Yes there is:Fbuh said:There is no reasone why Creationism nor evolution can be taught simulataneously.
Because it's science class, not mythology.
Yes there is:Fbuh said:There is no reasone why Creationism nor evolution can be taught simulataneously.
I could get behind that. It really is irritating having to explain that.Zetion said:Can we at-least choose a different word? Most people can't seem to grasp what a theory is in a scientific context.Avatar Roku said:While I do believe in Evolution and not at all in Creationism, I think you are absolutely right. People really do make a false dichotomy between the two. Theoretically speaking, there's no reason that God couldn't have put all the observed scientific processes in motion. Some religious people I've seen act like science will put an end to religion, but they shouldn't even be in competition! One is the how, the other is the why.TFielding said:I'm a Crevolutionist. I believe that God likes dominoes and set up the entire universe to play through this. So, you can't really put Creationism at odds with Evolution. I think the problem is that people do put it as Evolution vs. Creationism.See my above post (#33). Theories do not become Laws.Zetion said:I think we should make it a law so all the creationists can either shut the fuck up or make better, and possibly more hilarious, arguments.Deschamps said:Belief has no place in matters of science. If something can be demonstrated to be true, then you either accept it as truth, or you are a fool.Dann661 said:However, I do not think everyone should be forced to believe in evolution, if people don't want to, why make them?
I think some problems stem from calling evolution a theory. To people who don't understand it, it gives the impression that there's still a good chance it could be wrong. While there are missing links here and there, evolution has a pretty sound case.
It'll be swell.
I need to find this game...it reminds me of Pokemon only it has actual Dinosaurs!Dimitriov said:Everything I know about evolution I learned from this game:
![]()
This is how mammals superseded the reptiles!
![]()
Educational stuff![]()
So your belief is that Evolution is obviously the "intelligent" side.kouriichi said:Let me wrap this whole thing up in burritos. (thats right, im gunna wrap it like a burrito, with burritos.)
Sheep are Stupid.
Sheep are part of a flock. ((Unless theyre black sheep. Then its a Murder of Sheep))
The sheep will listen to whatever the dogs bark loudest. This is learned from an early age, because of the sheep doesnt listen, they get bit.
The dogs like to keep order, and control the flock ((or murder)) of sheep. So they bark loudly.
Now if you didnt get that analogy, let me explain it.
People are stupid.
People are part of religions. ((Unless theyre black sheep. Then its Atheism))
The people will listen to whatever their leaders/parents/priests ideas are. This is learned from an early age, because of the person doesnt listen, they get punished.
The leaders/parents/priests like to keep order, and control the people. So they force their ideas.
Roughly 50% of Americans dont believe in evolution.
Roughly 76% of Americans identify themselves as christian.
Christians are told from an early age, "God made man".
Because they are "brainwashed" (for lack of a better term) to believe what is RIGHT and WRONG, they never read in depth "theories" like Evolution.
Yes, this means many Christians are able to see past their "brainwashing" (again, for lack of a better term), but it also means many are blind, and dont WANT to see past it.
See how it all fits together? Most people who dont believe in evolution, are Christians. Anyone else is well.... an idiot. (Not in the insulting way. I mean "uneducated". And not in a bad way)
Because the large majority of people were told from childhood, "God is always right, never question him, he made the world and everyone on it", they dont believe in evolution.
Im not saying religion is bad. But there is a pretty large correlation between Religion, and the halt of scientific progress.
Please note: I am not saying anyone else has to believe this. This is just my belief. This is MY take on the situation and reason behind evolution being such a misinterpreted subject. If i offended you, sorry. It was not my intention.
I really don't mean to get into a huge discussion about this (unless you want to take this to a PM), but how is the bible proof? It's basically the same as saying your friend told you: anecdotal evidence that holds no water.Delsana said:Well the bible says that on a particular day He created man and than woman out of man.
There's really nothing to interpret out of that.
So... creationism.
Alrighty then.
---
Outside of that... when you can find the missing mitochondria eve then we will chat about EVOLUTION, but until then I'm not giving it a thought.
One reason really. People don't like change. They like the status quo, and don't like to be told that something they've believed for their entire life is wrong. Combined with the fact that Creationism has been around for thousands of years, it's no wonder really. People are ignorant, and people don't like leaving their comfort zone. The media and various politicians don't help because they love to pander people.Flac00 said:I will start off by saying I am no scientist. However, I have noticed that almost everywhere (including here on the Escapist) many people do not understand evolution. This not just simple missteps like accidentally involving use and disuse into your arguments, but major misinterpretations. But this is not the problem, simple misunderstanding and misinterpretations are not somehow horrible offenses. However this has lead to a problem.
