You're right. Let's go ask what those definitions are.Deviate said:Disagreement is perfectly fine. Dismissing the emotional depth, sincerity and weight of the submissive's dedication when submitting to a dominant by calling it "roleplay" even after having been educated on it is very much offensive. That there are people who do "roleplay" BDSM or D/s in the bedroom is a certainty and I addressed it. That does not, in any shape way or form, excuse the offense of dismissing real BDSM and D/s as mere pretense and roleplay.Geo Da Sponge said:Way to make an appeal to authority there. Because as we all know, BDSM isn't at all based on personal tastes and desires, and presenting your tastes as more 'legitimate' than others isn't smug at all.Deviate said:I very much doubt you are in any kind of position to judge what is and isn't an insult on that matter. Two decades worth of experience in the field does allow me to make judgments on wildly inaccurate claims pertaining to said field. Especially when she had been asked repeatedly to cease insulting those who actually do engage in D/s and BDSM.Geo Da Sponge said:Snip.
Of course, this is yet more example of how only the convenient bits are spoken of and the inconvenient bits are ignored and desperately attempted to be buried under a flurry of posts.
Well are you going to highlight the inconvenient bits? I'll admit that I only browsed the thread, but all of her posts seemed pretty... Well, empty. That's not exactly a compliment, but I couldn't find any 'insults' from her that weren't based entirely on you disagreeing with how she interpreted something.
And no, BDSM is not based on personal tastes and desires alone. The definitions are old and they're firm. That posers and hobby amateurs start using the terms to describe themselves does not make their actions hold any kind of water when compared to the real thing.
Yes, I'm certainly smug and arrogant. I earned that, by learning the subject in very intimate detail, over time and through hard lessons.
From Wikipedia (I know, perfect source right?):
"BDSM is a preference and sometimes form of personal relationship centering around activities that are erotic but may not be sexual, and which may include the consensual use of restraint, intense sensory stimulation, and fantasy power role play."
Or Urban Dictionary (Another perfect source, of course. And I'm using the second definion given, but only because the first just shows what the acronym stands for):
"A physical, psychological and usually sexual power-role-play with consensual participants."
Annnnd Google:
"BDSM is a type of roleplay or lifestyle choice between two or more individuals who use their experiences of pain and power to create sexual tension, pleasure, and release."
Those are literally the first three defintions I can find that go beyond just saying what the initials stand for. Your definition that doesn't include roleplaying doesn't seem very firm to me now.
Now I'm not saying that what you do is roleplay, because I can see that would be rude. Not rude enough to deserve what you said to Boudica about it, but whatever. But I think it's just as rude to start saying that what other people do isn't 'real' BDSM just because it's not what you like.
Umm... Sure. I should warn you that I don't post much. You see...Devoneaux said:Can...Can I follow you from thread to thread? You have a way of remaining civil throughout a debate. I like that.
I don't usually post on the Escapist. But when I do, I get involved in a really messed up and thread derailing argument.