The Big Picture: Not Okay

Recommended Videos

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Father Time said:
John Funk said:
Volf said:
flying_whimsy said:
This is probably the most pissed off I've ever heard movie bob sound; I don't blame him, either, as I've said the exact same thing on more than one occasion over the last few years. I remember calling some friends out on throwing the word rape around more casually than I was comfortable with and they looked at me like I grew a second head.

Seriously, nerd culture based sexism is something I would seriously like to see go away. Forever.
using the word rape to mean lose doesn't equate to sexism
No, but it does devalue the concept of rape as one of the most horrifying things a person can do to another human being, and certainly doesn't help deal with widespread rape culture.

Rape Culture 101. [http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2009/10/rape-culture-101.html] Educate yourself.
The theory of rape culture always seemed kind of sketchy to me. That author seriously thinks games with rape in them encourage a society where rape is not taken seriously? I'd love to see what evidence she has to support that but I'm guessing it's nothing.
It's not just games with rape in them, it's that it becomes a very tricky quagmire of linking violence, aggression, and (male) sexuality while simultaneously sexually objectifying women and trivializing rape. There's no ONE thing that gets done to support it, but... well, once you start to understand it and see it, there's no unseeing it.

Abandon4093 said:
It's still a completely null point. We don't condone violence against women, far from it. As a culture we're much more accepting of women being violent to men than vies-versa.

Culturally we are far more likely to condone sexual violence if the woman is the perpetrator. Just look up that bullshit that happened with 'the view' or some other garbage day time chat show. When they brought up the story about that guy having his penis cut off and 3/4 of the panel burst out into fits of laughter and saying her probably deserved it, because he was a guy. They were then forced to do an apology, if that's what you could call it. Can you imagine that with the roles reversed? If a chatshow with male panellists had laughed at a women having her genitalia mutilated. They'd have been fired and probably had legal action brought against them faster than you could blink. I'm not bringing that up to whine about how women get preferential treatment etc, but you can't bring up cultural opinions about sexual violence and then ignore things like double standards.

That isn't an isolated case either. Just look at that experiment.

Are you really going to say that we culturally support violence against women? Because that's just bullshit.
It's true that violence against women by men is considered more acceptable - even funny - by society at large. Is this problematic? Of course. But it's ALSO seated in the inequal status of women, by and large. Women are viewed as weaker and inferior, so ergo violence by them against men isn't something to be taken seriously by large swathes of the populace. They see it akin to a child being violent against an adult.

Yes, it's a problem. But women don't have the social and institutionalized power that men do. So while people not taking violence against men seriously is problematic, it's also problematic when one state (Kansas? Missouri? Around that area, I forget) stops prosecuting domestic violence cases entirely because it can't afford to do so. It shows where the priorities lie.

And on the harmless fetishisation side of things, females being dominant is ever more present in both pop-culture and the bedroom.
...which is, again, a male fantasy. Not that there's anything wrong with sexually aggressive or dominant women in fiction, but it almost always goes hand in hand with a "ingenue vs slut" narrative. How many of those women are the heroes, compared to a virgin "good girl"?

So no, I didn't read down to that part because frankly it's more of the same tripe that always get brought up in conversations like this.

"MOAAR WOMANZ GET WRAPED THERFOR EET MATTERS MUUR!"

Making up a concept such as rape culture and then focusing on it's effects on one gender/sex is so unbelievably hypocritical I can scarcely believe I'm having to point it out.

Women AND men are both the target of sexual violence and assault, to focus on one more than the other is tantamount to saying that one matters more than the other.

Not to mention I doubt the figures on the percentage of women that have been raped in comparison to the percentage of men that have been raped are even close to being accurate. What is it, like an estimated 1 in 6 women report rape or sexual abuse. I'd wager the ratio is even more alarming with men. Because there is an even greater social stigma attached to that, especially if you identify as a heterosexual male and happen to have been raped by another male.
Yes, there is absolutely a stigma against reporting rape if you are a man, and these statistics only cover REPORTED rape. It's almost certainly higher for women, and much higher for men.

But frankly, it does make sense to focus on rape and sexual violence against women more-so than men - not excluding them, but focusing on the women - because not only do men have more institutional power, but it IS more common.

