Yeah, that's about the gist of it. Basicaly it's a load of people who were baptised when they were babies, and they say that because it was done without their wishes, and they disagree with it, and with the process of (basically) forcing a religion upon children who don't have a choice in the matter.Anton P. Nym said:If I understood the issue correctly (and it's far from clear that i have) it's that these guys want their names stricken from the records as members of the churches at which they were baptised. It's not a "ew, icky, get this holy ghost stuff offa me" thing but a "please remove my name from yourcallinglist" thing.
In the Church's defence, they did say they would amend the register, but not fully take someone's name off of it as it is a historical document; seems pretty reasonable to me.
I'm a non-baptised atheist and I would have to say I'd be pissed if someone baptised me in my sleep or something, and I would want it undone. It's not a case of worshipping atheism it's my way of saying I don't agree with the church or anything it does.