There is nothing I like...

[Sassafrass]

OK, first things first.


Now, to the matter at hand.
Deal with it. Every big movie premier has people like this.
Twilight is the same due to the huge teenage girl fanbase which hides the sane fan base who doesn't follow the movie like a religion.
People like me, for example. Liked the first movie, gonna watch the second when I can, won't read the books, won't scream 'I love Cullen!!!' as I do not, being a man and won't let fangirls drag down all the fans who aren't as obsessive about Twilight.

Twitards are scourge of the earth!!!

Point quoting me here was?

 

[Julianking93]

The only thing more irritating than hardcore Twilight fans is hardcore Twilight haters. I don't understand, do you people feel threatened by this shit? I'm not going to claim that the books are harmless, because I think they reveal a pretty horriffic part of our culture, but seriously, I'm perfectly happy ignoring it, and I don't get to, because I constantly have fourteen-year-old boys coming along screaming about how horrible these books are and how stupid the people reading them are in order to hide how hurt they are that girls their age are so wrapped up in these characters that are completely unlike them.

Thank you.

I may hate Twilight (and pretty much every fad or "in thing") and those stupid fan girls who celebrate it like the second fucking coming of Christ, but I'm not gonna ***** about it just for the sake of bitching.

That being said, I understand, Twilight and Twilight Fan girls are annoying as fuck and probably need to be exterminated somehow but its just another stupid fad that will pass when the last movie comes out, then, you won't have to hear about it anymore.

 

[Bat Vader]

Stephanie Meyer's lack of intergrity to writing as well as a overwhelming lack of knowledge when it comes to the physiological nature behind vampires.

Uh, what physiological nature?

They're fictional creatures. They don't exist.

Bram Stoker may have thought up a psychological nature for Dracula when he wrote Dracula. Unless he was going off the psychological nature of Vlad the Impaler.

Physiological=/=Psychological. They're two dramatically different things.

I misread physiological and mistook it for psychological.

 

[Colours]

I think my best friend is going to see it

He's seen the first one about 4 times.

Yes, he.

 

[Guitarmasterx7]

Are they on the street under your apartment? If so, piss out your window. Then go get a few gallons of water and make an evening out of it. You're welcome.

 

[Cain_Zeros]

Stephanie Meyer's lack of intergrity to writing as well as a overwhelming lack of knowledge when it comes to the physiological nature behind vampires.

Uh, what physiological nature?

They're fictional creatures. They don't exist.

True...

However, if I am reading a book that has vampires in it, I want them to act like...I don't know...actual vampires. I'm not referring to characteristics, I am referring to the sparkling, the fact that Edward (from what I interpret) walks around in sunlight and if the Wikipedia article I read has any merit, he goes to like the Carribean in one of the later books.

I worded it awkwardly, I admit, but when Edward and his family defy all the logical components of being a vampire, its not worth the effort.

Does that clarify what I meant?

Oh damn...sorry, I didn't realize I mispelt the word. My bad.

To be fair, vampires dying in sunlight is a fairly recent development. Bram Stoker actually has Dracula out during the day at one point. Admittedly Dracula is considerably weaker during the day, but he's not a pile of ash by any stretch of the imagination. So that's not a complete departure from classic vampire lore on Meyer's part. The sparkling and the not feeding on humans, a little much for me. That and the movie was just fucking terrible. Maybe they should've hired some actors who can actually act.