Here's the thing, in blunt facts: A man is more likely to rape somebody than a woman. If we want to prevent somebody from raping somebody, that message needs to be targeted at men. And since men rape women more than they rape men, well.

Should sexual violence against men be ignored? Of course not. But a widespread culture of sexual violence against women (and, it might be added, the "feminization" of men who are sexually violated) lends itself to certain forms of pushback.

I'm pretty much going to put that 'rape culture' BS in the same category as Andrea Dworkins and her theory that all sex is rape because there's penetration.

--snip--

No no no.

You can't just bat that away.

Is saying "murder", "cripple" or any other word being used as a hyperbolic synonym for 'dominate', in the context of competition the same as saying "rape"?

If not, you'd better give me an actual reason. Not some quasi-feminist ramblings about our big bad culture being pro-raping women (because apparently raping men doesn't count) with a list of bias supposedly proving that.
I don't buy into Dworkin's ideas, but I sure as hell buy into the idea of a rape culture. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.

And here goes. I'd like you to read this, first: Why Rape Jokes Are Never Okay [http://www.menspeakup.org/why-rape-jokes-are-never-ok].

There is a reason that rape is considered very different from "murder" in this sense (and I'm going to just ignore the "cripple" bit, as A.) it's hardly used in the same context and B.) when it is used, it's used in a way that the word has been used for years; i.e. "his economy is crippled" in StarCraft. "Rape" as a synonym for "dominate", however, is a new development in language).

In 2006, there were 17,034 "murders and nonnegligent manslaughters" in the United States. In that same year, there were 92,455 "forcible rapes." This does not include other types of rape, like rape by duress - and as mentioned above, that number is likely to be MUCH higher given that this was just the number of REPORTED forcible rapes. There are some estimates that say that only 20% of rape cases are ever reported. While this may be a particularly highball estimate, we can both agree that this number is likely significantly higher, yes?

Right away, rape and sexual violence is a crime that affects far more people a year than murder. And from a consequence of that, you are more likely to know a rapist than you are to know a murderer (in fact, you probably do. And whoever they are, they sure don't seem like a rapist, because if there were an easy way to identify rapists we'd be doing it already).

Refer back to the article I linked. You read that, right? The vast majority of rapists think that *all men rape.* Now, obviously that's not true. And the idea horrifies most of us non-rapist guys, undoubtedly.

Which is why telling rape jokes, or trivializing rape as a synonym for "defeat in an electronic game" is problematic. Because it reinforces to a rapist viewing that "yeah, this is okay." And that makes it more likely that, y'know, he'll do it. The more trivial the concept of rape becomes, the easier it is for someone who's thought about it to go and do it.

And that's why "rape" is inherently different from "murder". Also, well, going back to the concept of a society that links sex with violence and aggression against women. There is no "murder culture," but there is a "rape culture."

Even if these two things weren't true, the fact that there are so many more people affected by rape than murder every year should be reason enough.

Volf said:
John Funk said:
Volf said:
flying_whimsy said:
This is probably the most pissed off I've ever heard movie bob sound; I don't blame him, either, as I've said the exact same thing on more than one occasion over the last few years. I remember calling some friends out on throwing the word rape around more casually than I was comfortable with and they looked at me like I grew a second head.

Seriously, nerd culture based sexism is something I would seriously like to see go away. Forever.
using the word rape to mean lose doesn't equate to sexism
No, but it does devalue the concept of rape as one of the most horrifying things a person can do to another human being, and certainly doesn't help deal with widespread rape culture.

Rape Culture 101. [http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2009/10/rape-culture-101.html] Educate yourself.
And when people are hungry and they say they are "starving", it also devalues a very terrible slow death that millions of people suffer from, and yet I don't hear people saying that that word isn't discouraged. So why focus so much on this word? Why not discourage the use of the word "starving"?
Father Time said:
John Funk said:
"What about teh menz?" isn't always the answer.
So you don't think people should bring up rape against males in a discussion about rape in general? Good to know.


John Funk said:
Abandon4093 said:
John Funk said:
Abandon4093 said:
Like any of that actually needed to be addressed.

1 asshole =/= even a small portion of people who play games. His opinion of gaming-culture, which is a nonsense phrase to begin with, means exactly the same. The only reason that douche got any attention is because he was on some shite TV show.