These misinterpretations have now lead to a whole culture of people who not only refuse to believe in evolution, but also use their misinterpretations to fuel their arguments. An example of this run amok by ignorants is "Darwinism" (which is an extremely annoying name as Darwin had nothing to do with the theory), which was really just and excuse to "prove" racism. A modern example is half the population of the United States (or less since I have not checked recent polls). That's right, around 50% of the population of the United States does not believe in evolution, and that is sad. Especially since the scientific theory has undergone so much criticism and a constant wave of evidence, that it has become almost completely infallible. And yet people still live ignorant of it as they have been misinformed about evolution.
This all comes down to a single point. Why and how is this happening? Is it because our media seems to commonly ignore facts? Is it because people jump onto bandwagons just to get away from the "norm" of evolution? Is it because our public schools have failed to teach adequate science in the classroom? Is it because of the rise of Creationism and Intelligent design (which are the same exact thing) has been corrupting our science classes and media? I would just like to hear other people's opinions on this.
Because Evolution is not a belief. It is something with actual evidence behind it. So much so that it has become a Scientific Theory, which basically means that it is damn near proven (confusing terminology, I admit).enzilewulf said:![]()
"That's right, around 50% of the population of the United States does not believe in evolution, and that is sad"
Who put you on such a high horse? You know what? Your saying its sad that people don't believe in what you do, and that is sad. Seriously most people don't give a shit about Human evolution so deal with it. Why do people who strongly believe in Evolution have to be such dick heads? Sorry we can't all be like you.
Anecdotal, hearsay evidence. I have no doubt that these people truly are intelligent, but that does not prove your point.Delsana said:So your belief is that Evolution is obviously the "intelligent" side.kouriichi said:snipped for space
Interesting, though I know numerous intelligent Christians that are far more capable than either of us and they wholeheartedly explain, and defend Creationism.
I don't think you quite go far enough here. I don't think creationism/I.D. works as philosophy any more than it works as science. I mean, philosophy is about logic and reason just like science, it simply lacks any hard data to base its findings on. With the question of evolution vs. I.D. there IS hard data, and it favours evolution. Exactly like questions of chemistry and physics, this is something to be resolved by scientists, not philosophers or anyone else.Flac00 said:I don't think it should be forced onto people, however I do have a problem with Intelligent Design (and Creationism as they are the same). My problem is not with their existence but they idea that they are an acceptable scientific alternative to evolution. THEY ARE NOT. They are an acceptable alternative to evolution from a philosophical point of view, but not a scientific point of view. They are not science, thus they are not scientific theory. The reason they are not science is because they do not offer the main reason for the existence of science, evidence. All that exists for Intelligent Design is instead attempts to disprove Evolution, and no proof for the idea of ID itself.Dann661 said:I am a Catholic, but I still know that evolution exists, and I agree that it is appalling that most people don't don't know about it. However, I do not think everyone should be forced to believe in evolution, if people don't want to, why make them? Intelligent design is still a possible theory, as is the theory of evolution, I think God guided evolution but, I'm not going to go around and try and make people teach this in schools everywhere.
No, evolution isnt so much the "intelligent" side, as it is the "knowledgeable" side.Delsana said:So your belief is that Evolution is obviously the "intelligent" side.kouriichi said:Let me wrap this whole thing up in burritos. (thats right, im gunna wrap it like a burrito, with burritos.)
Sheep are Stupid.
Sheep are part of a flock. ((Unless theyre black sheep. Then its a Murder of Sheep))
The sheep will listen to whatever the dogs bark loudest. This is learned from an early age, because of the sheep doesnt listen, they get bit.
The dogs like to keep order, and control the flock ((or murder)) of sheep. So they bark loudly.
Now if you didnt get that analogy, let me explain it.
People are stupid.
People are part of religions. ((Unless theyre black sheep. Then its Atheism))
The people will listen to whatever their leaders/parents/priests ideas are. This is learned from an early age, because of the person doesnt listen, they get punished.
The leaders/parents/priests like to keep order, and control the people. So they force their ideas.
Roughly 50% of Americans dont believe in evolution.
Roughly 76% of Americans identify themselves as christian.
Christians are told from an early age, "God made man".
Because they are "brainwashed" (for lack of a better term) to believe what is RIGHT and WRONG, they never read in depth "theories" like Evolution.
Yes, this means many Christians are able to see past their "brainwashing" (again, for lack of a better term), but it also means many are blind, and dont WANT to see past it.
See how it all fits together? Most people who dont believe in evolution, are Christians. Anyone else is well.... an idiot. (Not in the insulting way. I mean "uneducated". And not in a bad way)
Because the large majority of people were told from childhood, "God is always right, never question him, he made the world and everyone on it", they dont believe in evolution.
Im not saying religion is bad. But there is a pretty large correlation between Religion, and the halt of scientific progress.
