The Atrocities of Your National Heritage... This is a Fun Thread! :D

Recommended Videos

Meight08

*Insert Funny Title*
Feb 16, 2011
817
0
0
We have not shared the frikandel with the world.

Deep fried sausages made of a mixture of chicken horse and pig meat scraps, combined with chemicals.
This thing should not be tasty or be so good.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
Matthew94 said:
Helmholtz Watson said:
Matthew94 said:
The latter. Why do you want it when the people who actually live in the nation are against it, from all walks of life.
Because I don't want Ireland to become like Korea and be in some permanent limbo where they are forever divided. I rather go for the brutish(and I do realize that it is brutish) way that the US also took when the Confederacy tried to separate from the Union. I mean do you honestly think that if we waited until NI agreed, would there be a united Ireland in our lifetime?
Wow, you think the situation is like Korea? How ignorant to the situation you are!

The relations between Ireland and NI are absolutely fine and are "getting better" all the time. Seriously, this is getting silly.
What? No, I said I don't ever want them to progress to such a state, not that I think that they are currently in such a state.
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
American Indian so...I guess not stopping you when we had the chance?

Sorry, rest of the world...we didn't know.

Okay, okay. I'm just kidding.

The fact of the matter is that it is a dying culture and that sucks because there's virtually no attempt to save it.
And yes, there is still a lot of unfair treatment of the Indian tribes on a State and Federal level.

With that being said. In terms of preying on white guilt, I think the reason that there's not much discussion of that particular chapter of our history is that for the most part we don't hold a nationalistic grudge about it.

I think that for the most part we understand that whatever your ancestors may have done to our ancestors, it doesn't translate into you having done anything to me.

Although while I've got your ear. To those of you with kids. Please stop dressing them up as "Injuns" for Halloween. It's really quite offensive.
 

VeryOddGamer

New member
Feb 26, 2012
676
0
0
Finland here, and well... It hasn't been an independant country for very long, so we haven't had much time for any real atrocities.
Well, we were kind of allied with Germany during World War 2. But even there we didn't assist them very much.
If I remember correctly, we treated POW's pretty badly too.
But no, we haven't committed any real crimes towards humanity... Yet.
 

Gabanuka

New member
Oct 1, 2009
2,372
0
0
England: Take your pick. Personally I think the worse is the slavery and the claiming of lands because we put a flag down.

HUngary: Ummmm, we we're the submissive side of the Austo-Hungarian empire.
 

The Tibballs

New member
Jun 3, 2012
64
0
0
GeneralTwinkle said:
Then after we had settled in, the stolen generation, where we kidnapped black kids so they would learn to live in a "normal" society, rather then an aboriginal one.
Smooth moves, Australia.
Yeah, because trying to integrate natives into a more advanced society and giving them access to modern technologies and medicines instead of killing and/or enslaving them was a horrible thing to do... I for one am happy that the "white oppressors" came and gave me all the benefits I enjoy on a daily basis.
If you really think about it, it was a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't for the British, especially if you consider the time period and also try if you will to imagine the kinds of things that could have happened to the Aboriginal population if Australia had of been colonised by a less tolerant/forgiving country.
 

General Twinkletoes

Suppository of Wisdom
Jan 24, 2011
1,426
0
0
The Tibballs said:
GeneralTwinkle said:
Then after we had settled in, the stolen generation, where we kidnapped black kids so they would learn to live in a "normal" society, rather then an aboriginal one.
Smooth moves, Australia.
Yeah, because trying to integrate natives into a more advanced society and giving them access to modern technologies and medicines instead of killing and/or enslaving them was a horrible thing to do... I for one am happy that the "white oppressors" came and gave me all the benefits I enjoy on a daily basis.
If you really think about it I was a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't for the British, especially if you consider the time period and also try if you will to imagine the kinds of things that could have happened to the Aboriginal population if Australia had of been colonised by a less tolerant/forgiving country.
They could have very easily given them medicine and better schooling without kidnapping people and making them forget about their entire family.
They could have helped aborigines without ruining the entire culture and kidnapping children. How can you possibly justify that, even if it did make some improvements? Those improvements could have been far better achieved by just helping, not abolishing that society.
 

DirtyJunkieScum

New member
Feb 5, 2012
308
0
0
mike1921 said:
Which is still just going "IT'S BAD WHEN COUNTRIES ARE SEPERATED" with no reason and logic to it, and then you made some argument that the american revolution didn't split britain into two countries (even though some British owned land was a new country and some was still the old one). Like I'm not seeing anything substantial here.
That's pretty much his entire argument. There is no logic to it other than some sort of romantic notion that people should all get along and that a small piece of land surrounded by water makes an excellent way of determining which people should all claim a single undivided heritage and STFU and have the government they're given goddamit. Basically a Hollywood fantasy. There is nothing substantial.

