The Big Picture: Tropes vs. MovieBob

Recommended Videos

conflictofinterests

New member
Apr 6, 2010
1,098
0
0
THANK YOU MOVIE BOB. FUCK.
It blows my mind how often men will bring up that they are unrealistically portrayed in games too, and conveniently forget that their unrealistic portrayal was a power trip on their part, not some masturbation bait stuck in for someone else's benefit.
 

Catrixa

New member
May 21, 2011
209
0
0
Smilomaniac said:
Catrixa said:
Things I said.
A sober, respectful and thoughtful reply. If Feminist Frequency had this tone instead of the accusatory one, it'd be a lot less bashed by the mindless idiots out there, a thought heavily ignored by most it seems.

Kudos to you for explaining it far simpler and giving good reasons to why abundant sexualization might not be that appealing to a female audience.

What you just said might give artists and designers a reason and ideas to implement more choices for people, who want to customize their character and not look like a total bimbo, while giving those who do want that look, the same options.
The 150.000 would be far better spent on you, rather than the upcomming onesided "Tropes" series.
Thank you! To be perfectly honest, I spend an inordinate amount of time thinking about this sort of thing and, to be completely fair, am not the first to come to this conclusion (there was an article awhile back about it, can't remember where it is, though). It seems to me that the real issue everyone forgets is that it all comes down to choices: there aren't a ton of games to choose from with strong female protagonists/characters (this is usually not a huge deterrent for me, but I hear it come up a bunch), and there (sometimes--definitely only sometimes; I've seen some utterly insane customization in games before) aren't a ton of in-game choices for not looking silly.

As far as whether or not Feminist Frequency is worth $150,000: maybe if she included a whole ton of interviews with industry experts/members/analysts and actual solutions to the issue? I haven't watched any of her stuff, but I've heard she's pretty biased. I dunno, I'd love me a good $150,000, but I think it would be better spent on the same issue with the Extra Credits guys. They've got a lot of connections and really good ideas.

Besides, I'd just blow it on video games, comic books, Magic cards and maybe an art degree (seriously, $150,000 is a freaking bucket of money) so I can stop sucking at art xD.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
LazyAza said:
The thing most anti-feminism arguments always gloss over as far as I can tell isn't that women don't want big boobed male appealing media to exist and they don't want to take it away, all they want is more balance, more options, more diversity.
You're right, but there are quite a few faulty arguments on both sides.

The biggest thing these feminist arguments gloss over is that we live in a free-market society. If there's someone willing to buy the product then someone will make it. You can't just blame the supply-side of the industry, the demand side is equally culpable, if not more so. It may be the case that many of the developers are chauvinist meat-heads and are biased in what they create. But it only takes one break-away game that appeals to the female audience in order for producers to see there's money in it and then hire less meat-headed developers to capitalize on this fact. People are kidding themselves if they think the people heading up EA give a crap about promoting a male chauvinist agenda. All they care about is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

There is no point in people protesting and writing in letters that they want more games (or what-have-you) geared towards them if there isn't enough of a market for those games. The fact of the matter is that the greasy sex-obsessed teenage boys make up a significant amount of the market, which is why the industry panders to them. And I hate to say it, but the free-market is pretty much amoral. Blaming the economic system for a social problem isn't going to get you anywhere. Overall a (properly regulated and trust-free) capitalist system is a tremendous source of good. The real problem with America isn't capitalism (which is only an economic system): it's consumerism (which is a destructive value system).

(Well, that and our politicians are corrupt and thus the government does not regulate the system enough to prevent trusts from forming. But one could argue that the spread of consumerism has amplified this indirectly in that it has eroded the intelligence and values of the American public to the point that they are easily manipulated by the aforementioned corrupt politicians and their superpacs. But that's a story for another time.)

SLIGHTLY MORE OT:

I'm sick of hearing these tirades from people like Bob. It isn't because I disagree. Video games are CLEARLY sexist, and it isn't the same for men as it is for women.

I'm sick of hearing it because all it is is a bunch of whinny complaining that offers no tangible solution. These people like to make these videos because they're addicted to the feeling of righteous indignation and the implicit feeling of moral superiority that accompanies it. They don't really even care about a solution, all they want to do is complain so they can hear themselves speak. Their proposed answers are always something wishy-washy like "we need to keep spreading the word and enlighten people". In other words: "WE NEEDZ TO COMPLANEZ MORRRRRR!" Ugh.

