This can't end well; Westboro wing nutts send an open letter to Anonymous

Recommended Videos

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
crudus said:
Toriver said:
Another thing I find really interesting is that this flier shows that the WBC is fully aware of the coverage it gets in the media, and of the nature of that coverage. Which makes me repeat that, if you want the WBC to go away, stop showing what they do so much in the media! This is a perfect example of, "Ignore them and they go away." Really, the more exposure they get, the more they will feel galvanized to do more and more.
I actually like to encourage them. I have always viewed it as a taunt or dare of sorts. Sort of like *read in a 1980's sitcom narrator's voice* "Uh-oh! The Westboro Baptist Church has lost its attention from its controversial statement of 'God Hates Fags'. What are they going to come up with next?! Tune in next week to find out". Naturally that is slightly exaggerated. WBC is a creative group of people who knows how to get media attention. It is just fun to see what controversial thing they will say next. I don't know anyone who listens to them so I don't see how they really impact anything.
They real life troll funerals.

I don't care if it was the funeral of a serial pedophile rapist/killer, there's a point when you have to step back and say 'Fuck, the guys dead already.'

While I agree WBC has a right to free speech, but fucking funerals? I know a lot of people here don't believe in the sanctity of anything, but shit...
 

Smagmuck_

New member
Aug 25, 2009
12,681
0
0
I should not have surfed around their site... I found the "More Dead Troops" PDF... I'm just going to pretend I didn't see that and never mention it to my brother who's serving overseas... Or one of us, quiet possibly both of us, is going to wind up in the brig for assault and battery charges... Anon... Do your worst.
 

Burck

New member
Aug 9, 2009
308
0
0
Say goodbye to the black ink cartridges in your fax machines, WBC.

Then again, I'm not sure if the active portions of Anonymous actually give in to provocations like this. In the past, they've usually just gone after people they thought were doing something bad, but one of the lines in the PDF mentioned that Anon was planning to do this attack anyhow, so I guess it is gonna happen. Should be interesting, given what has happened to people who call-out Anon (i.e. Gene Simmons).
 

Cobelo

New member
Feb 27, 2009
116
0
0
This is looking to be disastrously entertaining. I will patiently wait to see if anon decides it's fit for retaliation. I personally can't wait for this. If you mess with the bull, you get the horns, so they say.
 

WhamBamSam

New member
Oct 29, 2009
211
0
0
DarthFennec said:
This is going to be hilarious! Bookmarking godhatesfags.com, so I get to see when they actually hack it ^^
My guess is that Anon will cover the site with gay porn. The WBC are too stupid and self-involved to mock, and anything too tongue in cheek will be hard to recognize as vandalism because of Poe's Law, so the only viable option to attack them is good old shock and awe.
 

TiefBlau

New member
Apr 16, 2009
904
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
Come on now, I can't be the only one who finds this situation ironic. A group of people who advocate free speech everywhere is threatening to attack a group of people because they use that right. I don't care how small of a minority they are, they have a right to preach their own thoughts and Anon, of all people, should respect that right.

Its hypocritical and rather silly. Attacking the WBC is like fighting a puppy. There is no point to it and these guys are persistent. Taking down their site is not gonna do anything.
Whoa, since when did anon care about free speech? These guys aren't internet vigilantes. They photoshop pictures of retarded kids. It's not about being right or wrong. It's about their sense of humor.
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
I don't like the WBC. No one does,but you can't preach free speech and then attack someone because they use it. Its hypocritical.
When has that ever been a problem to anon? Well, if WBC is right nothing will happen.

vietfighter said:
Anon is not preventing them from acting like fools. Anon is simply going to firebomb their site. Difference.
Good point. I forgot about the semantics.
 

Bon_Clay

New member
Aug 5, 2010
744
0
0
Am I the only one who hopes they DON'T attack them? What would be the point, they're trying to instigate it themselves. The best course of action would be to either completely ignore them or send them some flowers or something.

Anon isn't a personal army for anyone, giving them publicity is just helping them. So they should do some minimal things to completely troll and confuse them, and then move on to more important things.

Maybe sarcastically say they agree with their message? Though using hyperbole about Westboro would be kinda hard...
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
TiefBlau said:
maddawg IAJI said:
Come on now, I can't be the only one who finds this situation ironic. A group of people who advocate free speech everywhere is threatening to attack a group of people because they use that right. I don't care how small of a minority they are, they have a right to preach their own thoughts and Anon, of all people, should respect that right.

