Things that piss you off...in movies!

Recommended Videos

JackandTom

New member
Nov 17, 2010
603
0
0
Two words; Shia LaBeouf

http://img.perezhilton.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/shia-labeouf-mugshot__oPt.jpg

Ok, he doesn't piss me off THAT much. He was actually one the better things in Transformers 2

Something that really pisses me off is when a movie's fan base is made up of screaming kids. The best example being Twilight.....
 

Viral_Lola

New member
Jul 13, 2009
544
0
0
Guns in most movies. No, they can not make a car explode just by shooting them. No, just putting a silencer on it does not make it sound like a kitten hitting a pile of pillows. People having to cock guns repeatedly, on guns that you don?t need to cock. People never having to reload unless it?s for the plot.

Oh, and romance in movies. Not every movie has to have a romance plot in it. Also, some of the so called romance movies seems out right abusive.

People surviving falls that would otherwise have their ribs poking out of their backs.


I know every movie can?t be realistic. People go to movies to escape the real world but... I should probably stop talking. *Goes back to her cage*
 

mercswithmouths

New member
May 6, 2009
30
0
0
1) Not sticking to source material. Now I know producers have budgets and some people are hard cast but if you're making a book into a movie they could at least get the history of characters right.
For example: in Queen of the Damned, Marius de Romanus and Lestat de Lioncourt are both supposed to have blond hair and were NOT sire and fledgeling - now I get that Tom Cruise was a little too old to revise his role as the lead vampire but Stuart Townsend looked nothing like him. Also in Return Of The King, it wasn't Elrond that gave Aragorn the reforged sword before the main battle but his sons Elrohir and Elladan.

2) Plot HOLES or lack of continuity. Now I know everyone's probably yammered on about this but it needs to be said again.
For example: In Transformers 1 the All Spark gave Frenzy his body back without the Decepticon touching the thing but when Bumblebee DOES he still doesn't have a voice or get his legs back.
In Transformers 2, who the hell are Mudflap, Skids, Jolt and did we really need Leo? Also why is Bumblebee speaking through his radio again after speaking with his voice at the end of the first movie?
In Thor right at the beginning when we're having the 'nice' flashback of the Asgardian and Jotun war Loki is seen with his hands on the Casket of Eternal Winters and yet Odin's telling the story to his young sons. WTF?

3) Has no-one ever watched a movie in an movie? A part from Randy in Scream.

4) Why is it that in every movie with weapons EVERYONE is right-handed.
For example: apparently everyone in the Star Wars universe is right-handed.

5) This isn't something to do with movies but so-called Special Editions and Director's Cuts that have nothing to do with the actual movie apart from add money to the price.
 

historybuff

New member
Feb 15, 2009
1,888
0
0
Every female character is any action/scifi/thriller is either dumb as a box of rocks, evil, or a scantily clad "badass" who really just comes across as ridiculously overly hostile towards everyone and I cannot ever understand why people work with her. Movie makers as a group seem to be unable to understand what real women would do in an action/scifi/thriller situation.
 

JackTheBannana

New member
Aug 18, 2011
9
0
0
when dumb teenagers go after the monster,slasher and some invincible thing that does stuff UNARMED AND NOT CALL THE POILCE
 

anthony87

New member
Aug 13, 2009
3,727
0
0
The American Flag.

I'm not sure why but whenever the camera pans over a flag in slow motion it just really pisses me off. It just reeks of forced patriotism shite or something.
 

historybuff

New member
Feb 15, 2009
1,888
0
0
bahumat42 said:
Thrown in romance scenes, they are shallow and ineffective. If the plot didn't originally have the people hooking up, don't shoehorn it in.

This particular issue is made worse by the fact it often makes a lot of female characters one dimensional.
Oh yeah, and this, so hard.

Romance is not needed is every single freaking movie and forcing it just comes across as completely shallow and ridiculous.
 

bean burrito

New member
Jul 10, 2009
77
0
0
This isn't so much within the movie, but people I'm watching them with. Like when people talk through the movie, then demand you explain what just happened.
RAGE

I know it's a tad unrelated, but it just happened last night, and really pissed me off.
 

KeikakuKat

New member
Feb 10, 2011
33
0
0
Let me apologize for that on behalf of most Americans. We really need to stop doing that, sorry.
 

