The popularity of Twilight and the disturbing implications herein

Recommended Videos

Noamuth

New member
May 16, 2008
1,137
0
0
Aries_Split post=18.71967.743276 said:
There is a clan of Vampries in Tamriel that have the ability to dissolve into water.
For some reason, that doesn't hurt my brain.

Just.. Why. Why the sparkling? Does the author want to be mocked?
 

Aries_Split

New member
May 12, 2008
2,097
0
0
Noamuth post=18.71967.743280 said:
Aries_Split post=18.71967.743276 said:
There is a clan of Vampries in Tamriel that have the ability to dissolve into water.
For some reason, that doesn't hurt my brain.

Just.. Why. Why the sparkling? Does the author want to be mocked?
Probably because Vampires in the Elder Scrolls series have decent explanation and reasoning behind them.


And they don't sparkle in sunlight...


WHY?
 

ThePlasmatizer

New member
Sep 2, 2008
1,261
0
0
Xaryn Mar post=18.71967.743275 said:
ThePlasmatizer post=18.71967.743246 said:
Fire Daemon post=18.71967.743229 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743208 said:
Nibbles post=18.71967.743204 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743190 said:
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743189 said:
In sunlight they sparkle.. -snip- Sunlight doesn't kill them.
.. Wha..

.. Oh God, my brain.
The author even admitted to not knowing vampire lore.
*facepalm*

Okay, there's trying to be original, then there's I want people to not take this seriously. What the shit was the author thinking?
You have no idea how hard it is trying to explain to people that Vampires can't cross running water or go into a house un-invited! GAH!!!
Vampire's in folklore are deceased people that are seen walking around again.

What you're referring to is Bram Stoker's depiction of vampires. He didn't create the idea of vampires so other authors are free to create their own vampire lore.
Well, actually there are several different legends about vampires from Central Europe and what the vampires could do differed a lot. But the rules with running water and entering are actuelly present in many of them (and they predates Bram Stoker).
As far as I'm aware the walking dead is the main idea of vampires in folklore, I'm sure the ideas of running water and entering houses came later.
 

Reaperman Wompa

New member
Aug 6, 2008
2,564
0
0
Noamuth post=18.71967.743208 said:
Nibbles post=18.71967.743204 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743190 said:
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743189 said:
In sunlight they sparkle.. -snip- Sunlight doesn't kill them.
.. Wha..

.. Oh God, my brain.
The author even admitted to not knowing vampire lore.
*facepalm*

Okay, there's trying to be original, then there's I want people to not take this seriously. What the shit was the author thinking?
Assumptions...
 

Noamuth

New member
May 16, 2008
1,137
0
0
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743344 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743208 said:
Nibbles post=18.71967.743204 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743190 said:
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743189 said:
In sunlight they sparkle.. -snip- Sunlight doesn't kill them.
.. Wha..

.. Oh God, my brain.
The author even admitted to not knowing vampire lore.
*facepalm*

Okay, there's trying to be original, then there's I want people to not take this seriously. What the shit was the author thinking?
Assumptions...
Lack of explanations...
 

firestorm713

New member
Sep 20, 2008
1
0
0
Coming from a rare *guy* who likes the series, i'll give it this: As a vampire story, it's unique. Meyer didn't fall into the trap of trying to use all the vampire lore that, say, the vampire-the masquerade games use (yes, those games were awesome, but you know of some books, movies and games that failed at it), but just some simple things *everyone* knows about vampires(like being immortal). Then she made up her own stuff. It's not Hellsing, and it definitely shouldn't be as much of a fad as it is (HP was worthy of that, not this) but I think if you can make it past the first book, it gets quite interesting.
 

Reaperman Wompa

New member
Aug 6, 2008
2,564
0
0
Noamuth post=18.71967.743346 said:
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743344 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743208 said:
Nibbles post=18.71967.743204 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743190 said:
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743189 said:
In sunlight they sparkle.. -snip- Sunlight doesn't kill them.
.. Wha..

