First, I would have beaten your assailants unconcious with a tire iron. I don't idly sit while violence occurs. I also don't approve of bullying nor assault.Jewrean said:You have no sense of justice. By your logic, if you saw a child being raped or a man being killed on the street, you would do nothing.SaneAmongInsane said:Uh why did you stop? Did you really expect these dick heads to care that they almost killed you? Did you expect any out come aside from getting strangled?
Sure sure, fuck the police and all that just... wow man, wow.
You've missed the point entirely, I don't care if this issue gets chased up. All I want is a common courtesy call explaining why it won't be investigated... and when you say "real crimes", define it? Every crime is a "real crime"... I know how the system works quite well, I have numerous mates who are cops and they are constantly complaining about the amount of paperwork and people they have to let down to tackle the 'bigger' issues. The point, therefore, is that the system doesn't work if 'small' crimes go ignored entirely.senordesol said:Hard truth: If the cops didn't give a shit within minutes of it happening, they're certainly not going to care 5 months later. They've got real crimes to deal with.
In-fact most of you are missing the point. It isn't about the crime itself... it's the fact that no one has bothered to speak to me about this! A simple phone call... nothing. Not even an email. Asking for 15 seconds of someone's day to send an email makes me a whinging douche-bag does it? I'm the bad guy here? Please...
How low has our society fallen to assume the person who challenges the foolish behaviour of others deserves to be ridiculed? I guess we should all just turn our heads away from crime and just be walked all over by thugs... because that makes more sense... clearly... cowards.
However.
*You* have utterly and completely missed the Reality. The police have many, many crimes to investigate. Many. Your report is likely one amongst thousands.
Police Point of View:
"Random guy got angry for a vehicle driving slow. He yelled at them, there was a physical altercation *which ended quickly* and no lasting damage was done. He has reported this to the Police, and an investigation will ensue."
You realize that on the scale of Crime, what happened to you happens to thousands of pub patrons every night in every country on Earth which has drinking establishments. They're called 'bar fights' and usually they have worse injuries than you suffered.
So the Police probably have about 5,000 Bar Fight reports to go through before your case.
In comparison to your case, the police have:
Assaults where persons are maimed or killed or disfigured
Thefts of thousands of dollars
Murders
Arson
...I could go on.
Furthermore, those same Police go to the home of the persons you reported. What do they do?
Lie.
Or worse, tell the Truth- that some *crazy guy tried to pass them, breaking the speed limit, and almost got into a head-on collision*.
After which he threatened to kill them (your word against theirs) and then they 'might have shaken him' in the Loud Argument that followed.
Yes, you have witnesses. So do they (themselves). The Police are weighing whether they can get a conviction on any kind of charge, and how much it will cost the Taxpayers to do so.
The Prosecutor (I don't know the Australian Legal System) then has to decide whether or not they can reasonably do anything in court.
Generally (and I speak from experience) the Police end up basically telling those three yobbos that *this time* they're getting off, but they're on Record and anything else out of them will result in them getting the Boot.
That's the Reality. And they're unlikely to tell the Public this because, surprise, the Public thinks that the Police should believe *them* without question and immediately arrest the guilty. If the Police were to tell someone 'look we can't get a conviction, they lied out their arse and it's your word against theirs', a lot of people then explode and blame the Police anyway.
In addition, have you considered the following?
You are by self-admission guilty of endangering the lives of others, by almost getting into a head-on collision because YOU 'had to pass' someone driving slowly.
No matter how irritated you were, the car in front of you posed no danger whatsoever. In the eyes of the Law, you were in no way justified in almost getting into a head-on collision. You could easily have driven behind the other vehicle and gone about your day none the worse for it. *You* chose to *speed* to get around the other vehicle, and have admitted you almost caused a head-on collision.
Therefore, whilst you are condemning the Police for not *talking to you about an ongoing case* you should be thankful you weren't cited for *your* actions.
End result: I don't agree with the actions of the other driver. He was a rank ass. However, you also need to face the reality of the situation, and realize that if you expect swift justice, you should also consider the reality of what *you* were guilty of, and whether you'd be as pleased if the police also busted *you*.