Father Tunde

New member
Dec 8, 2010
115
0
0
Unnecessary deaths. I was watching the Jurassic Park series the other day, and had to wonder, why did Udeksy have to die, and Eddie too? I know they're disaster films, but I can't help it, I like people!

mercswithmouths said:
1) Not sticking to source material. Now I know producers have budgets and some people are hard cast but if you're making a book into a movie they could at least get the history of characters right.
For example: in Queen of the Damned, Marius de Romanus and Lestat de Lioncourt are both supposed to have blond hair and were NOT sire and fledgeling - now I get that Tom Cruise was a little too old to revise his role as the lead vampire but Stuart Townsend looked nothing like him. Also in Return Of The King, it wasn't Elrond that gave Aragorn the reforged sword before the main battle but his sons Elrohir and Elladan.
I agree it's annoying when some major parts are cut from the films (e.g some of the memories from Harry Potter and the Half Blooded Prince), but I don't think we can afford this anal when it comes to source material. Aside from the fact it symbolised the fact that he has accepted Arwen's decision to stay with Aragon by giving him for sword his ancestor started it all with, it also saved the audience from being introduced to two new minor characters, and allowed us to see more of Hugo Weaving. Perfect!
 

DarkPanda XIII

New member
Nov 3, 2009
726
0
0
Viral_Lola said:
Guns in most movies. No, they can not make a car explode just by shooting them. No, just putting a silencer on it does not make it sound like a kitten hitting a pile of pillows. People having to cock guns repeatedly, on guns that you don?t need to cock. People never having to reload unless it?s for the plot.

Oh, and romance in movies. Not every movie has to have a romance plot in it. Also, some of the so called romance movies seems out right abusive.

People surviving falls that would otherwise have their ribs poking out of their backs.


I know every movie can?t be realistic. People go to movies to escape the real world but... I should probably stop talking. *Goes back to her cage*
Well, it is true, people do want to get away from the real world. So superhuman stunts can be viable as an awesome trick. Though truth to be told, watch *most* Jackie Chan movies, any stunts that are unbelievable actually happened. So if a guy who is roughtly average height (roughly 5'8), and can sail through the air and land on a building adjacent to the building he jumped off of, then I think most stunt-doubles can :D

Father Tunde said:
Unnecessary deaths. I was watching the Jurassic Park series the other day, and had to wonder, why did Udeksy have to die, and Eddie too? I know they're disaster films, but I can't help it, I like people!

mercswithmouths said:
1) Not sticking to source material. Now I know producers have budgets and some people are hard cast but if you're making a book into a movie they could at least get the history of characters right.
For example: in Queen of the Damned, Marius de Romanus and Lestat de Lioncourt are both supposed to have blond hair and were NOT sire and fledgeling - now I get that Tom Cruise was a little too old to revise his role as the lead vampire but Stuart Townsend looked nothing like him. Also in Return Of The King, it wasn't Elrond that gave Aragorn the reforged sword before the main battle but his sons Elrohir and Elladan.
I agree it's annoying when some major parts are cut from the films (e.g some of the memories from Harry Potter and the Half Blooded Prince), but I don't think we can afford this anal when it comes to source material. Aside from the fact it symbolised the fact that he has accepted Arwen's decision to stay with Aragon by giving him for sword his ancestor started it all with, it also saved the audience from being introduced to two new minor characters, and allowed us to see more of Hugo Weaving. Perfect!
Funny part is that it seemed Jackson often took faces out due to the fact that we'd have to deal with a hundred names at a time, so the smaller the roll, the less likely they'd appea...

http://lotr.wikia.com/wiki/Elladan_and_Elrohir

............Okay, you got me on that one.
 

Slayer_2

New member
Jul 28, 2008
2,475
0
0
How the "bad guys" can never hit a target 10 feet away with an automatic weapon. It's really not that hard, even if they're moving, you should be able to do more than shoot at the ground around their feet. And another thing that annoys me is when the "good guy" takes down a baddie and instead of taking the gun, he keeps on running along unarmed (cool guys don't use firearms, I guess). Also, why does nobody ever have to reload? In Cowboys Versus Aliens, I saw a REVOLVER fire 20+ shots without a break to reload. Extended mags? Oh and people repeatedly cocking guns to look cool and/or tough.

In short, any depiction of weapons in movies generally annoys me, and cars too, in some cases (Tokyo Drift, I'm looking at you).

EDIT: Damn it, I was ninja-ed

Viral_Lola said:
Guns in most movies. No, they can not make a car explode just by shooting them. No, just putting a silencer on it does not make it sound like a kitten hitting a pile of pillows. People having to cock guns repeatedly, on guns that you don?t need to cock. People never having to reload unless it?s for the plot.

Oh, and romance in movies. Not every movie has to have a romance plot in it. Also, some of the so called romance movies seems out right abusive.

People surviving falls that would otherwise have their ribs poking out of their backs.