However, he is clearly a wizard, because he got this right:

Helmholtz Watson said:
I'm going to catch shit for this, but it could be argued that the past IRA were freedom fighters, not terrorist.
Maybe we should listen to him, he could use his magical powers to sort everything out. Create Irish Union then brainwash everyone into being happy and united.

Also general congrats to everyone involved for only adding an extra page while I was gone.

Finally I am going to destroy this thread by claiming that uniting Ireland would be pretty much the same as Nazi Germany's annexation of the Sudetenland, Austria, and those parts of Poland that used to be Germany, not to mention their sterling work in trying to reunite the single Germanic people of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Britain that had been cruelly separated by political divisions for so long, leading to a state much like that in Korea where war could break out any time (like it actually did in mainland Europe. Twice). Hitler really was the great uniter, such a shame he didn't have Helmoltz' wizard powers or he might have succeeded in his noble aims.

No really, I totally think that, a people should be united whether they want to or not
Look how happy they are!
Godwins law Bitches!!! (OK, I know it's a little crass calling it on yourself but these are desperate times we live in)
 

Ninjamedic

New member
Dec 8, 2009
2,569
0
0
DirtyJunkieScum said:
Finally I am going to destroy this thread by claiming that uniting Ireland would be pretty much the same as Nazi Germany's annexation of the Sudetenland, Austria, and those parts of Poland that used to be Germany, not to mention their sterling work in trying to reunite the single Germanic people of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Britain that had been cruelly separated by political divisions for so long, leading to a state much like that in Korea where war could break out any time (like it actually did in mainland Europe. Twice). Hitler really was the great uniter, such a shame he didn't have Helmoltz' wizard powers or he might have succeeded in his noble aims.
Actually, given De Valera's track record, that analogy becomes nightmarishly accurate......
 

The Tibballs

New member
Jun 3, 2012
64
0
0
GeneralTwinkle said:
The Tibballs said:
GeneralTwinkle said:
Then after we had settled in, the stolen generation, where we kidnapped black kids so they would learn to live in a "normal" society, rather then an aboriginal one.
Smooth moves, Australia.
Yeah, because trying to integrate natives into a more advanced society and giving them access to modern technologies and medicines instead of killing and/or enslaving them was a horrible thing to do... I for one am happy that the "white oppressors" came and gave me all the benefits I enjoy on a daily basis.
If you really think about it I was a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't for the British, especially if you consider the time period and also try if you will to imagine the kinds of things that could have happened to the Aboriginal population if Australia had of been colonised by a less tolerant/forgiving country.
They could have very easily given them medicine and better schooling without kidnapping people and making them forget about their entire family.
They could have helped aborigines without ruining the entire culture and kidnapping children. How can you possibly justify that, even if it did make some improvements? Those improvements could have been far better achieved by just helping, not abolishing that society.
The problem with that thinking is that it's unrealistic. You can't colonise an area and leave the existing culture 100% intact, it just can't be done and those countries that have tried to do so almost always end up with severe oppression from one side or the other or multi-generational civil wars. Both of which I'm sure you will agree would have been worse than what happened here in Australia.
But I will concede that it could've been handled better, but only if we knew then what we know now, hindsight being 20/20 and all that.
 

JochemHippie

Trippin' balls man.
Jan 9, 2012
464
0
0
Probably slavery too x3
Or Indonesia, fuck if I know what the dutch have done for horrors that have been swept under the carpet.
 

The Tibballs

New member
Jun 3, 2012
64
0
0
Helmholtz Watson said:
I'm going to catch shit for this, but it could be argued that the past IRA were freedom fighters, not terrorist
One mans terrorist is an others freedom fighter.
 

thespyisdead

New member
Jan 25, 2010
756
0
0
i was born in ukraine, but my moms russian, and i know more of my russian relatives, than my ukrainian ones

i think that the soviet union did quite terrible things, but nothing compares to Stalin. just shows you what a little bit of paranoia can do. pre and post stalin eras are also not free from attrocities, but i feel, that that was the worst of times for the slavic people.
 

Moonlight Butterfly

Be the Leaf
Mar 16, 2011
6,157
0
0
Supertegwyn said:
The Welsh have done nothing wrong.

Ever.
Actually the Welsh were pretty badass back in the early 900 AD's but you were up against the vikings so we will let you off.

I'm English, I'm sure that pretty much speaks for itself. :S



(Hell, my ancestor was a god damn privateer)
 

DirtyJunkieScum

New member
Feb 5, 2012
308
0
0
Glademaster said:
DirtyJunkieScum said:
Ninjamedic said:
Actually, given De Valera's track record, that analogy becomes nightmarishly accurate......
I knew I was right.
How did you manage to put Ninjamedic's quote in someone else's post?
I...I don't know. Maybe I'm some sort of wizard too?

In fact...I totally am. Have another look. See? I just made you think I had done that with my magical wizard powers when actually I got the quote completely right.