Well, printmaking can get pretty damn technical too, but that doesn't stop the medium.ItsAChiaotzu said:Well obviously, how much you enjoy the music isn't based at all on how it was produced, so logically to the listener, it doesn't matter if it was an analogue instrument or a computer. But, what people could quite legitimately argue, is that it is much harder to put one's emotions into a computer based piece of music, than it is to express oneself through the articulations of their playing an analogue instrument.Erana said:I enjoy chiptune, but even most gamers seem to dismiss it as nothing but NES nostalgia.
And even then, few people who acknowledge that chiptune outside of old games exists, its mostly chiptune trying to be something its not, or bad automated 8-bit covers.
What just kills me the most, though, is when people insist that no sounds produced by a computer can ever compare to an analogue instrument.
I'm sorry, but no. I'm not that musically inclined, but I'm into fine art, and even there, analog is not God.
Different people have different minds for art- some can get really technical with overarching plans, and others just like to jump right in and be right in on the action.
And what about composers? There's only so much say they can have in the creation of the sound itself just through their written music.