Orlado Bloom as a Blacksmith! Why does he keep getting cast in this role? He could not forge his way out of a bleedin paper bag!
god saw just makes this so true.Onyx Oblivion said:Stop making so many sequels...
I think you're forgetting the fact that they have a gun. I imagine if you turned around right now and somebody was standing there with a gun and they begin to threaten you, you would probably listen to what they have to say. And if you don't and they cock the gun to make their point, the knowledge that the gun wasn't prepared before does absolutely nothing for you at that point.Kaboose the Moose said:Cocking a gun to intimidate someone
So the bad guy has his gun to someone's head, trying to get him to talk. Dude won't talk, so the bad guy cocks his gun. Oooh, dramatic
But think about it. It either means that:
1) The gun wasn't ready to fire before, thus the earlier threats had no real weight behind them, or
2) The gun was ready to fire before, thus the action is completely redundant (it's even sillier when they "pump" a shotgun to show that "shit is going to go down" because that just ejects the shell..a perfectly good shell)
So what's the point? I get that there's the intimidation factor, but come on, if the dude isn't already intimidated with a gun in his face, cocking it isn't gonna do much.
Worse than when it's being used to intimidate is when the person had every intention of firing and only waited to cock the gun at the last moment to look cool.
But even if you want to ignore how stupid it is, it's still completely played out. It seems like every movie or TV show that involves guns does it at some point. It may have been dramatic once, but its done to death.
Personally I have never witnessed somebody getting their head bashed over, and nor have I done any research on the plausibility of it, but if something as petty as that can ruin your moviegoing experience, then you have my pity. Because if that bothers you, it means one of two things: either you don't care about enjoying the movie and are and are looking for any possible stretch of reality (because everything in every action movie MUST be 100% accurate), or you are just incapable of analyzing something as the sum of its parts.Kaboose the Moose said:Knocking people unconscious with a hit to the head
Do you know what happens when people get blunt force trauma to the head? The cerebral cortex can become bruised - contused, axonal injury due to stretching can occure, or in the worse case, they can die.
Oh, but not in movie world. Get hit on the head and you just take a nice little nap. Every time, because nobody ever swings hard enough to kill or soft enough to do nothing. And after you wake up, the only lingering health problem is a bit of a headache.
And again, this is something that happens all the time. Often several times in one movie.
just see Resident Evil: afterlife, for the ammo part, where both alice's jumps down the inside glass building and spray bullets all the way down with TMP's that should only have around 30-40 bullets but they use over 1000+ xDmisterprickly said:When a main character is shot and dying. They still have enough in them to give a 15 min "goodbye speech" or a "futility of war" speech.
or
The black guy gets it first. What's up with that?!
or
Obligatory love interest and subsequent love scene.
or
"NNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" moments. They've been done to death.
or
Firing more shots than the clip holds. The old cowboy movies are famous for that.
or
Domino effects caused by champagne corks (or some other insignificant object).
More to come.
i think there's a real good critic from one of Movie bob's vids that talk about it, for trailers, like all those flashes, and camera mouvement where you can't see shit and it's disturbing...Kaboose the Moose said:I don't expect movies to be completely realistic. I like suspending my disbelief for the sake of something looking cool but there are some things that just make no sense. Furthermore, you find that, on top of being completely stupid, these tropes are in every single movie.
The three major ones for me:
Cocking a gun to intimidate someone
So the bad guy has his gun to someone's head, trying to get him to talk. Dude won't talk, so the bad guy cocks his gun. Oooh, dramatic
But think about it. It either means that:
1) The gun wasn't ready to fire before, thus the earlier threats had no real weight behind them, or
2) The gun was ready to fire before, thus the action is completely redundant (it's even sillier when they "pump" a shotgun to show that "shit is going to go down" because that just ejects the shell..a perfectly good shell)
So what's the point? I get that there's the intimidation factor, but come on, if the dude isn't already intimidated with a gun in his face, cocking it isn't gonna do much.