I know every movie can?t be realistic. People go to movies to escape the real world but... I should probably stop talking. *Goes back to her cage*
 

irani_che

New member
Jan 28, 2010
630
0
0
Th3Ch33s3Cak3 said:
Unecessary romance plots.
Such as in:

Avatar
The Dark Knight
Braveheart
!
these were vital motivations within the plot, the heros actions would be meaningless if it wasnt to avenge a lost love, save their beloved or carry on in memory of a love unrequited

Th3Ch33s3Cak3 said:
Unecessary romance plots.
Such as in:
Fight Club


Forest Gump
!
without Marla there could be no Tyler, she was his psychological lynchpin

and jenny was Forest's reason top exist, the only thing he tried to do
 

Viral_Lola

New member
Jul 13, 2009
544
0
0
DarkPanda XIII said:
Viral_Lola said:
Guns in most movies. No, they can not make a car explode just by shooting them. No, just putting a silencer on it does not make it sound like a kitten hitting a pile of pillows. People having to cock guns repeatedly, on guns that you don?t need to cock. People never having to reload unless it?s for the plot.

Oh, and romance in movies. Not every movie has to have a romance plot in it. Also, some of the so called romance movies seems out right abusive.

People surviving falls that would otherwise have their ribs poking out of their backs.


I know every movie can?t be realistic. People go to movies to escape the real world but... I should probably stop talking. *Goes back to her cage*
Well, it is true, people do want to get away from the real world. So superhuman stunts can be viable as an awesome trick. Though truth to be told, watch *most* Jackie Chan movies, any stunts that are unbelievable actually happened. So if a guy who is roughtly average height (roughly 5'8), and can sail through the air and land on a building adjacent to the building he jumped off of, then I think most stunt-doubles can :D
Hey, welcome to my cage. Mr. Chan is awesome when it comes to stunts. *imagines a sequence of his awesome stunts. No, I am mad at the idea of a regular bloke falling five stories and him being just fine. It just seems like his femurs would be peeking up behind his knee caps.
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Well, I hate the attitude around certain films of just, "just leave your brain at the door to enjoy it!".

Fun and simple (let's say, Thor) does not have to equal fucking retarded (hello Transformers trilogy). "Leaving my brain at the door," should never be a fucking requirement.
Get_A_Grip_ said:
Jessie in Toy Story 2.

I want to burn her face with a magnifying glass.

I fucking hate her so much. I was relieved when she was hardly in Toy Story 3; all that fucking whining from her in the second made me want to choke her.

Th3Ch33s3Cak3 said:
Unecessary romance plots.
Such as in:
Fight Club
The Lovely Bones
The Lord of the Rings
The Wind that Shakes the Barley
Batman Begins+The Dark Knight
Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy
Pirates of the Carrabean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
Avatar
Blade Runner
Forest Gump
Braveheart
Inside I'm Dancing
The Guard
and many, many more!
I think you're rather stretching the definition of "unnecessary" with some of those.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Winking at the camera.

I don't mind over the top action, romance plots or chest pounding bravado, but as soon as a movie starts ridiculing it's own source material or story concept in order to meet the audience halfway I get seriously pissed.
 

IamLEAM1983

Neloth's got swag.
Aug 22, 2011
2,581
0
0
Hm. Let's see...

Bombastic patriotism: okay, jeeze, I get it, the movie's set in America and you guys have a troubled history and a fuckton of heroes and lots of reasons to be proud and all - but please, mister Emmerich, could you please give it a rest? Same to you, Michael. I'm sure even the most engrossed and disconnected Modern Warfare player out there would agree with me in saying that we've heard all about the badass nature of the American army one too many times.

We get it, you're a global superpower and I'm a little Canadian seagull shit in your gigantic windshield. Now stop stroking your dick, Hollywood, and give us *reasons* as to why we should care. You know, like The Hurt Locker did - and incredibly well at that.

Slasher flicks: yes. Not just a few tropes from that genre, but the entire fucking thing as a whole. The last good slasher I saw was The Rise of Leslie Vernon, and it worked because it actually operated as a deconstruction of all those tropes. Other than that, you have to look to the classics of the genre to have even the slightest sense of actual tension. The first two Nightmare on Elm Street flicks, for instance, or the first two Friday the 13th, and the first Halloween. Those are great references. Everything else? The more things progress, the more the series all devolve into self-parodies of self-parodies. They've all jumped the shark so many times the shark gave up and swam towards greener pastures.

So this covers everything in that one genre. The Final Girl cliché, the part where the slasher acts as a sort of avenging angel targeting kids acting "sinfully" - which makes me think Hollywood has a conservative boner in some areas - the part where they split up, the whole "walking through a threshold backwards so I don't see the lurking menace behind me" schtick, and the general impression that those movies are just there so we get to see annoying asshats get offed as graphically as possible.

In short, I'm extremely not surprised to hear that Doug Bradley finally gave up on Pinhead. He gave a pass for the Hellraiser remake project, and I think this is a pretty smart move on his part.

