The Big Picture: Captains Courageous

Recommended Videos

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Well, I think this whole thing is fairly reasonable. In short Marvel Comics didn't want a character from a competing company running around calling himself by their company name. When Marvel formed, I don't think they originally foresaw that possibility. I also wouldn't have put it past DC to have been interested in reviving that character in part BECAUSE of that fact.

I honestly don't think that battle is what makes comics wierd. What makes comics wierd in a business aspect is how the companies fight tooth and nail over garbage like this, like any other industry, but then also turn around and do all those crossovers and things like the Amalgam universe stunt, entirely for the fans... or at least they used to, to be honest with things moving into the Hollywood arena I'd be surprised if we see anything major on that level for a while.

To be honest, while "Captain Marvel" is a good piece of Nerd trivia, I think Superman himself has more wierd factoids like that built around him, which less people are aware of. Among other things, Superman himself is arguably ripped off from a science fiction novel called "Gladiator". Remember that the original Superman couldn't fly or anything, he just jumped really high:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gladiator_(novel)

While that was never acknowleged, you'll notice that Marvel has another recurring, but still fairly obscure alien character CALLED "Gladiator" who by and large exhibits all of Superman's powers (including flight as opposed to jumping). Marvel ALSO has an entire alternate universe team called "The Squadran Supreme" who were around long before the entire "Supreme Power" reboot where the characters are all equivilents to members of The Justice League. Indeed during I think "Earth/Universe/Paradise X" (an elseworlds type story series) they also go out of their way to call Hyperion "Earth's Superman" and he also more or less possesses Superman's catalog of powers. Where Gladiator's weakness is his towering ego, Hyperion is vulnerable to a rare radioactive isotope in a stereotypical "kryptonite" type fashion.

Nothing especially relevent, it's just that comic back and forths are legendary. Heck, they even made a huge joke out of the DC/Wildstorm character "Burnout" (from Gen13) and how he's a giant rip off of "The Human Torch". In this case though they eventually had a crossover where Gen 13 met "The Fantastic Four" and Burnout and The Torch went up against each other, with fairly predictable results if you know crossover conventions.

I agree that a lot could be said about Ms. Marvel, however she's one of those characters that I think has been so tainted by feminist politics with stupidity on all sides of the fence that I'd rather they just discontinue Carol Danvers all together. Sad, because she's a fine character, but she just brings enough annoying baggage to the table nowadays that I think it's time to pass the mantle permanantly, and has been for a long time. Look up "The Rape Of Ms. Marvel" at some point, or just some long-term character biographies. It's complicated, and you'll see what I mean. No matter what side of the political spectrum your on the whole situation pretty much defines stupidity.

But then again I'm also one of those people who has gained an inherant dislike of She-Hulk for differant reasons. Another interesting piece of Trivia is when the Avenger "Starfox" who is the Eternal/God "Eros" (god of male sexuality) is pretty much convicted of rape due to his being inherantly irresistable to women. Especially messed up when you find that there is generally less of a problem when women have some kind of power set based around that. In an attempt to be politically profound (Marvel likes to try and do that) they instead basically ruined several of their characters in ways that they just haven't been able to ever overcome in my mind. I mean having She-Hulk practice law in any capacity right now makes me think of where she originally came down there. "Well yes, you are god's gift to women, being well... pretty much a god. But by being too perfect and radiating too much super powered sex appeal you are effectively a rapist. The fact that you can'talways help it, and are pretty much a GOD doesn't change this". Uh-huh ooookaaay then.

Rambling, and well off the point, Bob just got me thinking. Everything else aside, he's good for that.
 

rayen020

New member
May 20, 2009
1,138
0
0
rick jones? oh please start on him. Dive down a rabbit hole in comics and shit starts gettin real. real silly that is.
 

vxicepickxv

Slayer of Bothan Spies
Sep 28, 2008
3,126
0
0
Last I checked, it was Noh-Varr running on the Dark Avengers as Captain Marvel for the Marvel side. The last time I saw Monica Rambeau was Marvel Divas. Before that, she was in Nextwave, which is just silly over the top comic camp awesome. This is one of her teammates.

Let's just put it this way though about DC's Captain Marvel. If push comes to shove, he could obliterate Superman.


