Not entirely true for everyone.
Myself for example, I still have Doom on my PC and play it regularly since the day I got it, about 15 years ago. To be precise I have Jdoom, Zdoom and Skulltag which are essentially an updated Doom engine with support for modern video cards and resolutions, mouse look and higher resolution textures, the game itself is still the same. Fan base is still strong and devoted and there is a lot of very good user made content.
If I had to make a choice and pick the game I would be playing for the rest of my life, I would pick that over any modern FPS without a second thought.
Furburt said:
wouldyoukindly99 said:
I think this type of behavior is classified as "Fanboyism".
Actually, coming from someone who played Bioshock first and
then System Shock 2, SS2 is the better game. Bioshock has a way better plot and setting, but SS2 has much better gameplay and is a lot more deep.
I'd love to see SS2 remade with the Bioshock engine though.
I've played SS, SS2 and Bioshcok in the proper chronological order, and if asked I would rate SS2 as the best of the three and Bioshock being the worst.
This is how I see it:
- SS was the first and original, when I first played it, to me it was a revelation.
- SS2 was the proper sequel with little more accent put on action.
- Bioshock, even though not directly related to SS series could be considered as the third game. The story is different but all the concepts are the same with SS games same goes for gameplay elements. The accent is put on visuals and action, to the extent of making in game currency, vending machines and mini games perceived as a needless distraction and sometimes an annoyance.
In short, I prefer SS2 because it has a perfect inner balance of all its elements.