A bird in the hand is a bird that you have caught for sure.Xojins said:"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". Doesn't really make sense to me.
I know what it means, it's just a weird saying that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me; why couldn't you try getting two birds? You don't have to let the one you have go. And why is a bird in your hand in the first place?Jonluw said:A bird in the hand is a bird that you have caught for sure.Xojins said:"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". Doesn't really make sense to me.
You might have a chance of catching those two birds in the bush, but you shouldn't let go of the bird in your hand to do that.
"A bird in your hand" implies that you have the bird for sure. You have managed to catch this bird. Do you not agree that it is better to have caught a bird for sure than to have the possibility to catch to others?Xojins said:I know what it means, it's just a weird saying that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me; why couldn't you try getting two birds? You don't have to let the one you have go. And why is a bird in your hand in the first place?Jonluw said:A bird in the hand is a bird that you have caught for sure.Xojins said:"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". Doesn't really make sense to me.
You might have a chance of catching those two birds in the bush, but you shouldn't let go of the bird in your hand to do that.
Sigh, yes I know what this saying means, I know what it implies etc. My point was that it doesn't make sense to me because of what I said in my previous post.Jonluw said:"A bird in your hand" implies that you have the bird for sure. You have managed to catch this bird. Do you not agree that it is better to have caught a bird for sure than to have the possibility to catch to others?Xojins said:I know what it means, it's just a weird saying that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me; why couldn't you try getting two birds? You don't have to let the one you have go. And why is a bird in your hand in the first place?Jonluw said:A bird in the hand is a bird that you have caught for sure.Xojins said:"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". Doesn't really make sense to me.
You might have a chance of catching those two birds in the bush, but you shouldn't let go of the bird in your hand to do that.
Ask yourself what situation you would rather be in:
The one where you're holding a tasty treat for dinner in your hand, or the one where two tasty, but very jumpy dinner-treats are hiding in a bush nearby?
Edit: We're not talking about a scenario where you have a bird in the hand and there are two in the bush. There are two different scenarios, and the saying is asking which one you'd rather be in.
Ninja'd. I don't know what it means either but it always bugs me when people say it.Xojins said:"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". Doesn't really make sense to me.
And I explained that your reason for it not making sense is faulty. You can't chase after the two birds in the bush without losing the bird in your hand.Xojins said:Sigh, yes I know what this saying means, I know what it implies etc. My point was that it doesn't make sense to me because of what I said in my previous post.Jonluw said:"A bird in your hand" implies that you have the bird for sure. You have managed to catch this bird. Do you not agree that it is better to have caught a bird for sure than to have the possibility to catch to others?Xojins said:I know what it means, it's just a weird saying that doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me; why couldn't you try getting two birds? You don't have to let the one you have go. And why is a bird in your hand in the first place?Jonluw said:A bird in the hand is a bird that you have caught for sure.Xojins said:"A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush". Doesn't really make sense to me.
You might have a chance of catching those two birds in the bush, but you shouldn't let go of the bird in your hand to do that.
Ask yourself what situation you would rather be in:
The one where you're holding a tasty treat for dinner in your hand, or the one where two tasty, but very jumpy dinner-treats are hiding in a bush nearby?
Edit: We're not talking about a scenario where you have a bird in the hand and there are two in the bush. There are two different scenarios, and the saying is asking which one you'd rather be in.
Actually, the origional phrase was "eating your cake and having it too", but they somehow got mixed up.bulldogftw said:Like trying to have one's cake and eat it
Thank you, i didn't know thatDeathsong17 said:Actually, the origional phrase was "eating your cake and having it too", but they somehow got mixed up.bulldogftw said:Like trying to have one's cake and eat it