Please note: I am not saying anyone else has to believe this. This is just my belief. This is MY take on the situation and reason behind evolution being such a misinterpreted subject. If i offended you, sorry. It was not my intention.
Interesting, though I know numerous intelligent Christians that are far more capable than either of us and they wholeheartedly explain, and defend Creationism.
Further nitpick on your nitpick: if it can't be tested or observed, it isn't even a hypothesis. Maybe 'assertion' or 'idea' is closer to the mark. I usually prefer 'thinly veiled religious extremism' to describe ID.Cpu46 said:Just a nitpick: It is the Hypothesis of Intelligent design. It is not yet accepted as a theory and honestly probably never will be, its just that it is impossible to test it using the scientific method.Dann661 said:I am a Catholic, but I still know that evolution exists, and I agree that it is appalling that most people don't don't know about it. However, I do not think everyone should be forced to believe in evolution, if people don't want to, why make them? Intelligent design is still a possible theory, as is the theory of evolution, I think God guided evolution but, I'm not going to go around and try and make people teach this in schools everywhere.
I agree that people should not be forced to believe in evolution, however I believe that it should still be in the classroom like most theories are and I do not believe that the hypothesis of Intelligent design should be taught as a counter to Evolution because we have no successfully tested or peer reviewed alternative to Evolution.
Just because a majority of the world believes in it does not mean it gets to circumvent the entire scientific method and go straight to theory.[footnote]venting some frustration I have on this general topic. Vitriol not aimed at anyone in particular[/footnote]
So do you think that God created the entire universe within a matter of days, including all life, or do you hold a more intelligent design belief with God creating the universe but evolution doing most of the "work"?kouriichi said:No, evolution isnt so much the "intelligent" side, as it is the "knowledgeable" side.Delsana said:So your belief is that Evolution is obviously the "intelligent" side.kouriichi said:Let me wrap this whole thing up in burritos. (thats right, im gunna wrap it like a burrito, with burritos.)
Sheep are Stupid.
Sheep are part of a flock. ((Unless theyre black sheep. Then its a Murder of Sheep))
The sheep will listen to whatever the dogs bark loudest. This is learned from an early age, because of the sheep doesnt listen, they get bit.
The dogs like to keep order, and control the flock ((or murder)) of sheep. So they bark loudly.
Now if you didnt get that analogy, let me explain it.
People are stupid.
People are part of religions. ((Unless theyre black sheep. Then its Atheism))
The people will listen to whatever their leaders/parents/priests ideas are. This is learned from an early age, because of the person doesnt listen, they get punished.
The leaders/parents/priests like to keep order, and control the people. So they force their ideas.
Roughly 50% of Americans dont believe in evolution.
Roughly 76% of Americans identify themselves as christian.
Christians are told from an early age, "God made man".
Because they are "brainwashed" (for lack of a better term) to believe what is RIGHT and WRONG, they never read in depth "theories" like Evolution.
Yes, this means many Christians are able to see past their "brainwashing" (again, for lack of a better term), but it also means many are blind, and dont WANT to see past it.
See how it all fits together? Most people who dont believe in evolution, are Christians. Anyone else is well.... an idiot. (Not in the insulting way. I mean "uneducated". And not in a bad way)
Because the large majority of people were told from childhood, "God is always right, never question him, he made the world and everyone on it", they dont believe in evolution.
Im not saying religion is bad. But there is a pretty large correlation between Religion, and the halt of scientific progress.
Please note: I am not saying anyone else has to believe this. This is just my belief. This is MY take on the situation and reason behind evolution being such a misinterpreted subject. If i offended you, sorry. It was not my intention.
Interesting, though I know numerous intelligent Christians that are far more capable than either of us and they wholeheartedly explain, and defend Creationism.
((I know people who you would call "intelligent", but they cant even change a flat tire))
And personally, i believe in creationism. But the thing is, Evolution is a fact. Why do you think the common cold is such a problem? Because its constantly evolving. Its always changing its form c. We can never cure it, because of its rapid evolution.
Or the experiment of increasing the lifespan of a fly. http://livelonger.hubpages.com/hub/Longevity_and_Genetics
Evolution is one of the few things we can actively PROVE. xD
That's why you teach evolution in the science classroom and creationism in the RS classroom. Creationism isn't a science and evolution isn't a belief; theory =! belief, some people seem adamant that the opposite is true. Both ideas should be taught because they're both key ideas in their respective fields and the idea that one should not be taught over the other is rather foolish, regardless of the validity of either.thenumberthirteen said:Not when one idea stands clearly over the others. It is in the halls of academia that hypothesis and evidence are debated, and not in the schoolroom. There is little time given to the teaching of Science as it is. The "teach the controversy" argument is an appeal to peoples' sense of democracy and fair play, but it doesn't really apply here. The same argument could be made for the teaching of Phrenology as science, or Geocentricism.