The X1 has lost Microsoft 400 million

Recommended Videos

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Savagezion said:
However, overall the PC is basically mandatory in the home. For the middle class, the largest demographic, avoiding learning basic computer skills is just choosing to be ignorant. Choosing to be ignorant doesn't make the PC no longer a viable alternative. That's like saying Playstation is already a monopoly because I am not interested in Nintendo (platformers) and Xbox (shooters) game libraries. That's just selective vision.
.
I don't know....If anything I think the rise of tabelts and such have taken out the need for computer knoweldge
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Ultratwinkie said:
Actually AAA gaming is on its way out. Even Ubisoft admitted that they can't afford to keep spending 50 million on a basic AAA that has no guarantee of it selling.
.
Ubisoft? who has the seccond biggest cashcow of all? why are thease games so expensive and where is the money going?

while I'm all in favor of substance over style...it does make me wonder if it will affect the single player game...
 

Rad Party God

Party like it's 2010!
Feb 23, 2010
3,560
0
0
"...The good experiences I enjoyed with my 360", heh, good joke.

Honestly I'm not surprised, they've changed their focus and statements on their consoles like I change my underwear, re-focusing the Xbone as a "gaming console" (!) might be the right first step, but I'd sure as hell wouldn't trust them anymore if they decide to turn things as much once more.

But in all fairness, the Xbone's generation has just begun, I wouldn't judge a console's success in less than a year of it's performance.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Ultratwinkie said:
Now that indies are growing since AAA is deflating, we will eventually get our middle games back. It will take a while, but it will happen.
I supose we'll see....as I said I wouldn't be surprised to see more F2P and Tianfall in the future...

....anyway I may not know anything about game development but I don't see why you can't get a decent game without having to spend that much

not blockbuster per se but not artsy pixel graphics eather
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Vault101 said:
Zhukov said:
Although I suppose such an event could have unforeseen consequences. For example, it might adversely affect the PC, since Xbox games tend to get released on PC as a matter of course. Possibly? Eh, I dunno, I'm neither an economist nor even an industry watcher.
which Xbox games would that be? because while I wasn't "around" at the time I do belive there was some bullshit surrounding Halo 3 and Vista....

....well I guess theres Ryse..*snrrrk*
Well, there was the Mass Effect series (although that did eventually come out on PS3), Fable, Kingdoms of Amulahblahblah, and...

Um, and...

State of Decay?

Huh.

Okay, granted, it's hardly the most impressive list.

Regardless, my point was that Sony and Nintendo tend to hang on a bit tighter to their exclusives than Microsoft does, so turning the console market into a two horse race between Sony and Nintendo might result in fewer cross-platform releases making it to PC.

Like I said though, it's just speculation on my part, and fairly ignorant speculation at that.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Zhukov said:
Well, there was the Mass Effect series (although that did eventually come out on PS3), Fable, Kingdoms of Amulahblahblah, and...
.
in regards to mass effect I supose but then that was always on PC....
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Vault101 said:
Zhukov said:
Well, there was the Mass Effect series (although that did eventually come out on PS3), Fable, Kingdoms of Amulahblahblah, and...
.
in regards to mass effect I supose but then that was always on PC....
Um... yeah, that's part of the point that I'm clumsily trying to make here.

Despite being designed primarily for Xbox, it still got released on PC. This happens more commonly (I think) with Xbox games than PS/Nintendo games.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
...I'm sure that's different, somehow. Because ponies.
Consoles are closed propriatary systems that all must be identical.
Pcs can differ vastly from build to build and is more of what the user wants/are willing to buy rather than dictated by manufacturer.

No ponies involved.

Verlander said:
Perhaps my initial post wasn't clear, it was badly worded. The department is making sales, and so that loss really isn't a problem.[/quote]
I can see your point now, but i didnt get that angle from your initial post. Yes, microsoft always made its profit by holding free services hostage (like multiplayer) and making profit to cover the losses elsewhere. however the profit needs to be high enough to cover said losses, and history of Xbox platform so far shows that it has not been so. The initial investment hasnt been paid since the beginning of the Xbox. And its worth noting that there is no way Xbox Done is going to sell as well as 360. 360 sold well because it had no competition - Wii was full of shovelware and "Did its own thing", PS3 launched a year later and its launch was a disaster, so for a long time 360 was the only game in town for these consolites. When PS3 actually started competing we saw it catch up in sale numbers and even beat it at the end.

This time both PS4 and WiiU are much stronger competitors to One.

kilenem said:
lets not bring politics in this please. Although I think Israel has something to do with the creation the first Kinect
If i remmeber correctly the lab that deisgned kinect sensors and makes them is located in Israel.

