i usually play stuff on the PC, but i occasionally go back to Wii
[small]but only because Nintendo owns my soul.[/small]
[small]but only because Nintendo owns my soul.[/small]
Actually no. It's is an abreviation of "It is". If you think I'm wrong, look it up and apologise.Generic_Dave said:Nope. I hadn't even considered playing it. It just never occurred to me...and that is kind of my point. I didn't stop and go "I could play the Wii, but I don't want to", or as you put it I "don't want to play it because you want to fit with the "in crowd"". I just found the realisation that it was there all along and I never even thought of playing it confounding.Durxom said:So basically you are saying, that you are refusing to play a legimately viable console, and to play some legimately fun games like Zelda, and Umbrella Chronicles, but you don't want to play it because you want to fit with the "in crowd" and bash the Wii....ya, you are probably alone
Yes I do realise that it is "it's" uselessness, I just didn't grammar check my headline!Queen Michael said:I haven't felt any inclination to play the family Wii for months.
Oh, and it's "its uselessness", not "its uselessness."
Oh and the irony that you got it wrong yourself correcting me mean no more Grammar Nazi-ing for you!
Wait...I'm too hungover for this? So I was right originally? Am I apologising? I was wrong somewhere anyway...my brain hurts.brainless_fps_player said:[Actually no. It's is an abreviation of "It is". If you think I'm wrong, look it up and apologise.
I did the same thing when my Wii killed itself. When I got it back I had a 360 to play on and I just don't fancy playing the Wii. Maybe if I played it with a few friends then I'd get more use out of it, but it's just not for anything else but party play.The Procrastinated End said:Well I stopped playing my Wii because I got my 360 and decided to use that and my computer for gaming. I guess I don't apply since I have something else.
No, it's not. It's wrong with the apostrophe in. With "it's" the apostrophe is only used in the shortening of "it is" and not to imply ownership. Since your title falls under the latter category, "its" would be the correct choice.Generic_Dave said:Nope. I hadn't even considered playing it. It just never occurred to me...and that is kind of my point. I didn't stop and go "I could play the Wii, but I don't want to", or as you put it I "don't want to play it because you want to fit with the "in crowd"". I just found the realisation that it was there all along and I never even thought of playing it confounding.Durxom said:So basically you are saying, that you are refusing to play a legimately viable console, and to play some legimately fun games like Zelda, and Umbrella Chronicles, but you don't want to play it because you want to fit with the "in crowd" and bash the Wii....ya, you are probably alone
Yes I do realise that it is "it's" uselessness, I just didn't grammar check my headline!Queen Michael said:I haven't felt any inclination to play the family Wii for months.
Oh, and it's "its uselessness", not "its uselessness."
Oh and the irony that you got it wrong yourself correcting me mean no more Grammar Nazi-ing for you!
Classic Controller Pro bro. Works on a crap load of games.Palademon said:If the wii had a proper controller, I'd play mine more. But, I barely use it and very occasionally will there be a game I buy on it. The last one was Monster Hunter Tri.
Agreed that it should have done that to begin with, but I doubt anyone here has more than two peripherals for the damn thing.Woodsey said:I had a Wii for 6 months, played it for 2. Sold it when I realised the games out at that time were basically all it was ever going to get, and I was mostly right.
It may be the cheapest console, but it's over-priced and you still get suckered into buying a million controller add-ons; one of which makes the remote do what it should have done to begin with.