Pyromaniac1337 said:
blindthrall said:
Pyromaniac1337 said:
what I get offended at is people that say God is a lie (despite there being as much proof that he DOES exist)
I really have to ask for a source on this one. God, until the concept is further defined, is a proposition that can nether be proven nor disproven. Even if It physically came down from the heavens, some people would still consider It mass hallucination or an alien. And you can't prove a negative, because there's always the possibility that It's out there and we just can't see It. Humanity has neither the perception nor the information to determine whether there was intent behind the creation of this universe. I used to be an atheist, but I think you cannot rule out such a nebulous concept as God entirely. It's presumptuous.
You cannot prove that He doesn't exist as much as you cannot prove that He does exist.
And here is where the obligatory mention of Russel's Teapot comes into play.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. God is an extraordinary claim with an extraordinary lack of evidence. It is still possible to believe that such a being exists, but without the proof required, you are taking it on faith.
We can disprove specific religious claims, and do at times (the power of prayer, miracle healings, etc.) We can take a look at the evolution of religion through history and its roots in human behavior, as well as human behavior's roots in other primate behavior. We can see that there is no
requirement for a God-being to exist, and that natural law alone is sufficient for what we observe. This does not preclude any existence of such a being, but given all that, is there any reason to believe in its existence with such fervor?
We cannot rule out entirely the existence of a deist, creator-style deity, but the modern fashionings of religion treat God as far more than that: an active and personal deity involved with the day-to-day affairs of man, yet whose activities are unnoticeable.
So, to be completely accurate, I don't find it impossible that God exists, I just find it far more probable that such a being is a human invention, which explains God's very human-like descriptions and behaviors, and belief in a God is due to a variety of factors, such as authority-teaching, ease of explanation, and personal comfort in the idea that you are being looked after.
I lost faith in God the same way I lost faith in Santa, there was no evidence for his continued existence and involvement in my life. All his supposed actions were actually due to the actions of others, and his supposed accomplishments were physically impossible. I therefore concluded that there was insufficient reason to believe in such a being. If I was later presented with extraordinary proof, as often occurs in Christmas movies, then I would believe again, but until that time, I will continue to hold that Santa Claus in the modern sense is a myth and a meme.
OT: "Alternative" medicine. My mother was(/is?) a believer in homeopathic remedies and acupuncture, among other things. The alt med "doctors" were fluffed up in a rather impressive array of accomplishments and study, and I assumed that they were legitimate doctors. I was later dismayed to find a startling lack of proof for all of it.
I was also dismayed to find that altmed also lashed out against vaccines, and furthermore that my parents had bought their argument. I hypothesize that poor reasoning is infectious.