While it may be true that people like Bob do not want to take away the sexist crap and just want more products geared towards women, I'm afraid that's exactly what these companies will perceive them as saying when most of what they do is complain about the sexist crap. They need to stop focusing on complaints and pointing out instances of what not to do, and start telling producers what they should be doing.

Here's an idea: perhaps effort would be better spent on getting out a positive message that it's okay for girls to play video games. Maybe then there will be enough of a female demographic to counteract the sexism. Many women don't play games because they perceive it as a male activity. Granted, the tremendous amount of sexist crap made to appeal to teenage boys doesn't help this, but you'll never be able to limit this crap; there's just too much of a demand for it. (Best of luck trying to get horny teenage boys to stop objectifying women, LOL!)

Instead of complaining about the sexist crap, I think feminist-inclined gamers would be better off if they petitioned theses companies for a game that appeals to women. When you start off by complaining about a company's products you'll immediately put the company on the defensive, which is not a very good way to get what you want. If enough people wrote in they might actually realize that there's more than just one demographic. I don't know what the percentages are, but if there really are enough women who take offense at this stuff and want more games geared towards them then companies will start making games for them when they come to realize this.

How about instead of making a video pointing out all of the sexist tropes in games, this woman sets up a website and invites all female gamers to send in what they want to see in games? Maybe this website can have a lively forum for female gamers to exchange ideas. Maybe they can even establish a Female Gamer Manifesto and send it out to developers and producers, challenging them to make a game that accomplishes the things they have laid out.

But no, people will just keep on complaining because it's easier.
 

ThrobbingEgo

New member
Nov 17, 2008
2,765
0
0
ReiverCorrupter said:
The biggest thing these feminist arguments gloss over is that we live in a free-market society.
Oh yeah. The Free Market never does anything wrong. Corporations always act in the best interests of their customers. What the public wants is always right.

(It's not like there has ever been public supported racism or genocide anywhere, ever.)

Ah, I needed a good laugh.

---

Also she can criticize limiting portrayals of women AND provide other outlets for change. Or not. It's her call. I liked her pitch and previous work enough to back her project. If you don't like it, well, that's another victory of the free market.
 

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
DrVornoff said:
Riobux said:
Edit: Add to that, the irony of feminism is they can be at times incredibly sexist but yet still taken seriously academically is revolting. Keep in mind, this is the same academic (that's the key word) area that would pretty much crucify you if you uttered a racist, homophobic or sexist-towards-female remark.
I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to discover that there are still ivory tower polemics in academia! This is the fifth monocle this week I've lost due to the sheer volume of such discomfiting revelations.
Indeed *adjusts new, plastic monocle*, quite.
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
Eri said:
I think the worst part of the whole Tropes thing is the fact she's gotten over 150,000$ and for what? To make what is basically youtube videos? That's absurd.

Take a look at this show, extra credits, yahtzee, etc... They make on average a 5 minute video a week and constantly put them out, she is making what amounts to 3 hours tops of videos and making way more than I'm sure anyone else gets paid, and for much less work too.
She only asked for $6000, but people still felt she deserved their money. Everyone who donated knew how much had already been given to her, but chose to donate anyway. Lord knows what she will do with all of it - I imagine she'll end up giving most away to charity or some such. It doesn't really matter though, does it?
 

ThrobbingEgo

New member
Nov 17, 2008
2,765
0
0
Tenmar: I could continue arguing with you but, I'd wind up CTRL+C CTRL+Ving my previous arguments too. If you didn't persuade me that media effects theory and hegemony criticism were the same thing the first time, you're not going to persuade me or anyone else who actually studied communications theory the thousandth time.

Keep it real.
 

Matt_LRR

Unequivocal Fan Favorite
Nov 30, 2009
1,260
0
0
PercyBoleyn said:
Maybe she should have considered a publisher then.
Or, considering she was trying to fund a small project to host on her own website, maybe she should have used a crowd-sourcing system like kist-OH WAIT.



PercyBoleyn said:
I'm sorry, I must've boarded the wrong plane. Since when did her pet project turn into a business?
Why are you so hung up on this "business" point. She is trying to create a project. Projects cost time and money to make. Projects are also sometimes profitable to the person who undertakes it.

SO WHAT?


