The Big Picture: Magneto Was Right

Recommended Videos

Unesh52

New member
May 27, 2010
1,375
0
0
Dango said:
summerof2010 said:
Dango said:
Not be rude, but I can't help but feel that his point was based off a ridiculous generalization.
Is that generalization "Nerds are superior?" Because that's the one I'm thinking of.

-MEGA SNIP-
Actually the generality was just that all kids who are picked on are out for revenge...
Oh. Well that too.

Cool avy, btw.
 

Razhem

New member
Sep 9, 2008
169
0
0
Well Bob, you are as petty as they come.

Bullies don't pick on nerds because they feel they are superior, they pick on them because they are physically weak and more importantly... SOCIALLY AWKWARD. To put it bluntly, if you were capable of striking out a conversation with anybody in your class and had a likeable way of being from the onset, you probably wouldn't even be looked at as a target unless you made a big enemy of somebody you should not have. I have been bullied myself and the reason wasn't because I was smart, it was because I sucked at sports and was a whinny snot. In my later years I was bullied still, but I didn't even have the "smart" excuse since there were smarter people in my class that had actual social skills worth a damn and were respected and admired in the class.

To put it bluntly, yes, bullying sucks, but don't feed your own power fantasy, because it certainly ain't based on anything realistic.
 

ironlordthemad

New member
Sep 25, 2009
502
0
0
Surely someone who is better than everyone else and wants to prove it would help the people below him/her. That way they show that not only does it show that they are better than the others and know it, but that they are willing to raise (and carry) those who are lesser to a higher level.
But I can see the arguement for joining magneto... I guess thats the point of a truely debatable issue. You can see both points, one good and one bad, the bad option is really tempting (and generally has several leather clad hot women) but restraining yourself from going down the bad path is the true test of being a better person. If you take the bad option, you become a lesser person because you give in to your own base instincts, refusing the easy way shows that you are a better creature because your willing to go up against the hard work to get what you want and what is generally the better solution.
 

thebighead01

New member
Sep 9, 2010
87
0
0
LogicNProportion said:
thebighead01 said:
LogicNProportion said:
thebighead01 said:
LogicNProportion said:
thebighead01 said:
MichaelMaverick said:
I'm seriously considering that I'll stop watching this piss. I've disagreed with Bob on numerous occasions before, but The Big Picture is like a newly-grown tumor on his brain. I can understand the bitterness and overall disinclination from society, but the sheer egotism in this episode was unparalleled to anything I've ever seen in regards to nerd culture.

Bob, you and I and most other people weren't bullied in school because we're different/special/"superior" - it's often part of the reason, but what makes others bully you is the social factor. It's also the reason for why they CAN bully you in the first place - you're not a part of any real social circle, or the one or two friends you do have are shite. And hand in hand together with that goes the fact that you're psychologically weak. You may lull yourself with the comforting thought of your superior intellect if you want to, Bob, but answer me this: does he who is really so goddamn smart allow himself to be continually bullied? Of course not! Again, it's comforting to think that the world is divided into the big bad jocks and the oppressed but good nerds, but back then at least it was the other way around - you were the idiot, and they were smart. Smart and consciously evil to some extent. They started bullying you because they identified the psychological weakness and thus an opportunity for entertainment, and kept going at it because they knew you wouldn't fight back.
I'd be willing to bet my life that this is how it was with at least 95% of us.

AND WE ALL FUCKING DESERVED IT.
dude what is wrong with???
...I actually kind of agree with him.

But, who says that they simply weren't using a sort of predatory reasoning? Many of us were the more meager, they are insecure, so they put us down, etc.
so you agree with him that if you aren't capable of standing up to your bullies you deserve it?
Complacency will always deserve what comes to it.

While I do believe in defending those who can not defend themselves...it would be nice if more people learned that in order to survive a bit more, you need to adapt to the situation...
you're not american by any chance are you?
Grew up in Italy, so technically no.

