Essentially this.JanatUrlich said:I dunno really. I'd be kinda pissed if I had to take his name, but mainly because it's be a hassle. I don't have any problem with it on principle or anything
flip a coin ;D
Essentially this.JanatUrlich said:I dunno really. I'd be kinda pissed if I had to take his name, but mainly because it's be a hassle. I don't have any problem with it on principle or anything
flip a coin ;D
Do you think you're being charming or something? You're just coming off as a arrogant jerk.ColdStorage said:[text]
isn't it romantic!!Assassin Xaero said:That part made me start laughing pretty hard...ColdStorage said:- and guy looks at his watch
Lets agree to disagreeLadyZephyr said:Do you think you're being charming or something? You're just coming off as a arrogant jerk.ColdStorage said:[text]
"how do you know what the hell she's on about"
And that has a very negative connotation, not remedied by the tone of your post.
Maybe you should ease off the colloquialisms. You seem to be portraying yourself differently than you intend to.
Hmmm...tempting...but no, that's ok. Appreciate the offer, though.ColdStorage said:well i'm sorry to hear about that, I assume Arendt is your original name?, whats your ex husbands name? you want us to hassle him?
This is the internet, and its your site, we do your bidding trust me on this.
GATHER THE TROOPS SCAMOLA!, Tonight, Susans Ex's dine's in Hell, and OMG's., and EGGS
... Considering I have no idea what you mean, I don't know.ColdStorage said:ok fair dues, you got me there, i'm putting you into a corner in putting your weakness accross, will you?
Whaaaaat? She's getting rid of such charming and classy last name?ace_of_something said:She is taking my last name because it's much easier to say than hers. My last name is Ambolt as opposed to hers which is D'Aubignet.
I do think married couples should have the same surname, but that's mostly as a sign to the rest of the world that they belong to the same family. What surname they choose to take is their choice. To me, it doesn't necessarily have to be the man's surname, or the woman's surname. It doesn't even have to be a related surname, they can just pick one out of the blue that's theirs and theirs alone. The main thing is that the one and only purpose of marriage is to tie your lives together, and then it only makes sense that you tie your identities together as well.ColdStorage said:but what I ask you Menscapist's and Ladyscapist's is that, is that what you want, to the guyscapists, when you meet a girl you truely love, do you want her to take your name?
and Ladyscapist, are you ok with having to change your surname for the guy you love?
I think its the ultimate form of loving expression, changing your name for someone, but what do you people think?
We live in America where nearly everyone pronounces it 'duh-big-net'. Or Daw-beg-nay. She is also a teacher of 10 year olds who often times speak English as a second language (Spanish as a first) and have an impossible time saying it right. It's her choice. I guess 28 years is enough of that name. Maybe she wants to try something new for the next part of her life?Laura. said:Whaaaaat? She's getting rid of such charming and classy last name?ace_of_something said:She is taking my last name because it's much easier to say than hers. My last name is Ambolt as opposed to hers which is D'Aubignet.
If I marry my current girlfriend...ColdStorage said:snip