PercyBoleyn said:
She was perfectly capable of doing that without crowd funding. Many people were actually. In fact, there are numerous video series on YouTube regarding a large number of subjects, all for free.
Maybe she could have - but so what? There are systems (like kickstarter) that exist for the sole purpose of allowing people to generate funding for projects they want to create. Apparently people were more than willing to pay her to make it. Why shouldn't she make use of that?


PercyBoleyn said:
She didn't seem to hit that little snag with her previous 33 videos and numerous posts on her blog.
Again: So what?


PercyBoleyn said:
Poor thing must've lost a fortune. Quick, setup a Kickstarter to pay her back for all the videos she's done for free until now. She might starve!
This isn't an argument against making money on it now. I did LoadingReadyRun for five years for free before we got picked up by The Escapist. Now I make money on it. If the Escapist hadn't picked us up, i'd still have done it for free, but given the option between doing it for free, and doing it for a paycheque, I'll take the paycheque.


PercyBoleyn said:
I do remember that model working a little bit differently. Firstly, it's a for profit venture. Secondly, the writer has to pay back the advance. Anita's series is not for profit and the donors are not likely to see a return on their investement because they didn't invest. It's a very different model and you can't exactly compare it to the relationship between publisher and writer.
No, you pretty much can. the difference is in the terms of the agreement, not the structure of it.



PercyBoleyn said:
You didn't watch her videos.
Actually I did. I'm not sure you actually know the difference between what might be cast as "radical feminist ideas" and the generally non-controversial ground covered by FF.

PercyBoleyn said:
She is wrong actually. Not on every level but she gets numerous things wrong.
Her feminist arguments aren't wrong, they sit pretty much in line with accepted feminist theory.


PercyBoleyn said:
The same way she's lived up until making her Kickstarter project. Your situation and her's are not comparable.
Bullshit they're not. I work a full tuime job because my work with LRR pays a little, but not enough to actually live off of. If I had a series idea, with sufficient interest and financial backing to support undertaking it, I'd drop my day job like a sack of rocks.


PercyBoleyn said:
Two years.
On top of four years undergraduate study.


PercyBoleyn said:
She entered into a contract with her donors. That money isn't hers to do however she wishes, it's still the donors. They paid her for a product and she's probably going to end up pocketing a part of that money, even though nowhere did she state she would use part of the funds for personal means.
She entered into a contract with her donors to produce a video series with a clearly identified set of deliverables. As long as those deliverables are delivered, she's not in breech.


PercyBoleyn said:
Okay, so we've gone from trying to justify her using the cash for personal gain to acknowledging that she's going to do so. That's a good thing.
"Gone from"? From minute one, I've contended that that money is hers, and can be used however she deems fit in the course of producing this video series.


PercyBoleyn said:
It's not.
Yeah it is.



PercyBoleyn said:
youtube video
That is neither "lying" nor is it in any way related to deception while generating funds for this project.

PercyBoleyn said:
Well, actually, yes she has. I'd find it quite dishonest if the money people thought would contribute towards a series of videos is instead pocketted by her, especially since she didn't make it clear that it would happen.
PEOPLE DON'T LIVE FOR FREE. COSTS OF LIVING ARE PART OF THE EXPENSE OF CONTENT PRODUCTION.


PercyBoleyn said:
No I don't think so she hasn't shown herself to be particularly knowledgeable on the subject of women in the media.
Except for, you know, the Master's degree she has in it. And the Published thesis she did on the topic. And the fact that she's spent yers working as a well respected writer, blogger and videographer on the subject.

Thank christ you are not grand arbiter of what qualifies as "knowlegable".


PercyBoleyn said:
I'm not the one who embarassed myself on camera by attempting to critique a female charater in a video game without knowing anything about the character or the video game. She digged her own grave, i'm just calling her on it.
There's one person who's dug themselves into an embarassing hole here, and it sure as hell isn't Ms. Sarkeersian.

-m

Edit: I've wasted far to many words on you at this point. Have a great night.
 

Kelgair

Regular Member
May 20, 2012
41
0
11
ThrobbingEgo said:
ReiverCorrupter said:
The biggest thing these feminist arguments gloss over is that we live in a free-market society.
Oh yeah. The Free Market never does anything wrong. Corporations always act in the best interests of their customers. What the public wants is always right.

(It's not like there has ever been public supported racism or genocide anywhere, ever.)

Ah, I needed a good laugh.

