Zachary Amaranth said:
medv4380 said:
It doesn't make fun of "religion". It makes fun of Catholics. Which has been the tried and true tradition of the Protestant US for many generations even before the US was founded. That's really why electing Kennedy was such a big deal in US History. And for all the Catholic bashing it did a large portion of Religious Right Wing America could look past it because that's all it was. Catholic Bashing: An American Tradition Since December 1620
While Catholicism is the focus of the movie, I'm not sure how you walk away from Dogma without an indictment of organised religion as a whole. I mean, you can kind of argue that it panders to the mewling cop out of "I'm not religious, I'm spiritual," but it wasn't going to win many points with any religion or sect.
You might want to lookup actual Protestant Propaganda against the Catholic Church.
Taken out of the context Protestant Propaganda always looks like it's against "organized" religion. However, since Protestants are clearly groups of Organized Religions they clearly are not against "organizing", and are only taking a swipe at Catholics. No matter how much like hypocrisy it might seem.
The "sweet" Jesus was a direct swipe at Catholic Idolatry that Protestants always criticize them over. The giving away forgiveness to get people to show up was the main plot point of the movie was oddly similar to the selling of indulgences that, again, Protestants hated about the Catholic Church. Dogma symbolizes how silly Catholicism seems to Protestants if Catholicism were the "one true church".
Clearly what Walsfeo was claiming
walsfeo said:
Making fun of religion was a bit edgy back then.
Is clearly false. It's always be the status quo to mock the Catholic church in the way the Kevin Smith did.
As the Anti-Catholic Defamation League stated about the film when it came out
Donohue said:
That film critics like the New York Times reviewer, Janet Maslin, and Time magazine's Richard Corliss, thought it a gas means either that they will laugh at anything, or they can't resist giving high marks to any movie that insults Catholicism. The only way to find out for sure is for someone in Hollywood to make a stupid comedy that insults Protestants or Jews (preferably both), and then run it by the likes of Maslin and Corliss.
Mocking a religion that most Protestants hate isn't anti-religion and hasn't been taboo in this country EVER. It's, unfortunately, completely normal. Had Smith used Baptists, or any other recognized Protestant group it would have failed as a movie. Take Red State as evidence of that small little fact. Had he used Catholics instead of Republican Christian Fundamentalists, guaranteeing he alienated over half the potential audience, he probably would have succeed.
Which is sad that some people actually mistake clear bigotry of one specific group as "OK" just because it can be warped to a world view of hate of someone they can accept hating. The Atheist who love it as Anti-Religion are just as bigoted, and hateful, as the Protestants who love it as the Anti-Catholic Protestant Propaganda that it is.
The people who like it, think it's just tongue in cheek humor, and nothing more, don't see it as irreligious are kinda ok, but even they don't like a film like Sucker Punch at attempts to mock them in much the same way.