Let's NOT do the Ms. Marvel comic. Let's just kill off Carol Danvers and give the title to somebody else. It's such as terrible backstory, you probably wouldn't want to know it.
 

Resin213

New member
Jan 22, 2009
61
0
0
I think Alan Moore's Miracle Man/family parody of Captain Marvel deserves a mention in here, that was a great series, but then once you get into parodies and spin offs well this story could go on for hours.
 

Resin213

New member
Jan 22, 2009
61
0
0
DanDeFool said:
I've got a question. Why is it always "Captian" Superhero? Why not "Admiral" Superhero, or "Marshal" Superhero?

I guess that's another thing that's weird about comics.
Search under 'Marshal Law' hilarious 80's superhero parody comic, I think it was written by Kevin O'neil
 

gundamrx101

New member
Nov 19, 2010
169
0
0
I've always said that DC gets carried away and Marvel has too many status quos. Tis the problem with most comics.
 

Mooly

New member
Jan 24, 2010
22
0
0
Interesting enough, but not really deserving of the big picture outro. This was more of an in depth analysis of comic book minutia than any of the other episodes thus far. I prefer your show when it has some kind of message but I figure episodes like that are hard to come up with, so its reasonable to have a few like this.
 

Varya

Elvish Ambassador
Nov 23, 2009
457
0
0
ANImaniac89 said:
Another great job Bob!!!
But I'm starting to think that maybe "The Big Picture" should just be re-branded as a comics only video series.
A good number of the episodes are already under the "Comic Are Weird" sub-series, and those episodes are not only the most interesting but also the best in terms of information since your really seem to know your shit when it comes to comics.
Just something to think about.
Not that I think you will, but Bob, please don't do that. I love the Comics Are Weird sections but what I love most about the Big Picture is that from week to week, I never know what you will talk about, and that you are not limited to a single subject. Sometimes it's movies, sometimes it's OverThinking about games and sometimes it's about comics. It's great, don't change a thing. And by don't, I mean do, every week.
 

Redd the Sock

New member
Apr 14, 2010
1,088
0
0
I think Noh Varr is still using it unofficially. I mean, with Mar Vell's kids dropping like flies, no one else seems to be competing for it.
 

Monkey King

New member
Mar 29, 2010
19
0
0
Well, if you wanted to do Ms. Marvel, I can think of one really good reason to do it...

[http://www.flickr.com/photos/bellechere/5570032008/]
 

righthanded

New member
Dec 5, 2007
149
0
0
This really just seems like a retread of the ghost busters /real ghost busters episode.

Also, are comics really that weird? Or are most of the just utter shit made for kids/manchildren?

And to repeat myself again, stop with the gimmicks.
 

4173

New member
Oct 30, 2010
1,020
0
0
Therumancer said:
While that was never acknowleged, you'll notice that Marvel has another recurring, but still fairly obscure alien character CALLED "Gladiator" who by and large exhibits all of Superman's powers (including flight as opposed to jumping). Marvel ALSO has an entire alternate universe team called "The Squadran Supreme" who were around long before the entire "Supreme Power" reboot where the characters are all equivilents to members of The Justice League. Indeed during I think "Earth/Universe/Paradise X" (an elseworlds type story series) they also go out of their way to call Hyperion "Earth's Superman" and he also more or less possesses Superman's catalog of powers. Where Gladiator's weakness is his towering ego, Hyperion is vulnerable to a rare radioactive isotope in a stereotypical "kryptonite" type fashion.
Gladiator's powers come from his confidence, his ego is a necessary part of his job.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
burymagnets said:
Bob so has to give Ms. Marvel/Warbird her own episode, that girl's been through so much:(

If anyone's uninformed as to the comic book atrocities comitted against female characters check out Gail Simone's site 'Women in Refrigerators' in which the Green Lantern's girlfriend was.... stuffed into a refrigerator:) Just to give him a reason to go after some guy called 'Major Force' (?) URL: http://www.unheardtaunts.com/wir/index.html

@DanDeFool- which just goes to show there are other military titled supercharacters who don't use 'captain'.

