lets see, 343 is really the same heads as bungie, and this news is coming from some website i know not of, and no word of it on rooster teeth...
i call bullshit.
i call bullshit.
Thats rather melodramatic... A few spawn options changes and suddenly its a whole new game? Riiiight.TheBobmus said:If you're going to change all the core mechanics of a game, use a new IP. You can say change is good but when it drastically reduces the number of players of a 'previous' game because it's apparently a successor, where do you go to play that kind of game? Nowhere, because the identity of that IP has been lost.daveman247 said:-snip-
Reach was a step in the wrong direction, and this is a huge fall that same way.
Na I hated the pistol myself.Kahunaburger said:Hey, man, I know you're sad about the loss of the sniper pistol, but it's time had comeSajuukKhar said:You mean the legacy they killed after the first game when they made the next 6 games utter garbage?Kahunaburger said:Well, I clearly see no reasons to believe that 343 represents Microsoft milking Bungie's franchise for all it's worth without adding to it or living up to its legacy. No, siree...![]()
Is that not the fault of the devs who aped that aspect into their games and not the fault of the game that started it?SajuukKhar said:that and Halo made 2 weapon limits and regen health popular, such BS.
It is the cause of the cause and thus the root cause of the problem. They could have stuck with the good stuff but they didn't.fozzy360 said:Is that not the fault of the devs who aped that aspect into their games and not the fault of the game that started it?SajuukKhar said:that and Halo made 2 weapon limits and regen health popular, such BS.
What Halo: anniversary?Vigormortis said:Me: Good God, Call of Duty is literally ruining the industry. It's grimy paws have been getting into almost every other online game out there. Even games that are nothing like COD.
Someone else: Nonsense. Call of Duty isn't ruining the industry. It's just a popular game. It's not like sci-fi games or such things are trying to copy it.
*reads list of features in the OP*
Me: Um...you were saying?
I've given up on trying to find a reason to play on Xbox Live. (let alone my 360 at this point) Seriously just a few steps away from just selling it all. The "exclusives" on that console are really not worth it any more.
Besides, need I remind anyone of the awful, awful, awful "first outing" by 343?
What? A LOT of people like the flavor text of every multiplayer map in Halo... It gave the fights a fun context, and great flavor. However, the Text thing is just you needing a tinfoil hat.IBlackKiteI said:It's not a whole lot of information, but to be honest I think most of it sounds pretty bad.
Firefight was cool. We don't need some potentially lameass story driven mode instead, we already have the campaign. While there are some who like it, how many people want to have their coop game crammed full of story related fluff and a specific plotline anyway?
Man, this was one of the reasons Halo multiplayer was so great. You didn't need to worry about story crap, you just jumped in and shot up a bunch of dudes for wearing a different colour, often resulting in damn good fun. Now it seems they want story to seep through every part of the game, multiplayer too.
Crap, maybe it'd be like spawning in a wall in Forge and then having a big text window come up and detail that particular type of wall's history.
Not OP as hell - It's a tactical advantage like Armor Lock or Jetpacks. Sneaking's not useless - you just have to be aware that someone might have Forerunner Vision and change up your game. As for the railgun.... I HIGHLY doubt it - The Forerunner Vision thing is a defensive/intelligence armor upgrade, and completely useless against a rocket to the face.Forerunner vision? Aside from sounding stupid it'll be OP as hell. Sneaking will be rendered useless. I wouldn't be surprised if there's some sort of railgun type thing they'll put in the game that can one hit kill through walls to go along with it, and I'll bet it can see cloaked players too.
Wait, you're complaining about the UNSC having virtual reality simulations? You mean, like the Virtual Reality simulations the U.S. military is developing? And they're fighting "Each Other" because another soldier is better for training against than an artificial intelligence attempting to mimic another species' combat ability (And that's what the SpartanOPS is for anyway).Spartan points? Seriously? Are they going to do that thing where they give stuff in their game silly names pertaining to other stuff in the game to try and make it sound cooler and original?
Why Reds and Blues fight, this is completely retarded. So the UNSC has the technology and capability to replicate a combat situation virtually down to the last detail but for decades got their ASSES handed to them by an alien empire primarily armed with laughably ineffective weapons and vehicles, lead by dumbasses and whose military forces are mostly comprised of stupid midgets?
Also why are they fighting each other? Seeing as there's only what, a few hundred million humans left, you'd think the UNSC would consider the real potential future threat to be the Flood/Covenant/Alien whatever. When you think about it, it would make more sense for the SIV's to fight against non-human enemies, which would mean that a VR Firefight type mode which the Spartan's fight aliens in would make perfect sense!
Mixing up the routine is a bad thing? What?Random weapon spawns? The worst of the lot. I don't think anyone even needs to explain how horrid this will be.
Meh, if they make the respawn points varied enough and far enough apart, I'd find this to be a benefit.Instant respawn? Bad, considering the absolute suckyness of Halo's spawns.
They've not messed anything up yet.Join games in progress? This would be great if it weren't for how Halo multiplayer matches are and have always been designed. They'll have to revamp the entire matchmaking system for it to work well.
None of these issues are exactly game breakers for me personally, but if they've already messed up this much stuff how much stuff will they ultimately mess up in the finished game? I think I'll wait for a couple more trailers.
Maybe not comparatively speaking, but the "additions" added in by 343 that weren't already a part of the game Bungie built were lazy and uninspired. Anniversary was basically Halo: CE with an awful new paint job and Reach-multiplayer-slim crowbarred together. Even then, 343 didn't really do it well.SajuukKhar said:What Halo: anniversary?Vigormortis said:Me: Good God, Call of Duty is literally ruining the industry. It's grimy paws have been getting into almost every other online game out there. Even games that are nothing like COD.
Someone else: Nonsense. Call of Duty isn't ruining the industry. It's just a popular game. It's not like sci-fi games or such things are trying to copy it.
*reads list of features in the OP*
Me: Um...you were saying?
I've given up on trying to find a reason to play on Xbox Live. (let alone my 360 at this point) Seriously just a few steps away from just selling it all. The "exclusives" on that console are really not worth it any more.
Besides, need I remind anyone of the awful, awful, awful "first outing" by 343?
It wasn't that bad.
Rudimentary creatures of blood and flesh, you touch my mind, fumbling in ignorance, incapable of understanding.
The pattern has repeated itself more times than you can fathom. New video games rise, evolve, advance, and at the apex of their glory they are extinguished. Halo was not the first. They did not create the Fandom. They did not forge the fires of nerdrage. They merely found them - the legacy of my kind.
Don Savik said:snip
actually i swore a saw an elite in a halo 4 screenshot, i cant find it but don't count them out yetGorilla Gunk said:No Elites in multiplayer?
PASS.