I'll have a go trying and put up a defence of games not getting stupider.
What is being compared here are western RPGs. There are only so many really top flight western CRPG houses to account for so I can compare a couple of them to check for signs of dumbing down.
1. Black Isle/Troika
Troika have gone through the final terminal dumbing down in that they have closed down due to not being able to get the hit that all game devs need to stay open. It can be argued that Fallout was their most intelligent game as it was their most popular. If anything though Arcanum was a more complicated and abstract work with better writing. Temple of Elemental Evil had the best combat gameplay. Their final game VTM: Bloodlines featured some of their best dialogue, plot and characterisation. Troika games had 99 problems but dumbing down wasn't one of them. Many people from Troika are now spread out in the industry from Obsidian to Blizzard.
Verdict: Never dumbed down and may now be working to make titles like Diablo 3 and Alpha Protocol smarter.
2. Bioware
Hired by Interplay/Black Isle as an outsourced company to apply their RTS game engine to the task of making a D&D RPG, Bioware created Baldur's Gate and became a western RPG shop. They were mainly noted for popularising RTS "real time with pause" combat and introducing a JPRG Final Fantasy 7 type party system and narrative to the American RPG. Baldur's Gate 1 was quite a boring poorly balanced game that mainly appealed to hardcore D&D fans but they improved a lot by BG2. They disappointed some of their fans by creating Neverwinter Nights which had less side content and dialog than BG2 but added a whole lot of other valuable features.
The dumbing down accusations really come in when they start making games for the XBox. Really, these games mostly have the same sort of content as their previous games and they do experiment with other types of gameplay.
Verdict: Not dumbed down. Bioware never made the smartest games despite outdoing themselves by putting an incredible amount of content in BG2. Their biggest crime is in reusing the same characters and quests too much while using gameplay that does not appeal to their established fans.
SilentHunter7 said:
Valentine82 said:
Maybe this follows a trend in evolution.
I'd say the trend is that there's
always dumb games. Games are only perceived as dumbing down, because no one wants to remember all the shit games that came out way back then. E.T., anyone? How about the CDi Zelda games? Do I even need to mention Superman 64? And who can forget Shaq Fu?
I'd take any mainstream game today over those piles of feces.
I believe that this thread is trying to compare the best games western RPGs of today with the best of yesterday. I don't think you are comparing Superman 64 to Fallout 3 and Mass Effect. The worst, poorest selling, games are an irrelevant distraction. Like arguments about games getting stupider due to people inheriting the stupid gene changing game design and content noticeably in 10 years.