.. Oh God, my brain.
The author even admitted to not knowing vampire lore.
*facepalm*

Okay, there's trying to be original, then there's I want people to not take this seriously. What the shit was the author thinking?
Assumptions...
Lack of explanations...
I was saying the author wasn't thinking, that's why I bolded "Thinking".
 

kelnadine

New member
May 18, 2008
72
0
0
ButtonedDownParadox post=18.71967.743100 said:
kelnadine post=18.71967.743060 said:
Razzle Bathbone post=18.71967.743029 said:
Dude, they patiently suffer through it when you drool over whoever the latest OMGHOT videogame blow-up doll is. I've never read Twilight, and I can't imagine it's all that good, but I seriously doubt the Twilight dream-boys can be any more vacuous and irritating than your typical videogame dream-girl.
Thank you. I was thinking it, and you said it.
Oh well how polite of you. To respond to my understanding with assuming I, "drool over the latest videogame blow-up doll". How about you make an actual defense of the Twilight series as I actually want to know what the deal is with this phenomena. I mean am I off-base by saying these characters are petty and illogical? Did I miss something? Is it damaging to aspire to the dysfunctional relationship Bella and Edward have like some fan boy/girls do?

As you may have noticed I haven't judged you like you have judged me and that's because I actually want to hear the other side of the issue.
Sorry, I left for a while so I'm responding to this late. I didn't mean you in particular when I said that. In the same way guys get mad at girls for wanting a guy as perfect as Edward Cullen, girls have to deal with guys wanting perfect girls. I was thinking about that, somebody made a post about it, so I responded. Honestly, it wasn't personal. I know that it's far from all guys who are like that.
 

Noamuth

New member
May 16, 2008
1,137
0
0
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743353 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743346 said:
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743344 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743208 said:
Nibbles post=18.71967.743204 said:
Noamuth post=18.71967.743190 said:
Reaperman Wompa post=18.71967.743189 said:
In sunlight they sparkle.. -snip- Sunlight doesn't kill them.
.. Wha..

.. Oh God, my brain.
The author even admitted to not knowing vampire lore.
*facepalm*

Okay, there's trying to be original, then there's I want people to not take this seriously. What the shit was the author thinking?
Assumptions...
Lack of explanations...
I was saying the author wasn't thinking, that's why I bolded "Thinking".
Ah, my apologies.

Author not thinking, me not reading. Bloody hell.
 

Jaythulhu

New member
Jun 19, 2008
1,745
0
0
I tried to read the first book, but my word, I haven't read such rubbish since I tried anne rice and robert jordan.
 

Rooster Cogburn

New member
May 24, 2008
1,637
0
0
Nibbles post=18.71967.743166 said:
I read Twilight last year. This year I read Dracula. Oh gee, which do you think I enjoyed more? :D
I would always have assumed Dracula (we are talking Bram Stoker right?). I would have assumed that people who liked this kind of thing were simply uninitiated. I assure you it is not self-evident that Twilight is more enjoyable.

Jaythulhu post=18.71967.743370 said:
robert jordan.
Woah, that strikes a chord. My friends were all crazy about the Wheel of Time for awhile. I would hate to admit how many books I read before I gouged my eyes out with a hot iron.
 

Chiasm

New member
Aug 27, 2008
462
0
0
ButtonedDownParadox post=18.71967.742942 said:
*Sigh* On a scale of one to ten how much am I overreacting? (Or if you actually think I have something going here feel free to rant)
Honestly, I'll just say this I think some girls are just born to like vampires, By that I mean I have several friends who are insane and love Ann Rice's books and also that other series were the girl is some detective who speaks to the dead. I am not quite sure why vampires are even so popular in any format. Though from what I have read in the thread the reason why so many would like it is, One the vampire is a rebel in society and the tough guy who is a rebel and your father would hate, Two the girl is popular and gets the main male interest and gets to date a hot guy.

I mean it's the same reason why some guys love Conan books and comic books where the guy is super strong and gets a ton of hot women,But instead it's the girl who everyone likes and she gets the coolest guy in school to like her.I mean women and men have both fallen for the stupid fantasy/sci-fi romance heroic books forever. I mean look at star wars it was just basically a story of a geeky guy who becomes strong and then gets the girl(almost). Also look at how many women like Han Solo as the rugged cool guy as well from the films or Angel from Buffy series.


P.S Everyone knows the best man that has ever lived was Nietzsche,But trying to find someone like Nietzsche to come for you is sadly not possible,Also Angels > Vampires.
 

Rooster Cogburn

New member
May 24, 2008
1,637
0
0
Chiasm post=18.71967.743379 said:
Nietzsche
Sorry for the aside, but I found Nietzsche a startling disappointment. I don't get the big deal with the guy. Maybe I missed something important?
 

Copter400

New member
Sep 14, 2007
1,813
0
0
A guy on Explosm did a negative review of Twilight. It was well-written and quite witty at points. For this, he was given everything from bad feedback to death threats. http://forums.explosm.net/showthread.php?t=21130

Also, Noamuth, can you give me the name of that webcomic?
 