Its hypocritical and rather silly. Attacking the WBC is like fighting a puppy. There is no point to it and these guys are persistent. Taking down their site is not gonna do anything.
Whoa, since when did anon care about free speech? These guys aren't internet vigilantes. They photoshop pictures of retarded kids. It's not about being right or wrong. It's about their sense of humor.
When they started bringing down sites just for refusing to fund or mention wikileaks. When they started protesting in foreign countries where that right doesn't exist. When they started bringing down government websites that tried to bring down wikileaks.

They give off an anarchist vibe most of the time. Do what you want, when you want.
crudus said:
maddawg IAJI said:
I don't like the WBC. No one does,but you can't preach free speech and then attack someone because they use it. Its hypocritical.
When has that ever been a problem to anon?
.....Touche.
 

duke17776

New member
Sep 13, 2010
2
0
0
anon's attack will not be about stopping them spreading their point of view. (even if it is fucked up) it will be for called anon out. good luck with that internet bill WBC.


also maybe WBC will better understand:
And Jesus asked him, "What is thy name?" And he answered, saying, "My name is Legion: for we are many.
 

Andrew_Waltfeld

New member
Jan 7, 2011
151
0
0
Witty Name Here said:
Anonymous, I'm Roman Catholic, and while I may be against your "protests" most of time, I just have to say... God's luck on your Holy Crusade, Anonymous, no matter how this is seen by Westboro, to me this is the exact definition of a righteous crusade, bring down their servers, crush their picket signs and hate speech between your boots! Show them the wrath of a vengeful and angry God, drag them off the internet by their hair and show them that their philosophy of hatred towards others has guaranteed them not salvation, but the wrath of a legion of unseen face, the wrath of their own God even, the Wrath of the world against them! IUSTITIA IN NOMINE VINDICTA!!!! MWUAHAHAHA!!!
Lol I agree.

Frankly if there is some people I hate more: Arrogant people... and Bible down your throat thumping people.

And this is coming from a christian raised kid whose is Agnostic. They have both of my pet peeves. Sit back and hope Anon does what it does best. Cause I can you this - God doesn't give jack **** about WBC. Nor is god on their side. He doesn't take sides. Assuming he exists.

Have Fun Anon. Tear them up. Nobody will care for them and probably will be on your side. Hell I know I will be on yours.
 

GodofCider

New member
Nov 16, 2010
502
0
0
Toriver said:
Another thing I find really interesting is that this flier shows that the WBC is fully aware of the coverage it gets in the media, and of the nature of that coverage. Which makes me repeat that, if you want the WBC to go away, stop showing what they do so much in the media! This is a perfect example of, "Ignore them and they go away." Really, the more exposure they get, the more they will feel galvanized to do more and more.
Nonsense, letting something fester is never a wise decision. Best to get it out in the open and clear it up.
 

Krion_Vark

New member
Mar 25, 2010
1,700
0
0
I want the WBC to be right and be the only ones taken away from the Earth by God. Then we can have a world free of the WBC.
 

TeeBs

New member
Oct 9, 2010
1,564
0
0
Oh, Westboro... you so crazy...

I really want Anon to just turn Godhatesf**s.com into a gay porn site.
 

Toriver

Lvl 20 Hedgehog Wizard
Jan 25, 2010
1,364
0
0
GodofCider said:
Toriver said:
Another thing I find really interesting is that this flier shows that the WBC is fully aware of the coverage it gets in the media, and of the nature of that coverage. Which makes me repeat that, if you want the WBC to go away, stop showing what they do so much in the media! This is a perfect example of, "Ignore them and they go away." Really, the more exposure they get, the more they will feel galvanized to do more and more.
Nonsense, letting something fester is never a wise decision. Best to get it out in the open and clear it up.
But how do you "clear up" something like this aside from effectively shunning them by ignoring them? You can't forcibly make them disband or force them to shut up. They are protected from that by the first amendment. What else can you do aside from what is already being done?
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
maddawg IAJI said:
crudus said:
maddawg IAJI said:
I don't like the WBC. No one does,but you can't preach free speech and then attack someone because they use it. Its hypocritical.
When has that ever been a problem to anon?
.....Touche.
Besides the pool of people that is anon changes fairly regularly. Naturally their morals and methods would change with that.