/thread. All other traits mentioned are all measured against the rubric of this.aPod said:Wisdom.
If we were all wise we would have no problems.
Moving on...
/thread. All other traits mentioned are all measured against the rubric of this.aPod said:Wisdom.
If we were all wise we would have no problems.
For right now? Then I'd say, the best quality to have is to be rich; a multi-trillionaire.crudus said:Well, the discussion did spur that way. One point brought up was if everyone was selfish then only the strongest could survive, and strong units in a species helps it stay alive and evolve. The counterpoint was being selfless helps provide safety from predators and helps resources gathering and management. I think the original question was for right now though.Paksenarrion said:The best quality? In what situation? I'll go with survival instincts.
You cannot be kind or loving or humble or ambitious if you are dead.
You don't just get wisdom. You seek it. You need curiosity to get it. However, you need to seek it relentlessly to get the good stuff so determination and ambition are important to obtain wisdom as well.Iconoclasm said:/thread. All other traits mentioned are all measured against the rubric of this.aPod said:Wisdom.
If we were all wise we would have no problems.
Moving on...
Why do we need to privatize the space program?Paksenarrion said:For right now? Then I'd say, the best quality to have is to be rich; a multi-trillionaire.
How else can we privatize the space program?
I'll second empathy.Cheery Lunatic said:Japanese.emeraldrafael said:Humility.
Think about. How much better would the world be if everyone just admitted their short comings.
U C WUT I DID THAR.
OT: Empathy. That could, and would, actually lead to world peace.
Schwa-bam! This. Thisthisthisthisthisthisthisthis! If you're kind, people will like you! Not overly so, but just being a nice person.VaudevillianVeteran said:Kindness. What more can I say? A bit more kindness in the world wouldn't hurt.
But that's placing the journey there before the institution. The same can be said about ANYTHING EVER, EVER.crudus said:You don't just get wisdom. You seek it. You need curiosity to get it. However, you need to seek it relentlessly to get the good stuff so determination and ambition are important to obtain wisdom as well.Iconoclasm said:/thread. All other traits mentioned are all measured against the rubric of this.aPod said:Wisdom.
If we were all wise we would have no problems.
Moving on...
agreed. without humor i might go insane, i dealt with enough humorless people in high school that nearly drove me into being an anti-social twat because of it.Nimcha said:Humor. If you take everything too seriously, you can't be happy.
So that we can eventually colonize other planets, and increase our chances of survival in case the Earth becomes uninhabitable.crudus said:Why do we need to privatize the space program?Paksenarrion said:For right now? Then I'd say, the best quality to have is to be rich; a multi-trillionaire.
How else can we privatize the space program?
Because in every work of fiction where there is a Space-faring Corporation, everything turns out A-OK!Paksenarrion said:So that we can eventually colonize other planets, and increase our chances of survival in case the Earth becomes uninhabitable.crudus said:Why do we need to privatize the space program?Paksenarrion said:For right now? Then I'd say, the best quality to have is to be rich; a multi-trillionaire.
How else can we privatize the space program?
Then we can afford to be as nice and as humble and as ambitious as we possibly can.
"263 roweem", CAPTCHA? WTF.
Ok, lets place the journey after the institution then. Lets say you are very wise. What then? Without ambition/drive you don't do anything with it. Without humility nobody will want to listen to you even if you wanted to use it.Iconoclasm said:But that's placing the journey there before the institution. The same can be said about ANYTHING EVER, EVER.
Bottom line is, if we're simply stating traits we find to be "the best" in our species- and that's exactly what we're doing- it is wisdom that judges the best kind of each thing previously mentioned, thereby placing it prior to all other things. What is an appropriate empathetic response? What is funny and why? What is beauty? Is this a good or bad action? What is love (baby don't hurt me)? What is the will and how can I grasp it?
Philosophical questions one and all.
That would start on Earth. We need to get it so we can build stable, enclosed colonies on Earth before we can think about doing it elsewhere. Then we need to figure out how to build those in space(robots). Most of the money is probably going to have to go to the former before the latterPaksenarrion said:So that we can eventually colonize other planets, and increase our chances of survival in case the Earth becomes uninhabitable.
Then we can afford to be as nice and as humble and as ambitious as we possibly can.
"263 roweem", CAPTCHA? WTF.
Don't forget the Concordance Transaction Corporation, the parent company of the USG Ishimura!Iconoclasm said:Because in every work of fiction where there is a Space-faring Corporation, everything turns out A-OK!Paksenarrion said:So that we can eventually colonize other planets, and increase our chances of survival in case the Earth becomes uninhabitable.crudus said:Why do we need to privatize the space program?Paksenarrion said:For right now? Then I'd say, the best quality to have is to be rich; a multi-trillionaire.
How else can we privatize the space program?
Then we can afford to be as nice and as humble and as ambitious as we possibly can.
"263 roweem", CAPTCHA? WTF.
Weyland-Yutani, Lunar Industries, Union Aerospace Corporation... to name a few.
Wisdom is less about doing something or having people believe something (that's politics) than it is about truth. Sure, you'll want to do something with it, but just because you need the drive, will, etc (eyes bleed from it all - insanity is imminent), doesn't mean that those things are superior. If it is the case that those things are superior, you'd need a metric by which to judge humor, will, drive (bleeding eyes - don't sleep) etc... this metric is wisdom. What wisdom means is a completely different matter - no one has asked that question yet (nor should they, because it's a relevant but separate topic).crudus said:Ok, lets place the journey after the institution then. Lets say you are very wise. What then? Without ambition/drive you don't do anything with it. Without humility nobody will want to listen to you even if you wanted to use it.Iconoclasm said:But that's placing the journey there before the institution. The same can be said about ANYTHING EVER, EVER.
Bottom line is, if we're simply stating traits we find to be "the best" in our species- and that's exactly what we're doing- it is wisdom that judges the best kind of each thing previously mentioned, thereby placing it prior to all other things. What is an appropriate empathetic response? What is funny and why? What is beauty? Is this a good or bad action? What is love (baby don't hurt me)? What is the will and how can I grasp it?
Philosophical questions one and all.
Video related maybe?Paksenarrion said:For right now? Then I'd say, the best quality to have is to be rich; a multi-trillionaire.crudus said:Well, the discussion did spur that way. One point brought up was if everyone was selfish then only the strongest could survive, and strong units in a species helps it stay alive and evolve. The counterpoint was being selfless helps provide safety from predators and helps resources gathering and management. I think the original question was for right now though.Paksenarrion said:The best quality? In what situation? I'll go with survival instincts.
You cannot be kind or loving or humble or ambitious if you are dead.
How else can we privatize the space program?