People like you, responding to this type of behaviour as if it's actually some sort of real issue and not a few lone nuts being retardly backwards are what give the stereotype of 'sexist gamers' credence. Because it gives the impression it's a serious enough issue for it to be addressed.

News flash......... it's not.

And BTW, 'rape' is not a sexist phrase. What is sexist is your assumption that that phrase is in someway, only demeaning to women. You didn't overtly state that, but I don't really see any reason for you to have brought it up if that wasn't your point.

"I'm raping you!" When used in the context of a competition is in no way sexually explicit. It simply means one side/person is dominating the other side/person. If you read any more into it than that, you've got hangups.
It is trivializing one of the most traumatic experiences a person can foist on another human being to a mere "LOLOL I'M WINNING." If you don't see any problem in that, then you're ignorant as hell.
I assume you mean the 'raping' part.

In that case when someone says "we're murdering you" or "I crippled your ass" (which are phrases I've heard just as much as 'raping' when playing fighting games, sports games and shooters against mates) we should reprimand them for being ignorant as hell because they trivialised murder and being crippled. Both things I'd argue are worse than rape.

It's not a trivialisation, it's got nothing to do with the actual act of rape. It just draws on the connotation of dominance that word evokes.

I really wish we didn't have to bubble wrap our words incase they bounce off the wrong person.
Again, refer to "Rape Culture 101."
Nothing in that article refers to how the use of rape in trash talk trivializes it.

How often have you heard "my parents are going to murder me because of my bad grades". Is murder trivialized? No. Far from it.

You can talk about how it makes people uncomfortable and is immature and you'd be right but the idea that it trivializes rape is debatable.
See my response above.
 

axlryder

victim of VR
Jul 29, 2011
1,862
0
0
Meh, was okay. I was hoping Bob would tackle the more interesting aspects of sexism and segregation, but he really just went on a PC rant defending everybody who isn't a white male from generalized politically incorrect remarks. Fine I guess, it's still an issue so there's obviously still a place for rants like this and I can't fault him for getting angry at things like blatant sexual harassment. Though, I don't think the whole issue is as simple or one-sided as Bob is making it out to be.

That said, while you can tell people it's wrong to, say, trivialize rape by using it as a colloquial term, I'd think attempting to actually stamp out such forms of "self-expression" (especially through enforcement) will likely result in a pretty severe backlash. If one feels their rights are being infringed upon, I'd think the backlash will be that much harder.
 

Valanthe

New member
Sep 24, 2009
654
0
0
Just wanna say Bob, I would watch your shows even if you never touched a controversial topic. That said, I don't think I've -ever- heard you get this worked up before, you sounded genuinely angry. I'm not blaming you either, as someome who views gaming as his lifestyle, seeing someone like this who makes the entire gaming community, not just himself or his tournament, look bad, absolutely infuriates me.
 

thiosk

New member
Sep 18, 2008
5,410
0
0
Heya bob, I agree with you here. But I did find this funny.



versus



And we're supposed to somehow believe this isn't proof positive that Capcom are not actually nazis? Oh they didn't know that drawing two S's as slanty Z's didn't mean like WE CAN HAS NAZI TIME NAOW? This here be proof. You won't find this on the mainstream liberal media, thats for sure.

You heard it here first.
 

Icehearted

New member
Jul 14, 2009
2,081
0
0
Father Time said:
Icehearted said:
Zachary Amaranth said:
Icehearted said:
...and yet not a word about misandry. Oh, that's right, it's only awful when it's happening to women. Way to throw more gas on the fire by stating the obvious as unevenly as possible, pretty much like anyone else lamenting the woes of oppressed women these days.

I don't disagree with you, Bob, but another "save the women, damn the men" speech changes what, exactly?
Did you enjoy knocking down that strawman? It seemed therapeutic.
With this video, and these persistent women in gaming discussions (and that panel with Susan Arendt and others), I don't see the straw man, I see persistent lambasting of anyone that isn't a woman or isn't a man that doesn't side with women on this issue as vehemently as possible. Preemptively suggesting that people of an opposing or even a possibly slightly dissimilar viewpoint will become ugly and hostile (I assume the images of angry mobs with pitchforks served as a visual demonstration to that "fact") doesn't exactly jibe with the notion that any disagreement with the points he'd chosen to make can be even a little rational either.
Conversations about this topic always start up flamewars, Bob's just commenting on that.

