The 40 Year Old Virgin Who Knocked Up Sarah Marshall and Felt Superbad About It....*throws up*

Recommended Videos

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
The Verizon guy gag was good for a chuckle, and they did hit all the Apatow movie tropes (even though I don't think said tropes are funny).

Overall, a well-produced, reasonably clever trailer...for a movie that will likely suck even harder than all those weak-sauce Apatow movies do. But that's like saying Weird Al was better in the Eighties. Source material is everything in parody.
 

Sad Robot

New member
Nov 1, 2009
314
0
0
xDarc said:
I already said as much. It's regurgitation. People have been doing it for years. Mel Brooks has done it. The Zuckermans have done it. Tons of people are constantly repackaging and retelling jokes they saw or heard somewhere else. People still do it, because it's still funny, cheap as it may be. Get over it.
There's a whole lot of variety to how you tell a joke. I'm as much a fan of low brow humour as the next guy but I still demand some sense and style and comic timing.
xDarc said:
There's also a flip-side to this. Take 40 year old virgin for instance. Why bother cramming a done to death love story into an excuse to make filthy gags for 90 minutes? Can't I just have 90 minutes of filthy gags?

Lots of people were disappointed with Zombieland because it actually took a fair amount of time to develop the characters. Why be disappointed? Because some people just want 90 minutes of fuggin' zombies.
Maybe it targeted an audience that wanted more than just filthy gags? At any rate, I didn't really like 40 year old virgin that much and I haven't seen Zombieland. However, they are hardly comparable to something like Naked Gun or Airplane! or the stuff Mel Brooks did. Those films actually had some kind of narrative, a point they were making, and an original take on the things they parodied, hence actually being parodies instead of just recreating scenes from other movies in bad taste.
xDarc said:
Some people just really can't be bothered to care about who's joke it is, care about the characters, or care about the plot/writing- at least some of the time. Think of it as Gonzo Pornography, but with less naked people and more jokes.
It's not about "whose joke it is". I can appreciate the fact that not everyone goes to see a film because they want an amazing story or beautiful art direction or ingenious lighting that emphasizes the points the director is trying to make. I think The Hangover was a good film, lots of fun, not much in the way of characters or plot except what was necessary to get the characters to the next funny scene.

But if a comedy doesn't have anything resembling a plot or characters or a point they're trying to make, then where does the comedy come from? Poor retelling of jokes that somebody told better? Poorly recreating iconic scenes? Well, if that's comedy, I just don't find it very funny.
 

MirrorSweep

New member
Apr 17, 2009
205
0
0
TheTygerfire said:
I....what is this I don't....I mean...NO! This is shit! SHIT! SHIT!!

*deep breath*

Okay, you've seen the Disaster Movie trailer, right? That was the most unfunny trailer for a comedy in history, right?

But THIS....THIS is the worst trailer of ANY movie EVER!

Warning: This trailer does have a bit of nudity and really bad sex gags, so don't watch if you're weird about that stuff or whatever.

In fact, let's make this trailer a stupid test. The more times you laugh, the stupider you are.
I didn't laugh at all, so try to match the score!

Why does your opinion automatically make me stupid if I don't agree with it?
I've seen a lot of these kinds of movies, some of them aren't up to par but most of there are pretty funny. This movie isn't even out yet man, perhaps you should go see it before you condemn it?
 

Yuzzi

New member
Jun 7, 2009
117
0
0
The "can you hear me now" -part almost made me giggle. But I still think this might be better than Epic- or Disaster Movie.
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
Wow.....yeah, those parody movies that have been made over the last decade have SUCKED! Seriously. Just awful.
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
Kalezian said:
Onyx Oblivion said:
Well, all the Judd Apatow films that movie makes fun of in the title kinda suck, too.

EDIT: I did laugh once at the end. STAY THIRSTY, MY FRIENDS.


I kinda giggled at the Chris Hansen part, but only because I actually wasn't expecting it.


the rest of the movie can go die in a fire now, since we know the entire story thanks to the trailer.
But of course.
 

SantoUno

New member
Aug 13, 2009
2,583
0
0
What the fuck? Aren't these guys going to be sued or something? They are copying the EXACT same jokes from those three movies.
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
TheTygerfire said:
xDarc said:
I hope that is a real trailer because it was fairly hilarious.
You're the reason these movies keep being made....
Well I have to be honest it is all down to opinion and if you don't like it don't watch it and don't watch trailers for said movies if you don't like that kind of spoofs.

I mean nobody forced to you watch it and make this thread but you did so to create discussion and yes some people myself to an extent actually like these kind of movies BECAUSE they are completely stupid and unrealistic that doesn't make me dumb or a bad person or not like proper comedy either for that matter.

TheTygerfire said:
In fact, let's make this trailer a stupid test. The more times you laugh, the stupider you are.
I didn't laugh at all, so try to match the score!
You can't call people being stupid or being more stupid the more they laugh at this video since you didn't and you don't even have correct grammar.
 

Zorg Machine

New member
Jul 28, 2008
1,304
0
0
scary movie 1 was very good.
scary movie 2 was good.
since then all of these movies have been sh*t
 

Slayer_2

New member
Jul 28, 2008
2,475
0
0
Wow... I laugh at EVERYTHING, and only one part got a small smile out of me (when they showed the fake ID). I definitely wouldn't pay to see this.
 

Sledgimus

New member
Aug 15, 2008
62
0
0
Opinion doesn't enter into it. These films are objectively bad. Anyone who makes them or pays to see them should be ashamed of themselves.