Chiasm

New member
Aug 27, 2008
462
0
0
Rooster Cogburn post=18.71967.743386 said:
Chiasm post=18.71967.743379 said:
Nietzsche
Sorry for the aside, but I found Nietzsche a startling disappointment. I don't get the big deal with the guy. Maybe I missed something important?
It's not a big deal to most people, He is a either love him or hate him kind of guy with most hating him. For one he was the first to examine society from the outside of it. He also is the first mentor for the common person with problems. More so in how he thought it was the experience you have in life that is the reason for living. So if you are born blind or deaf you are blessed because you can see a world noone else gets to in there life rather then many who think you should be pitied. He is a big advocate of knowledge and the spreading of knowledge as well. I mean Nietzsche to me all comes down to "Amor Fati."

So I think you will find most Nietzsche fans as the people who value knowledge and spreading knowledge as the ultimate goal,Also it is a common mindset that you shouldn't curse your hardships in life but be glad you got to experience what ever pains and joys fate has given you.
 

Noamuth

New member
May 16, 2008
1,137
0
0
Copter400 post=18.71967.743389 said:
Also, Noamuth, can you give me the name of that webcomic?
Head Trip [http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/]. Not all of it is that amusing, though. But there is one more Twilight-related one [http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8716/20080915pd3.jpg].
 

psyniac_123

New member
Sep 10, 2008
47
0
0
Copter400 post=18.71967.743389 said:
A guy on Explosm did a negative review of Twilight. It was well-written and quite witty at points. For this, he was given everything from bad feedback to death threats. http://forums.explosm.net/showthread.php?t=21130

Also, Noamuth, can you give me the name of that webcomic?
http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/

It's awesome :)

Also - I avoided reading it at first, because not only is it a vampire story (and as far as I can tell we're oversaturated with THAT, or at least the people I know are all obsessed with it), it's a vampire LOVE story.

But I did read it, and I didn't find it that awful. I mean YES, it was stupid in some points (shiny vampires) and Bella was an absolute 'tard, but I still enjoyed it for some reason... and I don't know WHY.
 

Rooster Cogburn

New member
May 24, 2008
1,637
0
0
Chiasm post=18.71967.743395 said:
So I think you will find most Nietzsche fans as the people who value knowledge and spreading knowledge as the ultimate goal,Also it is a common mindset that you shouldn't curse your hardships in life but be glad you got to experience what ever pains and joys fate has given you.
Actually, that's very helpful. I think I missed the forest for all the trees when I read Ecce Homo and others.
 

Reaperman Wompa

New member
Aug 6, 2008
2,564
0
0
Copter400 post=18.71967.743389 said:
A guy on Explosm did a negative review of Twilight. It was well-written and quite witty at points. For this, he was given everything from bad feedback to death threats. http://forums.explosm.net/showthread.php?t=21130

Also, Noamuth, can you give me the name of that webcomic?
"Don't insult Edward. We're gonna get married one day, and he loves me!!!!"

We seriously need to do something before literature permanently becomes like this.

God I hate that series, not the worst I've ever read but for fucks sake it's not "the best book evarrrr" or whatever the hell else these deluded little retards typed, Christ I preferred it when books were nerdy things to be avoided, then at least what you read was written by someone both committed and capable, not saying Stephanie Meyer is terrible at what she does, just that she really needs to stop lowering the bar. God I can see the future now, nothing but books equally lacking in any realistic merit and spy novels.

The funny truth is that all the girls who read that crap probably read nothing else, I'm guessing because they don't understand/like anything without the absolute degradation of literature presented in the Twilight series.
 

Chiasm

New member
Aug 27, 2008
462
0
0
Also I think some think this book is something other then a fad, I mean remember Harry Potter that was a simple and stupid book and tons love it. Every generation loves the fantasy easy to read fluff books as it were it will soon pass I am sure. I remember still when people thought Stephen King was a serious writer too.


Rooster Cogburn post=18.71967.743404 said:
Actually, that's very helpful. I think I missed the forest for all the trees when I read Ecce Homo and others.
I would suggest The Gay Science,Thus spoke Zarathustra as some of his main works. Ecce Homo was I think his rationalizing of his own life to himself. Also Nietzsche's own growing insanity makes it hard to clearly make a good read of his works,As some have said he does not even count as a philosopher I have heard in classes due to his style.