zehydra said:
RazadaMk2 said:
zehydra said:
RazadaMk2 said:
I dunno, The threads on both Moviebobs latest video and the latest Jimquisition video both make me feel sick. I think it was someone declaring that homosexuality was a mental illness that did it. Oh, the fact that "White Knight" exists as a derogatory term. It both confuses AND sickens me.
Oh, and to inject socialism into this?
The fact that if the worlds richest 100 people all gave away half of their wealth poverty could be abolished within a year.
The fact that whilst writing this many children have died of a mixture of starvation, malaria, diahorrea... I am not even going to get into it. And that could be stopped. But noone cares.
World of Warcraft players sign away 10 pounds a month to play a rather boring (Be honest with yourself) game yet it is almost impossible to get someone to give 7 pounds a month to a charity.
To keep food prices up many nations burn excess food or recycle it into fertilizer/pig meal.
In an effort to make money, futures trading on staple food sources has directly led to the deaths of many thousands yet those responsible have not committed a crime.
It is not a crime to commit homeopathic fraud. By "Homeopathic Fraud" I mean claiming that a homeopathic remedy works better than a similarly administered placebo.
The man directly responsible for tens of thousands (If not hundreds of thousands) of deaths in Africa for claiming VITAMIN PILLS worked better than anti-retrovirals to treat HIV AIDS.
You know what?
I am done.
I would like to mention that
"gave away half of their wealth poverty could be abolished within a year."
isn't true, simply due to rules about how economic value works.
But I think I get what you mean. You don't want to see poverty abolished, you want to see hunger abolished, no?
Speaking as a commie I would rather see the world economic system abolished. But hunger would be a good start.
well, you can't abolish value or worth, so wealth is gonna go somewhere.
But you can change societal values so people give different, less tangible, things value. Such as knowledge or emotional capacity. I believe the rich have a duty to help those less well off, like I believe every man has a duty to his fellow man. The original point I made was that if they worlds richest men were to invest half of their money in improving the lot of their fellow man they could pull millions if not hundreds of millions of people above the poverty line and into an acceptable standard of living.
We live in an unjust system. People make money from the misery of others. From the cunts who raised the prices of staple food crops to people working to build bigger bombs, people are making lives worse for many for the personal profit of the few. That is the nature of the capitalist system. Somewhere down the line someone has to be treated badly.
This is wrong.
So!
In summary!
You CAN change the nature of value and, as a result, abolish what some see to be valuable. You can redistribute the wealth of the world in a way that is fair to all. And even if you do not want to do that, with the worlds current resources it is criminal that we allow millions to die so that the rich can get richer.