xXGeckoXx said:
I too originally thought Australian but heard some much better arguments for British a while ago.
What's your take?
#1 he is DEFINITELY Australian, as in he grew up in the place known as Australia. It is obvious from everything about him.
#2 however the time period (late 1950's to early 1960's) it is actually pretty ambiguous if Australia was considered "British" at that time.
This was the time when an Australian with Australian passport could enter the UK as a British national without any need for a visa, and vica versa with Brit citizens going to Australia. It was a bit like being Scottish, you were Scottish but still British.
But some time in the 1960's that changed, Australia and the UK parted ways significantly and completely "devolved" became separate country with only a ceremonial Monarch in common.
The seeds of this seemed to have been sewn in WWII, where the Royal Navy and entire British War Cabinet admitted they had no capacity to defend Australia from Japanese invasion, it was entirely up to them. In the end it was the Americans who took up the vital logistical role to keep Australia in the fight. Most of the UK's fighting (English/Scottish/Ulster/etc) against the Japanese was an horribly drawn out conflict in Burma to prevent them invading India, that was mostly a stalemate with neither side making a strategic breakthrough for years. A vital conflict still for denying the bounty of India from Japan.
It was a fraught relationship between the yanks and ANZAC (common term for Australia-New-Zealand military alliance) made worse by the the forced abandonment by the UK and culture clashes with United States. When the Vietnam War came around, Australia and New Zealand joined that conflict assisting the Americans while Britain abstained from any support at all. So it seems the allegiances had changed though Australia (and New Zealand) today are very much more independent in so many ways they have pulled away from Britain, Australia and any other "greater" powers and is a regional power in itself.
Compare and contrast with the Falkland Island that the United kingdom WAS able to solely militarily defend from invasion. Falklanders explicitly consider themselves "British" and always have, especially since the Falklands War.