Moved to US two years ago.
oh right. sorry I don't want to make this some sort of nationalistic, my country is better than yours bullshit. i thought it would go some way to explain why you think the way you do. even growing up in italy i think their view on this subject might be parallel with the us (talk about your generalisations) because the us has a very individualistic view of how things work; if good things happen to you you deserve it if bad things happen to you you deserve it. but this is going off topic.

to say that all of this boils down to complacency i think oversimplifies the whole situation. bullies target people because they are weaker than them, but it doesn't have to be physical weakness. bullies also target those who are mentally weaker than them e.g. those with autism. to say that all they have to do is rise above it does not only them but any victim of bullying a severe disservice.
 

Wilko316

New member
Jun 16, 2010
260
0
0
I don't think I was every properly bullied, just maybe picked on here and there but thenagen that was early high school and who doesn't succomb to that? Just adolescent play which I wasn't all that bothered by. One time I may have been 'bullied' was being repeatedly called 'James May' because apparently I look like him. But it's fine now, he doesn't do it anymore and he's part of the scum of society anyway. It didn't really affect me then apart from getting sick of it here and there but meh, life goes on.

I personally dislike the mainstream society because it's just not stuff I think explores anything, or atleast not anything I'm personally interested in. My Metal music explores darker subjects and poilitical and religious comments, my stoic philosophical viewpoints put life into context, my MMORPG's ... well they're just fun.

About the X-Men thing, I'm not sure, I'd probably do what I personally felt was right and not be completely tied to one side.

About nerds (me being one) thinking they're superior than people who bullied them because of some psychological need to put it into perspective, I think maybe that's true. But there's alot of evidence for me personally to consider myself better than that kid who called me 'James May' alot; I'm more intelligent, I'm better off socially, I'm much more handsome (XD) and I'm not hated by everyone else who I come into contact with outside of a few people.

Maybe that's me psychologically putting his behaviour into context, maybe I'm correct, but the more we dwell on the past, the further the present and the future slip away.
 

Jopoho

New member
Nov 17, 2009
125
0
0
Lazzi said:
DSQ said:
NinjaTigerXIII said:
Woh Bob, I'm sure I didn't just hear you make fun of Michael Jordan. That man went through so much hardship to get where he is today.
This is so true, just because he is in sports doesn't make his life any more or less important than bill gates.

And this is coming from someone who hates sports and decrys the lack of recognition that scientists are given.
I think hes talking about how bill gates was demonized for making billions of dollars for making something that has become an intergeral part of socity while Micheal jordan is made a hero for something that is in all reality just a frivolous past time.

Dont get me wrong, I like Micheal Jordan and Im a basketball fan (GO HEAT!) but I do recondinse that technology is far more important than 12 giants dribbling an orange ball around a wooden court.
Ten giants on the on the court, and only nine if Steve Nash happens to be playing.

I agree with what you're saying about Bill Gates, but I do think there is more to Jordan than just his skill. Lot's of athletes are great at their sports and may be as rich, but not necessarily as famous as Jordan or as well received as Jordan. Jordan worked incredibly hard to get to where he was. He didn't invent something integral to society, but he did reinforce the importance of perseverance, which is also important to society.
 

scarab7

New member
Jun 20, 2009
313
0
0
Great if I had superpowers I'd be a villain. Thanks a lot Bob, I'm evil, crap.
 

Javelk

New member
Nov 18, 2009
80
0
0
I would try to stay out of it, but I know there's no way that's going to happen no matter how hard I try. I do think I would side with the X-men, but I would have to inform them to keep their after school bs to them selves.
 

theedbot

New member
Nov 9, 2009
23
0
0
back on the bullying thing, I have three reasons why bullies do what they do from both being on the giving and receiving end. First it is easy, especially if people are unwilling or somehow unable to fight back. Second it is funny, you need very little to provoke people and from that point on the reaction from the victim starts saying some really despite stuff like how they will make you pay for what you have done and start saying some poorly worded insult. The third thing is the sense of power that it gives bullies, seeing someone stand there before you with a look of both terror and rage as you torment them, knowing that you have so much power over them is a feeling that is both exhilarating and terrifying.
 

