Most people do. It was the first thing that popped into my head too.kman123 said:
Im surprised no one jumped on this... but, I beg to differ... More and more AAA games are being released lackluster and horribly buggy, cause more AAA publishers ( usually not developers ) have realized that you'll pay for it regardless of quality.Delsana said:
Publishers don't determine what is AAA I go by quality.PerpetualGamer said:
Well if you didn't play them in the first place we wouldn't have to read your incessant constant crying around here, dude. The video game world isn't centered around you or your crotchety opinions.Delsana said:No, just quality over quantity.tokae said:Delsana said:
Indie-gamer much?
You know, he asked for AAA games that got a good reception from critics but were shot down by the gaming community as a whole.
Sure there may be some merit to argue some of the titles you just listed, but... There are some of the most successful games ever on that list too..
But anyways..
On topic I'd like to state Dragon Age 2, which I personally have no problem with contrary to...well everyone it seems.. And Far Cry 2, shit sucks! I mean, sure it's common nowadays, but why the heck does every publisher rush out unfinished, broken games? Everything is terrible in Far Cry 2 and I'm not saying it would've been better if they held it for a couple of months, but.. at least the AI would be a bit above amoeba instead of below.
I understand the reluctance but the situation remains that those games received acclaim by the gaming community perhaps but if you focus on the fact I said sacrificing one thing over the other and not doing something well enough, then those games fall into that perfectly.
Stop throwing SP campaigns into MP games so I can stop buying them, make up your mind and put your attention to one thing. Or, just stop calling it the best game, but all those games had horrible multiplayer issues if it was a feature as well.
If you'd prefer shitty games with poor quality then just accept what you get and be happy.Cridhe said:Well if you didn't play them in the first place we wouldn't have to read your incessant constant crying around here, dude. The video game world isn't centered around you or your crotchety opinions.Delsana said:No, just quality over quantity.tokae said:Delsana said:
Indie-gamer much?
You know, he asked for AAA games that got a good reception from critics but were shot down by the gaming community as a whole.
Sure there may be some merit to argue some of the titles you just listed, but... There are some of the most successful games ever on that list too..
But anyways..
On topic I'd like to state Dragon Age 2, which I personally have no problem with contrary to...well everyone it seems.. And Far Cry 2, shit sucks! I mean, sure it's common nowadays, but why the heck does every publisher rush out unfinished, broken games? Everything is terrible in Far Cry 2 and I'm not saying it would've been better if they held it for a couple of months, but.. at least the AI would be a bit above amoeba instead of below.
I understand the reluctance but the situation remains that those games received acclaim by the gaming community perhaps but if you focus on the fact I said sacrificing one thing over the other and not doing something well enough, then those games fall into that perfectly.
Stop throwing SP campaigns into MP games so I can stop buying them, make up your mind and put your attention to one thing. Or, just stop calling it the best game, but all those games had horrible multiplayer issues if it was a feature as well.
You trolling bro?Delsana said:
No but really, inFamous was bloody brilliant (same with the second) really good gameplay and even Yahtzee thinks of it highly.Sizzle Montyjing said:You trolling bro?Delsana said:
Or just looking to start a flame-war?
Anyway, i've higlighted the ones in which you're wrong about (in my opinion, i'll explain why)
Resistance- I've only played the first one (the 2nd might be terrible) and i have to say i had a real good time with the singleplayer (didn't try out multiplayer).
[HORRIBLE GAME, with horrible singleplayer story with plot holes, a difficulty imbalance that is on par with Killzone's horrible difficulty balancing. Here's a hint, in Game Design school you learn not to make a game where DYING becomes a part of the expectation and thus immersion breaking but that game lines you up (just like Resistance 2) to die NUMEROUS TIMES with little guidance on what to do for most enemies, it is ridiculous and while I was good at it the dying even came to me out of no where, that is a design feature that falls. You'll notice though that any game with SP and MP will be on my list if the SP and MP differ at all (unlike an RTS) because when you HAVE BOTH rapidly different scenarios in a game you will have to sacrifice on one or the other, and it's obvious where they made the sacrifices]
Killzone 2- I can sort of understand this, but i thought it had some of the best fire-fights i had ever been in, plus i played it to the end(i don't do that with many games)
[HORRIBLE DIFFICULTY BALANCING, HORRIBLE GAME-PLAY IMPLEMENTATION, and literally a HORRIBLY BACKWARDS PLOT WITH HOLES ALL OVER]
Uncharted 1 and 2- Pffffft, really, really good games there, great experience and that is shown by the community.
[POOR BALANCING, POOR IMPLEMENTATION, and while the plot is good the system is designed to make the puzzles the secondary while the shooting which SUCKS is the primary and that literally kills the game]
inFamous- HEATHEN! HEATHEN IN OUR MIDSTS!
[This game even got poor reviews from some reviewers, it is repetitive, has little that drives you through it, has a moral system that is literally corrupt and illogical, and the gameplay was poorly implemented]
MGS4- Yeah... this is a sort of marmite game, and the cutscenes are unbearably long, but still really enjoyable experience, i've always been a fan of stealth games.
[The only issue is the poor difficulty balancing and implementation of features with little guidance or knowledge on what to do]
Oblivion- I really liked it, and so did a lot of other people, but the escapist seems to be a den of TES hate so i'll just move along.
(I've sunk well over 100 hours into that game, and enjoyed every second)
[Game-breaking bugs, lack of direction, easily boring if caught unaware or unprepared... in fact SO MANY GAME BREAKING BUGS that it is the ONLY GAME that STILL freezes on my 360.]
Team Fortress 2- You ARE trolling, you know that you'll be ripped apart for that right?
I mean, i loved the game and i only had it on console!
[All it was was a reboot and that in itself is why I dislike it, if they added something new to the concept sure but it was just character changes and constant multiplayer, but kudos for it being a multi-only game without a campaign to make sacrifices on, unfortunately it has become shop-a-holic and is corrupt.]
As for the others i left out... never played them, but i respect your opinion, even if it does seem a little trollish.
