The 5 Most Dissapointing Games of 2011

Recommended Videos

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
I'm not certain of a full 5, but #1: Sword of the Stars 2. I loved the original and was looked forward to that equal all year, more than anything else. It turned out to be an incomplete, broken pile of crap. On release, it simply was not worth buying for any price, even for a fan.

Now, months later and following a ton of patches, it is at least starting to approach what might be considered fun, but it still isn't and now that it is generally playable it's starting to shed light on the fact that being broken isn't the only cause of the game not being fun.
 

vrbtny

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2009
1,959
0
41
M4t3us said:
My feelings exactly, I'm not alone! YAY!
Agreement high-five!

Lumber Barber said:
vrbtny said:
See post #12. Go rage at that dude, I gave as fair a review as I felt. That dude actually defends, I did put it as the most disappointing game of 2011..... what more can i do?
Oh no, I was not being hostile, sorry for giving that impression. Maybe I stated my opinion a bit not so greatly.
Your post was kinda funny. I chuckled a lot at your description of the characters, they were unfortunately, but funnily accurate.
 

endtherapture

New member
Nov 14, 2011
3,127
0
0
Packie_J said:
endtherapture said:
Crysis 2 for me.

I enjoyed Crysis 1 was so much, great, amazing replay value beyond any other shooter I've played, it was just sooo fun.

But then I played Crysis 2, and it was an on the rails shooter. The aliens were ruined, the new suit modes sucked, the story was incomprehensible, and it was just rubbish and horribly overscripted. The freedom of the first game was gone.
In all fairness, Crysis 2 does offer more freedom than your average COD clone so calling it an on-rails shooter is stretching it.

Don't get me wrong, I'm definitely with you it being the most disappointing game of the year. It's simply a step down from Crysis in every single department. It also amuses me how their lead writer was talking shit about other games having shitty writing when his game has the most convoluted, boring, badly written story I have ever seen for a shooter.

In its own, it's a pretty decent game but a sequel to Crysis it's simply not good enough.
The stealth in the game is broken sadly. As soon as you kill one enemy the entire base is on alert. There are no awesome vehicle sections, the sandbox arenas were small compared to the original Crysis.

The aliens were completely ruined. The plot of the first game was functional, it didn't stand out, but I literally cannot understand the story of the secondo one, it's a ridiculous convoluted mess!!

I was so disappointed.
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,508
0
0
Bhaalspawn said:
The only game I played from this year that actually dissapointed me was Baldur's Gate Clone #970 Billion

Most people know it as Elder Scrolls V
Um... what?
Have you ever played Baldur's Gate?
OT: Nothing dissapointed me bought and LOVED Skyrim, AC:R and Deus Ex and loved every single one:)
 

FreebirdLegend

New member
Feb 3, 2011
30
0
0
endtherapture said:
Crysis 2 for me.

I enjoyed Crysis 1 was so much, great, amazing replay value beyond any other shooter I've played, it was just sooo fun.

But then I played Crysis 2, and it was an on the rails shooter. The aliens were ruined, the new suit modes sucked, the story was incomprehensible, and it was just rubbish and horribly overscripted. The freedom of the first game was gone.
I know how you feel. Crysis 1 was just absolutely amazing, but Crysis 2 was terrible. It felt like they were trying to get the large call of duty audience to play it (killstreaks come on). It being in the city as well was just terrible in a way. Also the fact they were looking at the console more than the PC version of it. Honestly if they make another Crysis they absolutely need to look back on what made Crysis 1 great.
 

Sarah Kerrigan

New member
Jan 17, 2010
2,670
0
0
#5; Resistance 3-Don't even know why I preordered it. Lapse of judgement. Not worth it. Resistance 2 did everything better.
#4; Killzone 3-Story got me, gameplay didn't.
#3; Duke Nukem Forever-Need I speak more?
#2; Battlefield 3-Gameplay and glitches made me wanna murder someone. Story was boring as shit.
#1; The 3DS as a whole-Yes, some good games so far, but I only own two of them due to the rest being pure crap. Plus, my system broke after just two months, the bottom screen breaking. Now it's only good as a damn DS instead.
 

Random Argument Man

New member
May 21, 2008
6,011
0
0
I didn't think DAO2 was that bad.
-Sure, it was less epic.
-The story felt more like a 1.5 than a full sequel. (Can't wait to play that Templar vs Mage war). The next game will probably be more epic in that case.
- It brought Varric. He's the only the dwarf that's not boring and not somekind of Tolkien rip-off dwarf. I hate most dwarven characters.
- Funny Hawke was funny.

Anyhow, the only game that I've been disapointed so far was LoZ: Skyward sword. Am I the only one who thinks there's too much story and not enough gameplay?
 