TWEWER

New member
Feb 8, 2009
121
0
0
Intellectualism is just another form of elitism. I say that we should all attain happiness through simplicity.
 

timeadept

New member
Nov 23, 2009
413
0
0
MasochisticMuse said:
The most common reason boys get bullied is really quite simple; sexism.

Whereas women fought for and won the right to freedom from constrictive gender expectations, men are still very much trapped in "the man box", or the rules to being a man. (note that I'm not saying feminism has been "won", only that now a woman won't be criticized for say, wearing pants, taking a job as doctor, or anything else considered to be traditionally "male").

When you ask someone what positive attributes make a man "a man", they'll give you examples like "caring for their family, working hard, understanding the needs of others, being kind" etc. You'll realize that these are things we usually attribute to being a good person, and apply just as easily to women as men.

When you ask someone to truthfully tell you what defines "masculinity", they'll tell you something along the lines of "aggressiveness, dominance, competition, strength, power, heterosexuality" etc. Essentially, all fairly negative and violent attributes. The main thing to keep in mind is that masculinity is most importantly defined by being not femininity and not homosexuality.

By this definition, masculinity is something that must constantly be reaffirmed and put on display for others, whether it's proven by playing sports, fighting, having sex with numerous women, drinking, or pointing out and criticizing feminine qualities in others. Bullying, particularly the physical kind, is a display of dominance and therefore masculinity. The bully is reaffirming his dominance and masculinity, usually by picking a male victim who fails to meet a certain "manly" criteria.

What's most interesting about sexism against men is that it's enforced most strongly by other men. Rarely (though not "never") will a woman criticize a man for breaking gender roles, but if a man steps outside the masculine criteria, you can bet his circle of male friends will step in immediately to call him a "queer, pussy, fag or homo" (note that the most common terms men use to insult each other are based either in femaleness or homosexuality).

Anyway, the bottom line is that even though women have freed themselves from constrictive gender identities, "masculinity" is still considered highly more valuable than "femininity". That's why the little girl who likes robots and hates dresses is applauded, but the little boy who has an Easy Bake oven and doesn't like roughhousing with other boys makes his parents worry and is bullied on the playground.

People often overlook men's issues because males are given so much privilege in our society that it's assumed they have no issues to begin with. However, the way in which we define "masculinity" in our culture not only severely restricts men, but also encourages negative attitudes towards anything that is not included in the definition, like homosexuality and femininity.

Disclaimer: My message is not that being a man or being "manly" is evil. It is also not my opinion that everyone who gets bullied is inherently "unmanly". My intention is to make people think about how they define masculinity, and how they treat people who don't conform to that definition.
Women aren't free from their gender role. Yeah they've gotten a lot of freedom to move into traditionally male areas but Women and girls are still expected to be thin and attractive among other things. I mean this even more so than men. There is much more pressure on women to fit certain standards when it comes to obesity and attractiveness. Also have you seen what girls can do to each other? They can be flat out CRUEL, especially if they perceive the girl to be masculine in some way. Just like men hold other men to certain standards, women will hold other women to other different standards.

I just wanted to polish the other side of that coin if you know what i mean. You know, to clarify that women get bullied too for the same general reasons and that are not immune to it as you (probably inadvertently) implied.
 

bigboss0o0

New member
Feb 1, 2011
1
0
0
This line of thought is horrible and i mst say im suprised at Bob. If you had power you would use it for revenge is that really how you think? Because im pretty sure thats identical line of thought to what Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were thinking on april 20 1999.
 