I would like to see the big picture creating a spin-off in 'Bob's Speech Bubble', just sticking with the comic based weirdness. Not that the other episodes aren't excillent, but these comic book background episodes are really interesting and have made comic books a reasonable talking point with my mates:D
Ms. Marvel hasn't been through any more than most other super heroes, it's just that as some of it has involved sexuality (she was impregnated forcibly for one) and a lot of it was done in order to have a political spin, or GIVEN a political spin, which ultimatly wound up ruining the character. Ms. Marvel suffers from attempts to try and turn her into a feminist icon, instead of seeing if she wound up appealing to that audience on her own just by being a decent super hero. Good character, but ruined by Marvel's attempts to get politically profound.

She's up there with the whole "Starfox" incident I mentioned, and how they ruined what was probably over a decade of gradual building to create an awesome "gray" conflict between super heroes where there would be no actual bad guys ( a real "point of view" type conflict ), to engage in a bit of George Bush bashing... yes I am talking about "Civil War" there which pretty much epitomizes everything that is wrong with Marvel's writing staff, it's a shadow of what it could have been, and sold as well as it did I believe because a ot of people saw the potential and the moments of genius, and hoped it would get back on track... but I don't think it ever really did.

There has been plenty of discussion about "femjep" in comic books, with everything from Zatanna (especially early on) getting gagged, to the omni-present damsels in distress. While I suppose you can point a finger at the golden and silver age of comics before the civil liberties movement won most of it's major battles and actually started defining American society, to be honest the portrayal of women in comics has largely grown up as politics and perceptions have. Yes there ARE cases where you can point to some really immature and over the top things, but this isn't an entirely mature genere, and you can point to just as many ridiculous things about male characters. Women just get more press, because people remember the movement and how it gets attention and decide to harp on it.

A good example of this is how you will have people complain about the perfect bodies that female characters tend to have in comic books. The thing is that despite the presentation that isn't one sided, as the guys are typically presented as physically perfect specimins as well. A lot has been said about the portrayal of musclemen in comics, when it can be argued going after that perfect "Charles Atlas" build isn't healthy for a lot of people. Guys who have biceps that are as big around as their heads being viewed by a lot of people as just as bad as women with breasts as big as their heads. Both complaints are ridiculous, the big differance is you don't hear much about the negative influance on little boys, or comments about maturity, unless your listening to some kind of crusade against steroid abuse which some people will argue is encouraged by things like comic characters, and action heroes. Guys like Stallone and Schwartzneggar ripping off their shirts to show off their massive muscles before fighting the bad guys not having helped the matter either, especially when you consider Arnie *WAS* a steroid abuser, albiet he did it before as much as known about it while what he did is illegal now, it wasn't a big deal then.

The point is that people will complain about women in comic books getting bondaged, having perfect builds, torture, and all manner of physical and psychological torments being inflicted on them. The bottom line is that that in the end there is no differance in their treatment, since the guys go through almost all of the same stuff. They get strapped into torture machines, brain washed, put in death traps, get immobilized by their weaknesses, and everything else just as much. Even the rape thing isn't unprecedented because we've had a few cases where the origin of a villain is that it's the child a super hero never realized they had, and whom inherited all of their powers, because they fathered it under duress and were brain washed or whatever (though for both genders the ratings issues make the collection of genetic samples through hair or skin samples or whatever and cloning more common. The point is that there really isn't much actual differance in the treatment of characters. With female super heroes they rescue their boyfriends too. Felicia Hardy has rescued Flash Thompson in her Black Cat guise more than once I believe).
 

RTR

New member
Mar 22, 2008
1,351
0
0
So....
is the whole "Shazam" conundrum the reason why Captain Marvel has no movie yet?
 

Deacon Cole

New member
Jan 10, 2009
1,365
0
0
Country
USA
What, no love for the M.F. Enterprise's Captain Marvel? SPLIT!



Incidentally, Marvel Comics tended to swipe the lapsed trademarks of defunct competitors. Ghost Rider, Doc Strange, and Daredevil being three characters I can think of off the top of my head.





It seems to be one of the differences between Marvel and DC. DC usually acquired the rights to the character and would try to work the character's original history into their take on the character whereas Marvel would just create a new, unrelated character using the same name.
 

OtherSideofSky

New member
Jan 4, 2010
1,051
0
0
Great video. For some reason I like him talking about comics way more than I like him talking about movies.

I've always wanted to keep better informed on American comics, but the absurdly convoluted histories and comparatively high price keep me away from most of the really mainstream titles except for the occasional big event, and I gave up on those recently because they've been terrible for the past several years.