Pandabearparade

New member
Mar 23, 2011
962
0
0
Hammeroj said:
5) Portal 2. The only thing the game achieves is being cute. The puzzles are designed for 8 year olds,
A few of the puzzles were a lot harder than the ones in Portal 1, for me. I just don't see this criticism as anything more than veiled boasting, or perhaps trolling.

2) The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. Lazy and shallow to the point of being an insult. From removing stats to the shitty itemization and crafting systems and the horrible UI, everything about it screams "lowest common denominator".
Lazy? Not a claim you're going to be able to back up on cross-examination, mate. There is so much content in Skyrim it's ridiculous. The game has some big problems, but lack of ambition just wasn't one of them.

Removing stats? Did you -really- like the stat system in Oblivion that required you to grind up secondary skills rather than primary skills to actually remain viable later in the game?

Most people didn't like that. Maybe taking a cleaver to all the stats wasn't the right way to go (and it wasn't, in my view), but Elder Scrolls has historically had an enormous amount of stat-bloat. Being tedious and complex doesn't make a system good, and being forced to stand around for an hour taking a beating to raise your endurance +5 when you level is just bad design.

1) The Witcher 2. Console RPG that hides its true nature behind shiny graphics. Coming from CDProjekt, it broke my heart.
I'm not sure what you were expecting, here. The game delivered almost exactly what it was advertised as. Perhaps be more specific?

Honestly, with five disappointments this good I'm wondering if you can name a game that actually satisfied you?
 

SextusMaximus

Nightingale Assassin
May 20, 2009
3,508
0
0
Bhaalspawn said:
SextusMaximus said:
Bhaalspawn said:
The only game I played from this year that actually dissapointed me was Baldur's Gate Clone #970 Billion

Most people know it as Elder Scrolls V
Um... what?
Have you ever played Baldur's Gate?
Why no. I have NEVER played Baldur's Gate. I picked the name "Bhaalspawn" as my username because I thought it sounded cool >_<

OF COURSE I've played Baldur's Gate. And every fantasy RPG since then (Including Elder Scrolls 3-5) has been trying very hard to BE Baldur's Gate.

I was insulting a bad game. Skyrim was an eight hour bore.
Well I assumed you had anyway, it was clear I was making the point that I don't believe Skyrim is remotely like Baldur's gate and it's not trying to be either? If you'd have said ANY fantasy MMO (okay, most), the Dragon Age games (these have an excuse to be fair), whatever, I'd have agreed with you - but I can't see how Skyrim (or Morrowind / Olivion) is remotely like it.

HOW DID IT ONLY TAKE YOU 8 HOURS?

[sub]Yeah, btw, I am being partly facetious - spend as much time as you like disliking Skyrim, I just don't see the similarity to Baldur's Gate.[/sub]
 

Anthony Wells

New member
May 28, 2011
363
0
0
alright. *cracks knuckles*
5.Skyrim
4.Infamous2
3.Team Ico collection
2.modern warfare 3
1. Hyperdimmension neptunia


Now why did i choose those five specifically... because they were the only five games of 2011 i bought. (not counting indie titles and humble bundles which im not gonna look through.) so as a result those five games are the only ones i bought so they are the only ones i enjoyed and are also simaltaniously the only five i was dissapointed by. sad truth isnt it? honestly i do have a few dissapointments with those games like skyrim had the lag problem, infamous 2 ended, shadow of the collosus horse controls are balls and assface mcgee (the main character)eh..he just rubs me the wrong way. ICO is great so far though, modern warfare 3 was too short and multiplayer maps too small, and Hyperdimmension Neptunia had a disappointing way of navigating and text too small. right so those are my games and the gripes about them.
 

Ddgafd

New member
Jul 11, 2009
475
0
0
DaSpoony said:
My most disappointing game was Ratchet and Clank: All 4 One


I doubt most people on the Escapist actually give a damn about the R&C series, but to me, this was a huge let down. Don't get me wrong, it looked awful from the second it was announced, but somehow, it managed to go downhill from there...
This. The description is spot on. I haven't even finished the damn thing because the last boss has way too much health and I can't bother wasting that much time on it.

Other picks:

Brink
The Baconing(I'm guessing most of you haven't heard of this one, it's a PSN and XBLA(IIRC) title)

Suprisingly, RAGE isn't on this list, mostly because I wasn't expecting much from it anyway.
 

south-base-spartan

New member
Jun 30, 2011
15
0
0
blackops was pretty disappointing in my opinion. we were promised a wedding cake and given a ritz cracker with icing, which in a way is almost worse that a steaming pile of shit. just because it shows that the developers were lazy and just wanted to make a generic filler fps. and we have seen great things from the company, so it doesn't make sense that a game with no tether to previous titles made by an insanely well funded company, with a pretty decent engine was so mediocre. at least for most other titles of the yer they were trying something new, and black ops didn't even do that.