Worse than when it's being used to intimidate is when the person had every intention of firing and only waited to cock the gun at the last moment to look cool.
But even if you want to ignore how stupid it is, it's still completely played out. It seems like every movie or TV show that involves guns does it at some point. It may have been dramatic once, but its done to death.
Knocking people unconscious with a hit to the head
Do you know what happens when people get blunt force trauma to the head? The cerebral cortex can become bruised - contused, axonal injury due to stretching can occure, or in the worse case, they can die.
Oh, but not in movie world. Get hit on the head and you just take a nice little nap. Every time, because nobody ever swings hard enough to kill or soft enough to do nothing. And after you wake up, the only lingering health problem is a bit of a headache.
And again, this is something that happens all the time. Often several times in one movie.
Shooting things makes them explode
Mythbusters ruined this one for me.
It doesn't matter if you have a barrel full of gasoline. Shooting it isn't going to make it ignite. A bullet is a small piece of metal going really fast. There is no fire involved past the firing process. It won't ignite anything. Maybe, maybe, there's a slim chance that it could spark and that spark will cause ignition, but that's unlikely at best. You can't shoot something combustible and reliably expect it to explode.
For a long time I have been willing to suspend my disbelief far enough to allow for the big fiery movie explosions over realistic explosions because they're cooler to watch, but the time has come now. I cannot idly watch as commonsense takes a back seat with Hollywood action movies. If it has to be an unrealistic explosion, at least come up with better ways to deliver it.
Yes, I know it makes me a total nerd to be faffing about with trivial things like these, but I don't care. Any time I see any of these three things, it makes my left eye twitch. Oh and don't even get me started with turning every production into 3-fecking-D. Life is already in 3D, if you can't be arsed to put some realism into your explosions then don't add "realism" via 3D and have me fork out more money and spend 120mins wearing goggles that nap on the bridge of my nose.
Are/is there any similar things that you experience in movies that you have gotten irked about?
yes, and at this point, it's also a cliche in of itselfFarfelkugeln said:I dunno... Is saying "every single cliche" a bit too general?
ThisKorenith said:Featuring Nicholas Cage?
that's such an attitude worthy of the baudelarian's spleen...Rickyvantof said:I wish movies would stop having happy endings.
I agree with you, however I don't think that District 9 was a good example of the whole "Penetant Hero" thing, the main carecter is a prick for the entire movie, it is probably his defining feature, he has no sympathy for the prawns in the begining, he actually has some of their unborn children set on fire.KingGolem said:Oh, I have two tropes I hate the most:
The Evil CEO: This one pisses me off. All those anti-business lefties in Hollywood use the unscrupulous CEO as their villain, and far too often. A list: Avatar, District 9, Repo Men, Daybreakers, and there's probably a few I've forgotten. Never are there any, you know, decent businessmen (except Tony Stark and Lucius Fox, but those are exceptions). You know, a CEO doesn't try and maximize profit just because he's a greedy bastard, that's good business strategy, and in America it's the law. If you don't do everything in your power to maximize the profit for your investors, they can sue you. Oh, but all those liberals in Hollywood don't understand that or care, no. They go on always portraying every CEO as some kind of cross between George Bush and Darth Vader.
The Penetant Hero: This usually goes hand-in-hand with the above, that is, when our protagonist suddenly realizes that THE SYSTEM he's working for is evil and switches sides over to the resistance (na'vi, prawn, humans, cyborgs, etc.). Not only is it done to death by now, but it's also something I can't relate to. Real men don't do things they're ashamed of later, so neither do I. This is one of the main reasons I loved A Clockwork Orange; Alex may have been a horrible person who did horrible things, but he stuck to his guns the whole time. Refreshing.
EDIT: Oh, here's another one I forgot. CELEBRITY ACTORS. Yeah, I'm tired of seeing the same five to ten white, brown haired guys in my movies, especially Nicolas Cage. Damn, I'm sick of that guy. Confoundit, I am positive that there are more competent actors than them.