SckizoBoy said:
Scabadus said:
GamerPhate said:
I held 2 cells and drank some normal bottled water that I had tachyonized for a few hours.
How, exactly, do you go about 'tachyonising' a bottle of water? Because I doubt it's very healthy for you, that high you're feeling may just be radiation poisoning.
GamerPhate said:
Tachyon particles are SOOO small and go soo fast (THROUGH the earth's molicule gaps at NEAR the speed of light or faster) we don't have machines sophisticated enough to measure these particles. Perhaps when they built something smaller than a nano-meter or something that day will come.
Oh dear we've made a whoopsie. Tachyons are quantum particles, existing both as physical objects and electromagnetic waveforms depending on if they're observed. That being said, even while existing as particles they don't travel by speed in the same way we do, they exist as probability fields. However even with that, we as a race do have the ability to detect quantum particles, both using
our eyes (light photons are quantum particles) and devices like photometres and colourometeres. Tachyons, on the other hand, violate many principles of current universal physics theories and very likely can't be detected because they don't exist.
Of course you'd know all of this if you just read the wikipedia page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon], which I really recomend you do in future before irradiating yourself or wasting thousands of [your currancy here] trying to detect something that's already being looked for by qualified scientists with millian dollar budgets.
Just as well I didn't read his post... though I wonder: would tachyons have any effect on non-biologicals in water at all? And what would serve as a source of tachyons, given that even research theoretical physicists don't believe in their existence (or, rather, ability to exist in undistorted-space).
As far as water is concerned, does anyone
enjoy pure water? I've drunk DIW and... nothing, doesn't taste of water, let alone anything else.
#1 Ok first off, you need a LARGE clear tachyon crystal, they look flat on one side and roundish on the top. You place the bottle of water on the energy cell, and a few hours later, the water particles become ionized in a way through this process.
Also, about health concerns. The high isn't radiocative, or negative energy. You know how when you sit in front of a CRT for a long time and eventually you get a draining feeling? That is EMF's interacting with your SOEF field, or energy field that engulfs your body. EMF fields break down your cells, and cause negative effects, even cancer in high enough doses over a long enough time period. Tachyon energy deflects negative effects of EMF fields, and thus reduce fatigue in this case. They cause an effect on the cells to revert to their original state, instead of breaking down due to outside forces. Some people think that the fact that they move near or faster than the speed of light attributes them to these effects on biological material in the sense that, they cleanse all the negative effects of an environment, thus improving your well being. Can you overdose on this stuff? Not that I can tell, but I have read a study a dentist had done where he gave a kid a few BIG cells and went in the other room for just a momement, when he came back, the kid was nearly on the ground giddy with laughter, almost ecstatic. He removed the cells and after a while the kid returned to "normal". The main thing about these, are they not only do have a postive effect on you, they are LIFE LONG devices. When you buy one, you own it forever, and it works forever.
If for example the FDA were to hear about something like this, the Drug industry would be super pissed that a SINGLE reusable item could give similar effects and can be used daily and would NOT require you to buy more medicine each month. It would be similar to, for example, Thomas Edison's lightbulb invention. It STILL burns today... UNLIKE the models we can buy that are intended to malfunction after a threshold. My point is that, the world operates on the idea that you have to consume something to sustain an economy, and the idea of a single fix that last forever would devistate the industry. So ultimately, since there isn't technology to PROVE they exist, all we have is tools to verify that they are effecting something. Also one more point to make, you are being dosed with Tachyon energy if you use the energy cells or not. They come from space and pass through the Earth, so you are getting this energy just in low lumps. Also, electronics dimminish Tachyon energy, so the cells are helpful in modern society to focus the energy into a stronger source. No one has every claimed "ill" effects as far as i have researched or experienced.
#2 LOL, wiki.. yes they are ALWAYS right.. especially on fields of meta-physics. I love how wiki is the end all answer to everything. Do some REAL research before you comment. The reason scientists can't say they exist, is there is no DEVICE to say here, this is tachyon energy and we are measuring it. So, since they have no way to prove it, they say it doesn't exist. I would say that you are using the world is flat theory to prove that tachyons don't exist. You have no sailed around the world to prove it is round, so therefor it MUST be flat. However, science improved and man had an idea, he chased that dream, and found out that, egads, the theory was correct, the world is round! However, on that subject, much of science has constantly been hindered by religion. Take Galileo for example, he looked up and saw the stars and astral bodies move, and even though people though the Earth was the center of the universe at that time, he used science to disprove it, against popular belief. In fact, he was sentenced to house arrest for the remainder of his life, branded a heratic. I often wonder what it was like to be there in his observatory during those times, to look up to the heavens, do some calculations on paper, and be sure that the sun was moving around the Earth, and not the other way around. He was the only sane person on the planet at that time, and yet he was treated like a prisoner. But my point is, and I will use a paraphrase from Einstein I believe it was, something like "What is, isn't as improtant, as what could be".
CLIFFNOTES = Read the post before you just wiki some answer, cause you didn't read what I wrote.
