What? No, I said I don't ever want them to progress to such a state, not that I think that they are currently in such a state.Matthew94 said:Wow, you think the situation is like Korea? How ignorant to the situation you are!Helmholtz Watson said:Because I don't want Ireland to become like Korea and be in some permanent limbo where they are forever divided. I rather go for the brutish(and I do realize that it is brutish) way that the US also took when the Confederacy tried to separate from the Union. I mean do you honestly think that if we waited until NI agreed, would there be a united Ireland in our lifetime?Matthew94 said:The latter. Why do you want it when the people who actually live in the nation are against it, from all walks of life.
The relations between Ireland and NI are absolutely fine and are "getting better" all the time. Seriously, this is getting silly.
Yeah, because trying to integrate natives into a more advanced society and giving them access to modern technologies and medicines instead of killing and/or enslaving them was a horrible thing to do... I for one am happy that the "white oppressors" came and gave me all the benefits I enjoy on a daily basis.GeneralTwinkle said:Then after we had settled in, the stolen generation, where we kidnapped black kids so they would learn to live in a "normal" society, rather then an aboriginal one.
Smooth moves, Australia.
They could have very easily given them medicine and better schooling without kidnapping people and making them forget about their entire family.The Tibballs said:Yeah, because trying to integrate natives into a more advanced society and giving them access to modern technologies and medicines instead of killing and/or enslaving them was a horrible thing to do... I for one am happy that the "white oppressors" came and gave me all the benefits I enjoy on a daily basis.GeneralTwinkle said:Then after we had settled in, the stolen generation, where we kidnapped black kids so they would learn to live in a "normal" society, rather then an aboriginal one.
Smooth moves, Australia.
If you really think about it I was a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't for the British, especially if you consider the time period and also try if you will to imagine the kinds of things that could have happened to the Aboriginal population if Australia had of been colonised by a less tolerant/forgiving country.
That's pretty much his entire argument. There is no logic to it other than some sort of romantic notion that people should all get along and that a small piece of land surrounded by water makes an excellent way of determining which people should all claim a single undivided heritage and STFU and have the government they're given goddamit. Basically a Hollywood fantasy. There is nothing substantial.mike1921 said:Which is still just going "IT'S BAD WHEN COUNTRIES ARE SEPERATED" with no reason and logic to it, and then you made some argument that the american revolution didn't split britain into two countries (even though some British owned land was a new country and some was still the old one). Like I'm not seeing anything substantial here.
Maybe we should listen to him, he could use his magical powers to sort everything out. Create Irish Union then brainwash everyone into being happy and united.Helmholtz Watson said:I'm going to catch shit for this, but it could be argued that the past IRA were freedom fighters, not terrorist.
Actually, given De Valera's track record, that analogy becomes nightmarishly accurate......DirtyJunkieScum said:Finally I am going to destroy this thread by claiming that uniting Ireland would be pretty much the same as Nazi Germany's annexation of the Sudetenland, Austria, and those parts of Poland that used to be Germany, not to mention their sterling work in trying to reunite the single Germanic people of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Britain that had been cruelly separated by political divisions for so long, leading to a state much like that in Korea where war could break out any time (like it actually did in mainland Europe. Twice). Hitler really was the great uniter, such a shame he didn't have Helmoltz' wizard powers or he might have succeeded in his noble aims.
The problem with that thinking is that it's unrealistic. You can't colonise an area and leave the existing culture 100% intact, it just can't be done and those countries that have tried to do so almost always end up with severe oppression from one side or the other or multi-generational civil wars. Both of which I'm sure you will agree would have been worse than what happened here in Australia.GeneralTwinkle said:They could have very easily given them medicine and better schooling without kidnapping people and making them forget about their entire family.The Tibballs said:Yeah, because trying to integrate natives into a more advanced society and giving them access to modern technologies and medicines instead of killing and/or enslaving them was a horrible thing to do... I for one am happy that the "white oppressors" came and gave me all the benefits I enjoy on a daily basis.GeneralTwinkle said:Then after we had settled in, the stolen generation, where we kidnapped black kids so they would learn to live in a "normal" society, rather then an aboriginal one.
Smooth moves, Australia.
If you really think about it I was a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't for the British, especially if you consider the time period and also try if you will to imagine the kinds of things that could have happened to the Aboriginal population if Australia had of been colonised by a less tolerant/forgiving country.
They could have helped aborigines without ruining the entire culture and kidnapping children. How can you possibly justify that, even if it did make some improvements? Those improvements could have been far better achieved by just helping, not abolishing that society.
One mans terrorist is an others freedom fighter.Helmholtz Watson said:I'm going to catch shit for this, but it could be argued that the past IRA were freedom fighters, not terrorist
I knew I was right.Ninjamedic said:Actually, given De Valera's track record, that analogy becomes nightmarishly accurate......
How did you manage to put Ninjamedic's quote in someone else's post?DirtyJunkieScum said:I knew I was right.The Tibballs said:Actually, given De Valera's track record, that analogy becomes nightmarishly accurate......
Actually the Welsh were pretty badass back in the early 900 AD's but you were up against the vikings so we will let you off.Supertegwyn said:The Welsh have done nothing wrong.
Ever.
I...I don't know. Maybe I'm some sort of wizard too?Glademaster said:How did you manage to put Ninjamedic's quote in someone else's post?DirtyJunkieScum said:I knew I was right.Ninjamedic said:Actually, given De Valera's track record, that analogy becomes nightmarishly accurate......
I acknowledge and appreciate your Blackadder referenceDaystar Clarion said:Back in my day, when we saw a man in a skirt we shot him and nicked his country.'