It was honestly a slap in the face by treyarch because it came across, at least to me, as "we made this because someone will pay for it and we like money". I mean, Brink was made by a company that was trying something that they had never tried and was using some pretty new stuff, so it has an excuse for being god awful. and no doubt that brink was significantly worse in this case, but that's like comparing a five year old that draws a stick figure and then lets say Michelangelo drawing a boxy, hastily colored in bubble person. not that Bethesda is comparatively that bad or that treyarch is comparatively that good, but the principle of the simile stays the same one did their best at something new and failed, the other could have done better but purposely did mediocre and sold it to you for $60.
 

south-base-spartan

New member
Jun 30, 2011
15
0
0
Sarah Kerrigan said:
#2; Battlefield 3-Gameplay and glitches made me wanna murder someone. Story was boring as shit.
you mean multiplayer glitches,correct? because if so, yes, so much yes, and to a lesser extent, yes even if you didn't
 

Pandabearparade

New member
Mar 23, 2011
962
0
0
Hammeroj said:
but the only challenge the game contained was in its lack of direction (the "where does the portal go" problem).
Well I can't deny that, sadly.

By the way, the word "trolling" is something that can easily turn off people from responding.
Right you are. I apologize.

Haven't played Oblivion, but I'll tell you what. Having level 100 in two-handed weapons, then picking up a one-handed hammer and dealing no damage does not make sense.
If you haven't played Oblivion I don't think it's fair to say that Skyrim has been 'dumbed down' on anything, because 'dumbed down' implies you had a smart starting point that was hit with the retard stick. Oblivion was a really, really stupid starting point that was hit with a slightly-less-stupid stick. So it was, if anything, smarted up! Or at very least made less tedious and broken.

Though I agree that a grandmaster one-handed swordsman shouldn't get his ass handed to him by a bandit the moment he decides to pick up a greatsword. Though that is something that has been present in every single Elder Scrolls game that I've played (admittedly that's only the last three).

The equivalent of that would be a master mage being completely shit with another school of magic, just because the way the skill system works.
That's actually how it does work with a mage, amusingly. A mage with 100 destruction skill who has never summoned something will drain his mana bar summoning a daedric ass-scratcher.

It's literally dumbing down the game, and, since this is pretty much a trend, the whole genre. And it removes what little scaling stats provided, meaning your combat capabilities cap at around level 30, which is literally before you've exhausted half the game's content.
Again, it might be dumb, but you can't say it's 'dumbing down' because it didn't have a lofty, genius starting point. From Oblivion, Skyrim has been smarted up. Oblivion was the dumb drunk of the family, Skyrim is the trendy emo boy who's pretending to be something he isn't to seem cool.

Damn that's a bad analogy. I'm keeping it anyway.

I'd prefer the design to be not as one dimensional as it is. There are always systems to come up with that include stats and don't rely on grinding. Like, oh my god, this is gonna blow your mind, being able to assign stat points yourself! Holy fuck! That way you can shape the character in your preferred direction and keep getting stronger throughout the whole game.
Oh, I agree completely. I'm not saying Skyrim's leveling system is perfect, just a vast improvement from Oblivion, though I do strongly approve of the lack of a class system and just leveling based upon the skills you use.


The result is a game that looks great, but plays like it's been developed by complete amateurs.
Harsh, but you're entitled to your opinion.
 

Tiswas

New member
Jun 9, 2010
638
0
0
5: One Piece Gigant Battle 2: Not a terrible game at all. The problem stems from the first game missing out on key important characters (including a third of the main cast), the second one added them in. Then added a bunch of characters who have A: Done nothing in the main series and B: Not even fought. It's like they picked the chars people wanted and looked up Yaoi fanart for the rest. You then realised you've paid twice for a game for the chars who should have been in the first one anyways.

4: Duke Nukem Forever: I think this was mainly due to the hype and the fact that people bought it because it was legendary

3: Dragon Age 2: moving right along

2: L.A Noire A decent movie. But not a game. Clearly the only reason it got hype was due to the visuals and the word rockstar plastered onto the box. Not to mention how the game felt unfinished......rectified by expensive DLC to complete the missing parts of the game

1: Skyrim. Lets get things straight first. I only own a PS3. The game may be great and all on the PC but I don't own a gameworthy PC. The PS3 shouldn't have been released in the condition it was in. I stuck with the terrible framerate, constant crashes (anywhere from 3 minutes to 1 hour of playtime.), falling through the scenery and other bad glitches and finally got the Platinum. The remains of the game just felt like a huge mess of fetch quests (not a problem usually considering I loved Xenoblade and Skyward Sword) and boring, tedious, bland Keeps/Caves. I don't know where people are saying it's 400 hours of fun. After about 10 hours in the game I felt i'd seen the full thing.