BaronVH said:
It is not in anybody's interest for any of these three to fail unless all you care about is Candy Crush. Imagine one movie studio. If you enjoy movies, that would be a horrible thing to happen. Look at how far the music industry has sunk. All of these people who feel like they were betrayed by this or that decision, just lighten up and go play a good game.
It is in fact everyone that loves games interest that bad companies fair and good companies replace them. and since, as you say, it is the largest industry out there, it sure as hell going to fill the power vacuum and quick. Also funny how you imply Candy Crush being the only alternative to Microsoft.

Its GOOD that music industry suffers. it is run by horrible people that does not deserve to make the millions they do. It needs a hard reset. Just look at all the content ID claims of police sirens being "a copyrighted song" and basically stealing ad revenue. Not that gaming is any better - Nintendo did the same.



fix-the-spade said:
Mobile GPUs caught up with some aspects of consoles last year, they still rely on internal batteries and playing a 'real' video game on a touch screen is still horrible and will remain horrible until controller add-ons for tablets become standardised in their layout.
Mobile GPUs, such as Tegra K1 outperform console GPUs. this is a fact that is not offset by control schemes. Control schemes has NOTHING to do with GPU power.

As far as controls go, you can plug your controller or keyboard and mouse into a tablet. you can connect it to a large TV, and you can plug it into the wall. it would then act like normal console, except you can punplug it and take it with you and still use it unlike console.

Games supporting controllers without needing to remap things manually is another thing, but thats the fault of games.

No one is going to play Halo on a touch screen with an expected battery life under an hour, just like consoles didn't kill PC, mobile won't kill consoles. If tablets get standardised layout controls, massively improved batteries and the ability to project an image in real time to the TV and be responsive then yeah, consoles doomed, but we're nowhere near that yet.
I dont know what kind of tablet you use, but it must be horrible to run out of battery in half an hour. This is not normal.

Consoles didnt kill PCs because they were never more functional than PCs. meanwhile if tablets outperform consoles, they can act both as a console and a tablet, thus are more functional than a console.

Regards the Xbone's processing power, doesn't matter if Microsoft can make the games. PSone was less powerful than the N64, PS2 less than the Xbox and the Cube, but hardware sells on price and the products available on it. Microsoft has sorted the price, now they need some essential games and the Xbone will be fine, it's unlikely to match the PS4, but Microsoft will make money easy.
historical discrepancies aside (not going to bother proving that cube was less pwoerful than PS2), hardware sells on more than price. right now prices are the same, so people chose better hardware. in this case its PS4. However the largest seller is console loyalty. If price was the only factor - everyone would game on PC - PC gaming is much cheaper.

Its true that holding games ransom does affect sales. I know somone who bought PS3 for Dust 514. does not make it a good thing. Microsoft will not make money on it as much as you think though. with smaller install base exclusives become less useful.



The_Kodu said:
Tablets have to run a fairly robust operating system while consoles can dedicate far more of their run time to games and a far more minimal system.

As yet I don't see many Tablets providing even PS2 level game quality regularly.
This was true before 2006. When last gen lauched consoles also run robust OS.

I dont see many consoles providing PS2 level game quality regulary, whats your point?

The_Kodu said:
Which is pretty important as until later in the lifespan most other consoles are money sinks. They cost large amounts to develop and then have to be sold at a considerable loss until parts costs and better sourcing etc bring costs down. Most other companies sell at a quite a big loss per console just to gain the install base initially.
except that looking at hardware in current consoles, microsoft and sony should be making profit from hardware sales as is and that they dont only shows they have large overhead expenses.


Vykrel said:
why does it seem like this is the first generation where people dont realize that consoles are almost always sold at a loss in the beginning?
because this is the first generation where console tech is so weak it should be making profit at that price.

Rozalia1 said:
Okay yes you're right on the markup and all that, but... how can you say that yet hold the belief that PC will soon suddenly become all "Mainstream" and the platform everyone games on? Storebought PCs are what the common man is going to buy and those are expensive as you know. That is likely why the conception of PC as overly expensive will likely never go away come to think about it.
When you buy a table at IKEA, you get a bunch of parts, screws and instruction to construct it yourself. 99% of buyers can do this easily and build their own table. Building a PC is simpler than building that table. Thus, building it yourself can easily become the mainstream way to buy PCs, just like it became for furniture.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Strazdas said:
Its GOOD that music industry suffers. it is run by horrible people that does not deserve to make the millions they do. It needs a hard reset. Just look at all the content ID claims of police sirens being "a copyrighted song" and basically stealing ad revenue. Not that gaming is any better - Nintendo did the same.
.
I wont defend record companies but the music industry is in a bit of severe pickle....in that they just can't get people to pay for their shit, its no longer piracy but streaming...Stuff like Spotify aparently can't make up for it
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Vault101 said:
Strazdas said:
Its GOOD that music industry suffers. it is run by horrible people that does not deserve to make the millions they do. It needs a hard reset. Just look at all the content ID claims of police sirens being "a copyrighted song" and basically stealing ad revenue. Not that gaming is any better - Nintendo did the same.
.
I wont defend record companies but the music industry is in a bit of severe pickle....in that they just can't get people to pay for their shit, its no longer piracy but streaming...Stuff like Spotify aparently can't make up for it
noone wants to pay for 20th century market practices? tough shit. Can you tell me a single website that has a decent collection of music that i could legally buy and download? Oh and Itunes wont work because:
1. Itunes DRM
2. Terrible quality