---

Also she can criticize limiting portrayals of women AND provide other outlets for change. Or not. It's her call. I liked her pitch and previous work enough to back her project. If you don't like it, well, that's another victory of the free market.
You've taken what he was saying and twisted it into a bizarre absolute... that didn't even have anything to do with what he was talking about... just, wow.
 

Schadrach

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 20, 2010
2,324
475
88
Country
US
DrVornoff said:
LazyAza said:
The thing most anti-feminism arguments always gloss over as far as I can tell isn't that women don't want big boobed male appealing media to exist and they don't want to take it away, all they want is more balance, more options, more diversity.
Behold! Someone who has actually made an effort to understand feminist theory. It's not hard, guys. You have Google.
...except that there have certainly been feminist driven "kill it with fire"-style campaigns in the past. So it's not "feminists don't want to actively destroy media that offends their ideological sensibilities" it's "feminists don't want to actively destroy quite all media that offends their ideological sensibilities." Because there have certainly been examples where "feminists attempt to actively destroy media that offends their ideological sensibilities", such as that non-explicit tentacle hentai themed card matching game or "online feminism vs Penny Arcade."

If there's one piece of feminist theory I can't understand, it's rape culture. It just seems to use underpants gnome logic, and for the life of me I can't see why it doesn't apply to any other topic, why if rape culture supposedly is a thing that "murder culture" or "auto theft culture" aren't, by following precisely the same train of thought (with presumably the same mysterious "2. ???").

Rape Culture

1. Someone makes a joke about rape, a joke that references rape, or refers to rape in literally any non-feminist approved manner.
2. ???
3. Rape is considered normal and trivial, and therefore more people rape.

if that makes sense, then why doesn't

Murder Culture

1. Someone makes a joke about killing, or a game in which countless human characters will be killed directly by the player, especially if normal civilian people.
2. ???
3. Murder is considered normal and trivial, and therefore more people murder.

Also, it amazes me that she posted the video, prewarned about the trolling, then went and poked the wasps' nest at 4chan (spam flooded her video there), and then acted as if it were an unprovoked attack on her because of her feminist opinions. There aren't a lot of things that you can poke 4chan with that don't cause exactly this, and blaming the "gaming community" as a whole for it is ridiculous.
 

Corran006

New member
May 20, 2009
61
0
0
Great video I agree with everything Movie Bob said. He's right this just is not a big of an issue for men as it is woman.
 

Darknacht

New member
May 13, 2009
849
0
0
Tenmar said:
ThrobbingEgo said:
Tenmar said:
Okay, so you've never watched any of her videos. Cool.
Way to go in ignoring my entire post and actually yes, I have watched ALL of her videos. To be honestly I actually got sick watching them cause of the massive amounts of leaps of logic she takes and holds her own opinion over the core of the issue or factors that would actually cause say said men who grope women to actually grope women.

Last I checked making posts like this is quite reportable.

EDIT:Hell watching her Suckerpunch movie review didn't really offer me anything more than the director was pandering to male fantasy. Yet if I watched Moviebob's review I actually find out the director was the same man involved in Watchman and 300. So is this "parasite" (using HER word there) really part of the "male driven backlash against women"?(once again her words)

Also note how just NEGATIVE she is. I'm sorry but being an actual critic means actually criticizing the actual content of the work and understanding the background and portfolio of the person involved. You get NONE of that with her video and learn NOTHING as well.

Not only does she not really say anything of value in her videos, but the only entertaining thing about them is just how dense she is. Sucker Punch was a satire and after she makes a review proving that she did not get it someone posted a comment informing her that it was a satire and her response was that it failed to be a satire because she did not get it and then she blocked all further comments about it being a satire. The fact it went over her head proves that she does not pay any attention to what she is criticizing because at one point the a character yells "Stop!" and the movie stops while the character explains that this is a satire. Also look at her criticism of old Christmas songs, a song from 1951 has gender stereotyped toy suggestions, no shit it was 1951.
There are lots of problems with how society and media portray females but she has no idea what they are.
 

Blind Sight

New member
May 16, 2010
1,658
0
0
ReiverCorrupter said:
The biggest thing these feminist arguments gloss over is that we live in a free-market society.
We don't really live in a 'free market' society though. A market society, yes, but not really a 'free market'. I'm not holding the free market up as utopia, but there is a distinction.

That being said, there's plenty of other criticisms that can be thrown at Sarkeesian's work, particularly her poor research and contextualization skills.