Zig_the_hunter

New member
Aug 19, 2010
15
0
0
team magneto team magneto team magneto

I was only slightly bullied in school, but magneto isn't really evil he has the same goals as the x-men, he just doesn't want to do things the nice way.
 

Jammy Fingers

New member
Apr 7, 2010
21
0
0
I don't know where I'd be.
I think if for being different I was ostracised I would probably end up neutral to evil on a DnD character sheet (magneto being chaotic evil and charles xavier being good as opposed to lawful good which are the weird corporation in "heroes"). This would probably be accounted for by my belief that there are still things more worth fighting for than money and my understandably jaded view of the world.

Also as a child you aren't bullied because you are different its because when you are an adolescent you gain joyful emotion from the feeling of power. one of the greatest moments of your life is the empowering moment when you first leave home. Bullying is all about power.
the reason they pick on certain individuals is because they see that individual as a vulnerable individual. the kid who sits on his own is often a popular choice because he doesn't have much in the way of defence. no-one has ever seen a whole group of goths all bullied by one guy or the nerd's table interrupted by no less than the number of nerds present minus 1.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
Oh Bob you evil genius!
While I understand the super mutant counter bully sentiment I wouldn't want to fuel another Adolf in his madness, understanding is the key to our salvation, but people are still mainly animals... and well a dog hasto be hit on the nose until he really understands.

As for the "because you're different", well that just sums up all peoples hate toward others and our need to group up and find conflict (all who are not in our group shall be hated!... console fanboy 101)
But bullying really comes down to "because we can", noone will pick on someone with more power only on those with less, and picking on weaklings will both serve up conflict and empowerment.
 
Aug 11, 2009
14
0
0
i would probably be with Xavier first, then depending on which comic version I'm in, the nicer ones i would probably stay on Xaviers team, however the darker ones i probably would join Megneto.
 

ayvee

New member
Jan 29, 2010
107
0
0
I might be off on my X-men lore, but am I basically being asked to choose between siding with an elitist terrorist group or a peacekeeping organization? And I'm expected to pick the former?
 

Lazzi

New member
Apr 12, 2008
1,013
0
0
Jopoho said:
Lazzi said:
DSQ said:
NinjaTigerXIII said:
Woh Bob, I'm sure I didn't just hear you make fun of Michael Jordan. That man went through so much hardship to get where he is today.
This is so true, just because he is in sports doesn't make his life any more or less important than bill gates.

And this is coming from someone who hates sports and decrys the lack of recognition that scientists are given.
I think hes talking about how bill gates was demonized for making billions of dollars for making something that has become an intergeral part of socity while Micheal jordan is made a hero for something that is in all reality just a frivolous past time.

Dont get me wrong, I like Micheal Jordan and Im a basketball fan (GO HEAT!) but I do recondinse that technology is far more important than 12 giants dribbling an orange ball around a wooden court.
Ten giants on the on the court, and only nine if Steve Nash happens to be playing.

I agree with what you're saying about Bill Gates, but I do think there is more to Jordan than just his skill. Lot's of athletes are great at their sports and may be as rich, but not necessarily as famous as Jordan or as well received as Jordan. Jordan worked incredibly hard to get to where he was. He didn't invent something integral to society, but he did reinforce the importance of perseverance, which is also important to society.
I didnt mean to degrade Micheal Jordan or any of his achivements, I belive that perciverence is important. Personally I think that Bobs choice of subjects in the comparison was rather poor in retrospect (mind you those are the two most well know members of that group, so we have to give him that).

Lets break it down to minimulist terms.

Person (A) has made billions of dollars by creating technology that has helped advance socity and help millions derectly and is made by the media to apper evil.

Person (B) has made billions by playing a sport which has had no reall binficall impart of society and is made out by the media as a hero.

Assume that both of these people (whome have no history of which to speak of, they have simply popped into existance for the purpose of this thaught experiment)are of the same mildly pleasnt demenor its seems rather odd that (A) is demonized simply becuase he able to think of this that most people are unable to grasp.