Of course people wont buy for outdated sales, and since no legal modern exists, people will pirate. its a service problem. Also multiple artists have stated that they would much rather release music for free and earn money from tours because piracy vastly increased their audience at tours - where they get most of the money anyway.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Strazdas said:
noone wants to pay for 20th century market practices? tough shit.
I'm not talking about $20 a CD, I'm talking about any money at all

[quote/]Can you tell me a single website that has a decent collection of music that i could legally buy and download? Oh and Itunes wont work because:
1. Itunes DRM
2. Terrible quality[/quote]
I'm not sure to the extent of the DRM on songs, if streaming isn't an issue there is spotify which is built like itunes where you can find practically anything and its free (the only thing is you have to listen to an add every now and again if your not subscribed)

[quote/]Of course people wont buy for outdated sales, and since no legal modern exists, people will pirate. its a service problem.[/quote]
I'm not talking about piracey, I'm talking about the perfectly legit method of streaming, aparently they just can't make up the difference

[quote/]Also multiple artists have stated that they would much rather release music for free and earn money from tours because piracy vastly increased their audience at tours - where they get most of the money anyway.[/quote]
thats all good and well but thats not the case for every artist...and quite frankly people (non musicians) tend to parrot the same things

yes record companies were terrible, yes the serivces are the important factor....but lets not gloss over the fact that technology has really blured the lines on how to actually make money from their efforts, people generally don't want to pay for things
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Ultratwinkie said:
Never buy one from a store.
Never buy from Ebay.
Never buy from a website.
I bought mine from ebay!!


....not that I'd recomend that to anyone unless you know exactly what your doing...
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Ultratwinkie said:
Exactly, I seen some shady shit over there. Like this guy was selling an old dell and saying it was a high spec gaming computer that costs thousands and thousands of dollars, and saying it had a "full RAM kit for maximum gaming and a high end graphics card."

It was over 10 years old. And ran windows XP.

And people fell for it. Seriously.
heh....

it wasn't some random person but a professional seller...they had a bunch of "pre-mades" (that were more or less "just ok") but the real thing was you selected the upgrades/parts

I quardruple checked (and checked and checked and checked) and vaugly knew how much each part was ment to cost and its been going fine for almost 2 years now

the funny thing is though after an issue with Paypal/ebay....several dozen freaked out phone calls, a trek carrying a really heavy box while looking like I'm about to have a heart attatck and drop dead (at least 4 people aksed if I needed help) and then another freak out and angry email when it turns out it wont recognise the hardrive....followed by angels decending from the heavans and singing halleujeah when I open up the box...pop it back in and everything is fine (I think it was more likley a transit issue)

it would have been easyer to build one mabye XD
 

Baldr

The Noble
Jan 6, 2010
1,739
0
0
Let put this into perspective for some of you Nay-sayers.
Compared to the launch of the Sony Playstation 3 and the original Xbox, The Xbox One is a hit.
http://www.vg247.com/2009/10/30/sony-ps-division-has-lost-4-7-billion-since-launching-ps3/
 

gorfias

Unrealistic but happy
Legacy
May 13, 2009
7,453
2,022
118
Country
USA
One recent observation: I was at Gamestop. At their doorway was a stack of used consoles for sale (but not a very big price drop for a freakin used console!) It was a stack of PS3s and... Xbox Ones ($450 rather than $500, big whoop!) Not Wii U nor PS4.

This is the current sales chart:



5 Million is not that bad (not that good) for a system that has not been out a year yet. But of that 5 million, how many disproportionately so, have been taken right back to the store?

At this time, I'd like to play Forza 5. That's about it from that system.
 

Phlakes

Elite Member
Mar 25, 2010
4,282
0
41
Sorry to interrupt the daily Xbone hate thread, but that's actually not true at all. [http://www.neowin.net/news/no-microsoft-hasnt-lost-400-million-on-xbox-one?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter]

...this data reflects gross margins (revenue and the cost of revenue), not overall profit or losses. Secondly, and far more importantly, these figures are not totals for the year ? they represent the changes over the previous year...

...Xbox sales resulted in roughly $7.1 billion in revenues against roughly $5 billion in costs. That?s not a $400 million difference that outlets such as Forbes are citing...

...Still, however, the figures in Microsoft?s report don?t equate to profit or loss. Subtracting the $5 billion costs associated with Xbox production and other areas from Microsoft?s $7.1 billion Xbox revenue only represents gross margin, not the overall profit or loss.