This confuses me. How is it vicious if it mostly hurt his pride?Nantucket said:Wow... that was viscous. But at least it was only slaps - I imagine it stung his pride more than caused any real damage.
More often than not one of those words gets you forum banned.AlphaLackey said:The fact that you chose to censor one but not the other suggests otherwise.GildaTheGriffin said:I support the gay community, but when someone speaks such a slur that is common in today's society, don't react unless he is going to physically harm you. The word, '******' is like the racial slur 'N word' towards African Americans.
you are right, as a general rule a slap will cause less damage, but this isn't always a certainty, I'm simply speaking from several years of martial arts training, the reason why a slap can do significant damage to some one is that a slap can gain momentum due to the swinging arc, i personally know someone who suffered whiplash due to being slapped, because it was hard enough to jolt his neck, and yes a backhand will do more damage due to both the knuckles and the momentum that can be gathered in the short space due to the muscles used.Bara_no_Hime said:UK law aside, I have personal experience with slaps of both kinds.ramboondiea said:an open palm slap and back hand will generally do the same amount of damage, the difference usually being how much it hurts the attacker, an open palm slap will hurt more just because the palm is more sensitive, thats why it is easier to just backhand someone. but a i cant stress this enough, a slap can be just as dangerous as a punch, its just not as practical to use in a fight,
How? I do some Dominatrixing. A palm slap across the face hurts, but does no damage. A back-hand slap of the same force can split a lip and is likely to leave a bruise.
Now, I could see that it would be possible to do an open palm slap so hard that you do some damage with it - although damn, you'd need some upper body strength for that - but a back-hand slap is EASY to do damage without much strength. Knuckles suck like that.
Also, nails and rings can make an open-palm slap much more dangerous.
Anyway, the point being, I've trained a bit in how to cause pain without causing damage (or causing only the damage requested). If I seem to be splitting hairs about this slap thing, that's why. I've never assaulted anyone in an actual fight, so I don't have any knowledge of these things outside a very controlled environment, but I do know that, with a consistent force level, that open palms slaps do less damage than back-hand slaps, because your palm is a lot softer than your bony knuckles. It's like the difference between whipping someone with a soft leather tipped crop and a hard wooden switch. Both are similar tools, with similar leverage, used with the same force, but one (the wooden switch) does a lot more damage.
Oh, and for the record, I find talking about slap physics far more entertaining than talking about the fist fight of the thread topic.
Whiplash? DAMN. That was quite a slap!ramboondiea said:you are right, as a general rule a slap will cause less damage, but this isn't always a certainty, I'm simply speaking from several years of martial arts training, the reason why a slap can do significant damage to some one is that a slap can gain momentum due to the swinging arc, i personally know someone who suffered whiplash due to being slapped, because it was hard enough to jolt his neck, and yes a backhand will do more damage due to both the knuckles and the momentum that can be gathered in the short space due to the muscles used.
and don't get me wrong, given the choice I would rather have a slap then a back hander as unless the person knows what they are doing, its going to hurt a lot less.
and yeah, the thread itself is pretty crappy, its about a group of people all in the wrong, so there is little to talk about, i only chimed in because I have a law degree and I feel I should at least use the info from time to time ha
That's a Louis C.K. (and Southpark) bit, and while it makes some sense since ****** is a very ambiguous word that has had several meanings since it's inception (bundle, cigarette), it doesn't make sense trying to take back retard or ******.theultimateend said:So here is my problem, I LOATHE when people use the word ****** as a derogatory term for homosexuals.
There really needs to be a movement to make it only mean annoying people, throughout my youth it was only ever used to describe someone who was being a jackass.
Yeah really it's like the phrase "And then the Europeans came" in history books. Nothing good happens after that just violence, bigotry, and disease.Lionsfan said:Also, has anything good ever gone down in a Wafflehouse? I feel like if any story has, "And then we went to Wafflehouse, it's gonna end bad"
Eddie Murphy used to make a joke about this (gay men were a favorite target). I don't remember the joke, but I remember the context. Essentially it doesn't matter how effeminate, weak, coquettish, or friendly a gay man is, it's still a man, and if you piss him off he will more than likely hit as hard as any straight man would.krazykidd said:Lolllll . Thats funny . So is this gonna be a new trend ? Straight bashing?
You KNOW this guys is gonna go on a gay bashing spree once he recovers . That or get laughed outta town by gettig beat up by gay guys ( he seems like the kind if guy that would associate himself with homophobes ).
Anyways stranger things have happened .
i came up with the same conclusion, it was a bit over the top.. or was it, cuz those punches was so funny.. i have seen girls throw better punches lolan874 said:She hit him first, he hit back, then the guys he insulted beat his ass. He didn't deserve it, but he had it coming let's put it that way. I also just want to say the guy might not be that hardcore a homophobe, people will say anything in a heated argument.
I think Escapist would prohibit me from saying it. ****** isn't a banned word like the N word I believe. Sorry if ****** is.WaysideMaze said:Interesting how you state the 2 words are equal, yet have only typed out one of them.GildaTheGriffin said:I support the gay community, but when someone speaks such a slur that is common in today's society, don't react unless he is going to physically harm you. The word, '******' is like the racial slur 'N word' towards African Americans. The 'N word' is used commonly now, but still has meaning if used wrong.
I'm don't believe ****** is a banned word by the site. Also the N word sounds wrong to me, I don't like saying it in public.AlphaLackey said:The fact that you chose to censor one but not the other suggests otherwise.GildaTheGriffin said:I support the gay community, but when someone speaks such a slur that is common in today's society, don't react unless he is going to physically harm you. The word, '******' is like the racial slur 'N word' towards African Americans.