I remember hearing about this study, where they took 100 people and gave them all a survey to do, rating their beliefs from 1 to 5 (strongly disagree to strongly agree). When those were turned in, most of the answers were 2-4, with very few 1s and 5s. Then they put them into small groups and had them complete the same survey. When they turned those in, all the answers were either a 1 or a 5, nothing between.
Same thing is happening with CoD. Most of the people who call it terrible and say the series should die have been influenced by the internet, and their opinion was amplified. Same thing with some of the fanboys.
If you're one of the people who hates it that much, I seriously doubt that was your opinion when you played MW2.
Plus, there's the whole bandwagon effect. It's popular to hate CoD.
Now don't think they're terrible games, the campaigns are a good few hours of ridiculousness, and the multiplayer is fast, mindless fun. 4 was a great game and had some of the best multiplayer of the generation that far, but then it started focusing too much on the multiplayer.
As for them being "overrated", game critics know about all the hate, but they have to stay objective. 4 got a 94 on Metacritic from 70 positive reviews. There's is no way more than 10-20 of those were extremely biased. MW2 got 100 positive reviews, although I do have to admit it was running on a shitload of hype. World at War had 76 positive and 8 negative reviews, and BlOps got 83 positive and 6 negative.
EDIT: That's all on 360, by the way.
So consistently getting 70-100 positive reviews does not make it overrated. It makes it good.
Same thing is happening with CoD. Most of the people who call it terrible and say the series should die have been influenced by the internet, and their opinion was amplified. Same thing with some of the fanboys.
If you're one of the people who hates it that much, I seriously doubt that was your opinion when you played MW2.
Plus, there's the whole bandwagon effect. It's popular to hate CoD.
Now don't think they're terrible games, the campaigns are a good few hours of ridiculousness, and the multiplayer is fast, mindless fun. 4 was a great game and had some of the best multiplayer of the generation that far, but then it started focusing too much on the multiplayer.
As for them being "overrated", game critics know about all the hate, but they have to stay objective. 4 got a 94 on Metacritic from 70 positive reviews. There's is no way more than 10-20 of those were extremely biased. MW2 got 100 positive reviews, although I do have to admit it was running on a shitload of hype. World at War had 76 positive and 8 negative reviews, and BlOps got 83 positive and 6 negative.
EDIT: That's all on 360, by the way.
So consistently getting 70-100 positive reviews does not make it overrated. It makes it good.