UtopiaV1 said:
You guys ever watched Minority Report? Where people who saw the future, "pre-cogs", predicted "crimes" that would happen in the future, and then the police would arrest the person who would commit the crime before they could do it. Do you remember how that film ended? (and don't say badly, but if you did i would agree

)
Turns out *gasp* intent and action are TOTALLY DIFFERENT THINGS!!! This is the stupidest waste of police time i've ever witnessed since my neighbor rang the local PD to complain about my unkempt fern tree in the garden. Especially given the fact that this person (in the above article) didn't have the EQUIPMENT necessary actually carry out the crime he said he was going to commit.
This is so stupid. This isn't games being used for good, this is the first step towards a 1984-style future...
EDIT: I see I have been beaten to the punch. Glad to see not everyone in here is a short-sighted, a-moral sheep...
If it was the government monitoring LIVE that then arrested the boy, and then probably the man for not saying anything about it on his own, then you would be right. It is a part of a person's civic duty to follow up when they are witness to a crime that is happening or is in the process of. I am curious when down the road a crime is committed against you or someone close to you, and you find out later that someone could have stepped up and said something that would have prevented the crime from being committed, if you would forgive that witness since they didn't play the part of an "Orwellian stooge." Ask yourself that.
quote]
When I was in school I was called into a principal's office for police questioning because someone said someone else said that someone else heard me and a friend "sinisterly plotting" to "blow up the school." I was labelled a terrorist, even though I was failing chemistry at the time which they would've noticed if our American heads weren't up George Dub-yah's ass at the time, and the rest of my scholastic career, the moment anything happened I was asked about it first.
now it's a slippery ass slope on this arguement and I am indeed overjoyed that a potentially serious crime may have been prevented. The question here is was it worth the cost? Any little thing that an aging conservative Senator sees as an opportunity to crack down on any kind of Broadly listed "Terrorist Acts" especially involving these stupid kids that
WONT GET OFF MY DAMN LAWN!!!!
He's gonna push an agenda that can capitalize on this. It isn't violent videogames save the day. It's Violent videogames cause students to rage and nearly become terrorists. They'll also probably work drugs and teen pregnancy into the headline somewhere.
As for one of our families or ourselves being victimized and there being potential to catch it...there always is one. It's your cell phone. Everyone's got one and the mic never shuts off, just is or isn't connected to the radio. EVERYTHING CAN BE HEARD IF YOU WISH. See how well you like it.