Shepard Book says there's a special hell reserved for people who talk in the theater.Zombie Badger said:Killing people for no reason, of course. Second worst would be talking in the cinema.
In Japan, and it's probably Platinum Lay now.Mimsofthedawg said:Personally, I think raping the youngest girl and then making the mom watch is worse. But then, I guess which is worse is irrelevant cause they're both dispicable.lwm3398 said:Killing a family, raping the mom/oldest girl, and making the youngest watch. This, if anything, deserves the death penalty.
Genocide.
Didn't they make a game about this? Rape lay or something?
Yes. I think that it should carry the death penalty. Along with murder. Now, you said that murder is something we're used to. With all the genocides and pillages, witch burnings, we have to be used to it. But we can't be. You may not have cared about that young girl thought to be a witch being burned, but someone hundreds of years ago did. You may not care about all those people who died between all the wars: But someone did. No one will ever not care about a loved one's death. Thus, someone will always be fighting for the punishment of murderers.Random argument man said:rape is a serious crime.
I don't think this is so bad. Hell, in Black and White you can set people on fire! Children included. You can do anything you want to the people, crush them, throw them, drop them down mountains, destroy their houses, anything you can think of. However, it's just a game. Killing in a game doesn't matter. Now, killing children, or adults for that matter, is bad. In a game? Who cares. I could care less about little computer people.Mimsofthedawg said:Making a game with children where you can kill EVERYTHING accept for the children - yet the physics still apply to them. Answer me this, what's worse, killing a child in cold blood, or detonating a nuke under them, sending them hurling 50 feet in the air outside of the safety of their compound, where now they must fend for themselve in the cold, hard, unforgiving, Yao Guai infested wastes. I'd elect murder!
I'm obviously talking about unnecessary killing. I understand that sometimes you must kill somebody to save other people's lives.hoopyfrood said:This is complete nonsense. There is nothing wrong with killing to defend yourself or someone else. If you find yourself in a situation where you either kill a criminal or watch him kill someone else, you can't just go "welp, I won't kill him because that would be wrong," since you will, through your inaction, cause another person to die anyway. Except instead of killing the criminal, you kill an innocent person. Fantastic.Internet Kraken said:To kill somebody. There is not greater crime than taking away someone's life.
If I said rape would be punished by a death sentence, I would accept murder as a punishment tool. I never said I didn't care for all those people who died. (It's a wonderful thing you used the word "may").lwm3398 said:Yes. I think that it should carry the death penalty. Along with murder. Now, you said that murder is something we're used to. With all the genocides and pillages, witch burnings, we have to be used to it. But we can't be. You may not have cared about that young girl thought to be a witch being burned, but someone hundreds of years ago did. You may not care about all those people who died between all the wars: But someone did. No one will ever not care about a loved one's death. Thus, someone will always be fighting for the punishment of murderers.Random argument man said:rape is a serious crime.
I believe you misunderstood, what I meant by loved ones fighting, I meant that they would be fighting for the murderers death. And I think execution is a punishment that is for the worst of crimes, as in rape and murder. Those two only. But before I go further, let me explain what I meant.Random argument man said:If I said rape would be punished by a death sentence, I would accept murder as a punishment tool. I never said I didn't care for all those people who died. (It's a wonderful thing you used the word "may").lwm3398 said:Yes. I think that it should carry the death penalty. Along with murder. Now, you said that murder is something we're used to. With all the genocides and pillages, witch burnings, we have to be used to it. But we can't be. You may not have cared about that young girl thought to be a witch being burned, but someone hundreds of years ago did. You may not care about all those people who died between all the wars: But someone did. No one will ever not care about a loved one's death. Thus, someone will always be fighting for the punishment of murderers.Random argument man said:rape is a serious crime.
Sure, we can't accept murder at 100% as a society. However, a lot of justice systems thinks it's a good thing.
It becomes less and less acceptable in many countries. That's a good thing. However, some countries still uses execution as a mean of punishment. Like you said, loved ones will not accept murder as an answer. They'll probably reject the punishment.
Bottom Line: Murder is accepted by the punishers. Murder is not accepted by the punished. Well, If you mixed my logic with yours, it pretty much gives this conclusion.
Sorry about that! I tend to be a little confusing sometimes. No, I don't support the death penalty. I would like to beleive that humanity can evolve from this old way of thinking.lwm3398 said:A big fucking snip