Tits on the YouTube Homepage

[Trolldor]

Why are the boobs the focus and not the fact he's playing with her tangerine?

 

[Crash 9000]

So, I can't view a woman breast-feeding because I'm 17. Yet I can see breasts in a sexual context because Google gets money for it? HERP DERP!

 

[xchurchx]

Its the end of the world
srsly tho that "Holy Crap TITs" was my anitial reaction

 

[Odbarc]

Breasts aren't sexual and they're not doing anything.
I have my ad-blockers on and always up to date so I never see these types of things anyway.

 

[awesomeClaw]

Breasts aren't sexual

Breasts aren´t sexual.

Now that´s something i thought i´d never hear. Yes, boobs are hot. Undeniable fact. Unless you´re homosexual. Or a women. But otherwise, hot. You can´t deny that, bro.

OT: EPIC LULZ. This will be hilarious!

 

[imnot]

I had that to, I loled.

 

[Jazoni89]

Breasts aren't sexual and they're not doing anything.

Breasts aren´t sexual.

Now that´s something i thought i´d never hear. Yes, boobs are hot. Undeniable fact. Unless you´re homosexual. Or a women. But otherwise, hot. You can´t deny that, bro.

OT: EPIC LULZ. This will be hilarious!

No, because he isn't a hormonal infused teenager like others in this topic.

 

[NinjaDeathSlap]

And so what? In Denmark that kind of pictures are seen everywhere.

and in other countrys, sadly, we don't.

And in the UK/USA especially, this will cause about 11 million do-gooders to take to the streets demanding YouTube should be banned lest we all become sex obsessed weirdo's thanks to 1 image.

 

[Jon Shannow]

Yeah but the only people who will see this (maybe) are the British, and after that "We Dare" fiasco, I think we've established that they're some pretty liberal people...

what's the "we dare" fiasco? because i know of at least 300,000 daily mail readers who will claim that this is a sign at the newer generation are all rapists in waiting

 

[JoshGod]

I would not mind this, but as i opened youtube my mom walked in...

 

[darkstarangel]

Usually this is the inevitable event when your parents or girlfriend walks in on you with that on your screen. As according to murphy's law.

 

[thylasos]

Holy crap, an image of a couple of human mammaries? A pair of which is owned by slightly more than 50% of the world's population?

We've got to get over this, really.

 

[SextusMaximus]

And so what? In Denmark that kind of pictures are seen everywhere.

Key words: IN DENMARK.

It's a big thing over here because the Government are all up their own arses with things like nudity.

 

[MindBullets]

Saw this last night. To my surprise, the picture is still there as of noon today. Surely at least one person has let YouTube know about this?

I'm just waiting for the inevitable storm of outrage now. Should be somewhat entertaining.

 

[mobsterlobster]

And so what? In Denmark that kind of pictures are seen everywhere.

Same in Germany, I went to Cologne in September and on the U-Bahn was a big picture of a women showing a cheeky bit of nipple, and then we got back to the hostel and put the telly on, there was a show about a women getting a boob job. She had them out every 10 seconds. We just sat there staring at the TV for an hour. But I live in England so now I'm gonna have to put up with all the stupid newspaper articles banging on about how evil Youtube is.

 

[Jazoni89]

And so what? In Denmark that kind of pictures are seen everywhere.

Key words: IN DENMARK.

It's a big thing over here because the Government are all up their own arses with things like nudity.

Really UK?

See embrassing bodies (shown before the watershed no less), and the UK newspapers (daily star, and Sun.)

You think its bad here, The US would like a word.

 

[Distorted Stu]

Im watcing an episode now... Its terrible >_<

FURRIES D:

Also, soon to be most watched thing on youtube? Yes.

 

[sheah1]

Since when does Youtube allow nudity in the first place? Now I'm just confused...

Unless its for purely recreational reason such as tv advertising like this.

Seriously guys, its just boobs. I would hate it if you guys went into some sort of art gallery any time soon.

Only Youtube can't really claim to be showing artistic nudes, can it? It's showing nudity as an advert, not art - doesn't really compare, laws against that sort of thing in public etc etc.

To quote the highest rated comment: "youtube you fucking idiots there is[sic] thousands of children on this site and you put in on&#65279; the front page"! Won't someone think of the children?!

I personally knew what a breast looked like since the age of eight.

When i was nine, me and my friend at the time brought the Sun just for page 3, and we used to collect all our nude pictures for our secret stash.

Children are much more clever than you think.

Oh, for sure - my post was kinda satirical, but still, you don't need to throw semi-nude images at younger viewers just because they can find them if they want.

So...it's not exactly going to hurt them, and it's not going to scar them for life or anything.

Best that they get exposed to it early, so it wouldn't be such a big deal later in life.

Well...that's my opinion anyway.

Plus any kid able body enough to go on youtube is pretty much grounds for itself. Its not like anyone under the age of say eight, or nine will ever go on Youtube. They are more interested in jelly, and jumping (to quote Matthew Wright from the Wright stuff).

Also, youtube is home to a LOT of god awful stuff that's ten times worse than nudity, so, comparatively, this ain't all that bad. You can't buy a newspaper and find five solid minutes of a guy calling the Justin Bieber defender the world's worst words.

 

[Lord Kloo]

This is quite bad considering little kiddies are allowed on youtube you would have thought that youtube wouldn't even have allowed you to look at the page unless you had an over 18 account..

But as I really don't care that this has happened might as well step down from the soap box, grab a cuppa, and watch the viewings of this program go through the roof as many young teenagers, who haven't discovered porn, go nuts on this video...