the game for me. I bought it even though I knew it was dumped out the door half baked and without any decent QA testing
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,651
0
0
I'm a big fan of STALKER. That being said, they can go fuck themselves. I'm not buying this. When I buy a game, I want to be able to play it on my own terms. Constant internet connection opposes that freedom. When you want to take that freedom away from me, you should no longer consider me your customer. It's that simple. There are other games I can play. Also, part of the content will be stored on their servers? Screw that! When I buy games I expect them to have all the content that I payed for. These guys are crossing the line even further than Ubisoft. As an honest customer all I can say is that I won't allow them to treat me like a criminal.
gyrobot said:
HAWX 2 would like a word with you, it was one of the few games which to this day is not successfully cracked for the PC.
That's because no one cared enough to crack it.
 
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Still Life said:
zehydra said:
C) The internet just isn't GOOD enough to be connected all the time.
This is a really good point. The quality of internet services and infrastructure is widely inconsistent around the world. For such a connected (lol) age we live in, the majority of people sure do enjoy spotty internets [sic].
Especially since they're located in Ukraine.

I really don't see this working out well.

Guess I won't buy this. Shame, I was really looking forward to this game. I love the other STALKER games.