Hackers in movies: I honestly didn't know hacking meant you slid through glass skyscrapers rendered in bad mid-nineties CGI while typing furiously away on an IBM ThinkPad you'd tricked out with decals and Anarchy signs. Or, failing that, that pressing the Escape key never fails to fix everything. Thanks for teaching me all that, Nineties!

Granted, I understand that actual hacking would make for a pretty boring sight and experience to translate in the movies. It means calling up your target and lurking around their directories in boring old Unix or DOS prompts, and it's a lot more like being in a dark room with your blindfolds on than being this uberleet cyberwarfare specialist who can nuke the FBI from countries away and who manages to look stylish while doing so. It means a lot of trial and error, and it usually involve tedious processes.

So unless hacking eventually becomes so steeped in the cultural spectrum that it becomes acceptable and common to make a sitcom out of it, I guess we'll never see realistic depictions of hacking on the silver screen. I did appreciate the fact that the Matrix movies did use proper syntax and commands in places, however. Still, the notion that Trinity can type *that* fast is more than a little ridiculous.

The Internet in movies: Live Free or Die Hard fails both on the above level and in this one. The idea is that the 'net is where the hep twentysomething cats are all hanging, and that if you're not somewhere in that range, you're hopelessly out of touch with the world. This fosters the idea that the Everyman-type character will never touch a keyboard because "that hacker shit is for sissies", along with the usual "kids, these days..." stereotype.

I call it the Riverdale Paradox, personally. Y'know, how all the teens in Riverdale are continuously *into* things, while the adults are doomed to be forever *out*? The worst offenders being the school's faculty, where the principal goes out of his way to use fifty-dollar words 'cause he's old. Egads, Great Gadfrey, balderdash, poppycock and whatnot. It's stupid.

Hollywood, when will you realize that you do the same thing for every single generation? Before us, you slammed the Baby-Boomers for liking Rock and Roll. Does that mean you'll make us pass for grumpy old curmudgeons in forty years, when the new crop of twentysomethings is going to be knee-deep in virtual reality?

Gamers in movies: please, Hollywood. For the love of God, if you're going to show us a gamer, show us one that isn't a hyperkinetic man-child. Better still, show us a gamer that actually *plays a fucking game*, instead of randomly button-mashing and then crying out "Woot! High score!" or some shit.

Game development in movies: see above. Dev kits are not consoles, and the actual dev process is done on *computers*, Hollywood. Nobody can install some sort of SDK on a commercial console and expect to mash away in order to create something. Game development requires multiple skills across multiple areas that all need to converge *just right* so the finished product feels coherent.
 

Simeon Ivanov

New member
Jun 2, 2011
824
0
0
I hate it when the main character has a love interest that hasn't been involved in his life until the beginning of the movie.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
OutcastBOS said:
Well, I guess that makes sense. It just kinda ruins it for me when I know they survive it all.
Personally, what ruined it for me was how horrible they were. :p

-KC- said:
In horror movies:

"Hey let's split up!"


-.-
Actually, most horror movie clichés. Especially in this day and age where everyone owns a cell phone (Statistically, I think everyone owns 3). And 80% of America owns a gun.
 

DarkPanda XIII

New member
Nov 3, 2009
726
0
0
Viral_Lola said:
DarkPanda XIII said:
Viral_Lola said:
Guns in most movies. No, they can not make a car explode just by shooting them. No, just putting a silencer on it does not make it sound like a kitten hitting a pile of pillows. People having to cock guns repeatedly, on guns that you don?t need to cock. People never having to reload unless it?s for the plot.

Oh, and romance in movies. Not every movie has to have a romance plot in it. Also, some of the so called romance movies seems out right abusive.

People surviving falls that would otherwise have their ribs poking out of their backs.


I know every movie can?t be realistic. People go to movies to escape the real world but... I should probably stop talking. *Goes back to her cage*
Well, it is true, people do want to get away from the real world. So superhuman stunts can be viable as an awesome trick. Though truth to be told, watch *most* Jackie Chan movies, any stunts that are unbelievable actually happened. So if a guy who is roughtly average height (roughly 5'8), and can sail through the air and land on a building adjacent to the building he jumped off of, then I think most stunt-doubles can :D
Hey, welcome to my cage. Mr. Chan is awesome when it comes to stunts. *imagines a sequence of his awesome stunts. No, I am mad at the idea of a regular bloke falling five stories and him being just fine. It just seems like his femurs would be peeking up behind his knee caps.
That's true, though just saying that expect the extrodinary despite being irritated by it. The worse you'll see is the five story fall, which yeah, is unrealistic if they just hit the ground without trying to slow their plummet. I do need a light amount of realism to my shows, so somehow even magic can be believable.