It does feel biased at first that it's only about sexism against women but this is a discussion about sexism within gaming. There's not a whole lot of sexism against men in gaming, but if you find some you're free to talk about it.
I realize that, and I'm really not here to fight.

As for sexism against men, there are far too many examples to list here, but I'll give you a favorite of mine, "Testikill". Google, it if you wish, and enjoy the hilarity of killing men via brutal sexual violence. Good luck finding the female equivalent, or for that matter, an achievement for shooting women to death in their vagina.
 

Razzigyrl

New member
Mar 22, 2011
57
0
0
Thank you, Bob.

I realize that forum rules generally require more than that to be considered a valid post, but really, that's all I'd like to say.

Thank you.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Father Time said:
I don't doubt that. It seems like she just takes anything problematic involving rape and labels it rape culture. For instance teens knowing how to rape is rape culture? It's not that complicated if you have an unconscious person. It certainly isn't a sign that our culture doesn't take rape seriously.
Problematic things involving rape ARE part of rape culture. Some to more extent than others. For example, teens knowing that you could use roofies, or whatever. I don't think that's a particularly SIGNIFICANT problem, but everything contributes a little bit.

What an awkward way or working in that men have institutional power. Not that that prevents them from having domineering controlling wives who are also abusive.
We're not talking about an individual man with an individual wife. I've dealt with this on a personal scale, myself. But that does not change my institutional power and male privilege, nor does it change the situation for the vast majority of men and women. Yes, domestic violence is horrible no matter who it's from/towards. Nobody's denying that.

They provide no links to any of the alleged studies about how rapists think all men rape, so since it's completely unsourced ...

--

Well I don't know how they got the 20% so no.
Can't find the "Rapists think all men rape" study, but an official UK government report [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics#cite_note-5] found that between 75%-95% of all rapes go unreported. In the US, from 2000-2005, it was 59%. Better, but not by much.

That seems way too simplistic. It's one thing to think it's trivial when you're just thinking about it. It's another to still think it's trivial when you're trying to do it and seeing first hand that it's hurting someone.

Also there's a reason why rape jokes are called dark humor. Most people who think they're funny acknowledge that they are sick jokes in a way that sex jokes aren't. And since they're called sick jokes well that kind of reinforces that rape is bad.
And yet you're still being asked to make light of it. You're asking a rape survivor to laugh at one of the most traumatic events in her life.

Rape jokes are not okay. Using 'rape' as a synonym for 'defeat' is not okay. Ever.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
Volf said:
John Funk said:
See my response above.
Your response doesn't answer my question
You asked:

"And when people are hungry and they say they are "starving", it also devalues a very terrible slow death that millions of people suffer from, and yet I don't hear people saying that that word isn't discouraged. So why focus so much on this word? Why not discourage the use of the word "starving"?"

A.) 'Starving' is the word of a terrible condition, but it is not one foisted upon somebody by another human being. 'Rape' is.

B.) In trivializing rape, we are indirectly making it easier for someone to rationalize or justify it to themselves.

C.) Part of it is, admittedly, location and relative class privilege. Not many people are starving here in the States or in the UK. Rape is a much bigger problem than starvation. Is it fair? Well, that depends - it's people discussing an issue that matters more personally to THEM, as it's one they're more likely to encounter.

And hell, in many countries where they're starving, the rape statistics are through the roof anyway.
 

Helmholtz Watson

New member
Nov 7, 2011
2,497
0
0
John Funk said:
A.) 'Starving' is the word of a terrible condition, but it is not one foisted upon somebody by another human being. 'Rape' is.
True, but that doesn't change the fact that using both terms so casually, trivializes both of them. So again, why not ask people to not use the word "starving"?

John Funk said:
B.) In trivializing rape, we are indirectly making it easier for someone to rationalize or justify it to themselves.
...what? How do you make that leap? Also does that mean that by trivializing the condition of starving, "we are indirectly making in easier for someone to rationalize or justify [the concept of starving people]"?

John Funk said:
C.) Part of it is, admittedly, location and relative class privilege. Not many people are starving here in the States or in the UK. Rape is a much bigger problem than starvation. .
So then would you not have a problem with people from countries where the criminal act of rape is low, to say that a recent exam "raped" them?