Why is it that recently all the companies are playing 'who can piss their customers off more' game? I'm looking at you Id!
Valve doesn't have always-on DRM.veloper said:Having Valve and Activision doing always online DRM is bad enough, but atleast those companies can be expected to be with us for a long time to come.
EA have nothing to do with Stalker 2.henritje said:you DO know that you need a internet connection THE ENTIRE TIME YOU ARE PLAYING IT right?TheBelgianGuy said:Oh dear, yet another company tries to save their game from pirating. HOW DARE THEY WANT TO EARN MONEY?
FUCK YOU EA! also this is the first time it,s LITERARY un-pirateble.
good job EA! for raising DRM douchebagness to a new level!
Because of course, your ISP will never perform maintenance, nothing will ever go wrong with your connection, and the game's servers will never, ever go down. No sir, none of that will ever fucking happen or affect anyone with a decent connection.Clive Howlitzer said:It must really suck to be that 1% of people who live in east bumfuck and don't have internet. I'd be wicked pissed if I were them.
Well that's true. Valve's DRM is much more benign than what GSC is trying to pull here.Woodsey said:Valve doesn't have always-on DRM.veloper said:Having Valve and Activision doing always online DRM is bad enough, but atleast those companies can be expected to be with us for a long time to come.
If demanding a constant internet connection to play a game that you own isn't draconian, what would you say is a more fitting term?Xerxes250 said:Plus one for a valid concern, but minus several dozen for the tabloid title.
P.S. I'm still gonna buy it.
You know, I was about to come here and say "oh boo hoo, some little DRM that you won't even notice." And well, sorry for that. I agree with this, permanent internet access crosses the line.Continuity said:Or it may as well have been (cancelled) for as likely as I am to buy it now:
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/10/08/permanent-internet-access-for-stalker-2/
Stupid fuckers have killed their own game.
?Software piracy is an issue for us, we try to fight it, but within reason? Protection from piracy? Part of the content will be located on the server and downloaded as the game progresses. Permanent internet access is required. Text information, code and quests will be loaded through that connection.?
I know, and I oppose those too. However, we are obviously of differing opinions as I consider this much more restrictive then the "pay $10 to unlock online" and limited installs methods. Yes, those two are incredibly annoying and stupid, but you can still at least play the game whenever you want to. You're not at the mercy of your ISP and a game company's servers.plugav said:There's DRM out there that locks out content if you buy a used copy or limits the amount of installations possible. At least the system those guys propose doesn't seem to deny the most basic consumer laws.
It's still stupid, of course, for a single player game to be unplayable offline is an extremely stupid feature and I certainly wouldn't pay much for a product this flawed.
The original thread title was something like "STALKER 2 Cancelled" before the OP changed it due to people saying it was misleading.Treblaine said:If demanding a constant internet connection to play a game that you own isn't draconian, what would you say is a more fitting term?
This is a really good point. The quality of internet services and infrastructure is widely inconsistent around the world. For such a connected (lol) age we live in, the majority of people sure do enjoy spotty internets [sic].zehydra said:C) The internet just isn't GOOD enough to be connected all the time.
Not to mention since the sequel will be multi-platform, they'll have even less resources to spend behind the PC version.Continuity said:Let me give you a few reasons why this is a problem:Skopintsev said:Jesus christ some people... Is this REALLY that big of a hassle? *****, *****, *****.. It seems every day the gaming community is heraling a new reason why the gaming industry is 'dead' to them.
So you must be connected to the internet in order to play a SP game; so fucking what? If you're a PC gamer, you're connected to the internet 98% of the day, the other 2% might be the wee hours of the morning when you IP shuts down the connection for maitenence. Whats the issue?
Boycotts, project 10 dollar, DRM, etc. etc. I've been a gamer since I could hold a controller (1990) and you know what? The industry has never been BETTER, but the community has never been WORSE!
Stalker games are buggy and broken and community patches and mods fix this to a large degree - No longer possible.
Pretty much this. This is ridiculous beyond words, to be honest. I really wish the industry would find some other way to fight piracy. I dunno, maybe by lowering the price of games a bit or actually putting out content we'll be willing to pay for, instead of an upteenth shit sequel.yayforgiveaway said:Remember AC? They said that it would win over piracy? Few days after release there were offline artificial servers with required content. Just an inconvenience for the good guys.
That's because no one cared enough to crack it.gyrobot said:HAWX 2 would like a word with you, it was one of the few games which to this day is not successfully cracked for the PC.
Especially since they're located in Ukraine.Still Life said:This is a really good point. The quality of internet services and infrastructure is widely inconsistent around the world. For such a connected (lol) age we live in, the majority of people sure do enjoy spotty internets [sic].zehydra said:C) The internet just isn't GOOD enough to be connected all the time.