I was just about to ask the same thing. He has been blatantly trolling all morning.The infamous SCAMola said:Hey mods, here's one for ya: Why has AlexTheKidd not been banned or at least put on a suspension yet?
I was just about to ask the same thing. He has been blatantly trolling all morning.The infamous SCAMola said:Hey mods, here's one for ya: Why has AlexTheKidd not been banned or at least put on a suspension yet?
...You mean like how people use gay or retarded to mean stupid? Which I've seen people use substantially more than the one instance of 'christian'? I'm not trying to say this offensively at all, so please don't misinterpret me when I say get over it. You're reading too much into it, and it seems you care that he used the word 'christian' because you are one. Again, don't take anything I'm saying the wrong way.scotth266 said:This Christian (Catholic, actually) would disagree. He was using the word Christian as a synonym with stupidity. That's offensive, regardless of whether or not he intended it to be a joke.Xojins said:I don't think he was saying that just to target Christians, he was using it in the same way anyone says gay or retarded. Doesn't really seem like a bannable offense to me. That's my opinion.
Sorry, that fails to prove to me that he thinks less of it than Yahtzee thinks of people with developmental issues, or Katy Perry thinks of gay men (I don't really listen to Katy Perry so I'll assume she doesn't like them). From what I read, Mobius is merely saying that he doesn't believe in christianity and presenting an argument as to why. He actually seems fairly knowledgeable about religion. He does disagree with you, but he doesn't really say anything I'd classify as offensive.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Snip
He was using it in the EXACT SAME WAY as anyone says gay or retarded. I really don't understand why people don't realize this. Click the link he added for the word 'christian', read his post, and then read rolan7's entire post explaining the christian thing. I'm sorry, but I don't believe he said that just because he hates christians, and you can't tell me otherwise and expect me to believe it. I also realize that I will not convince you. I'm stating my opinion, so let's please just drop that aspect. Neither of us know what his true intentions were, so let's stop speculating.Ultrajoe said:Again: It wasn't just that postXojins said:I don't think he was saying that just to target Christians, he was using it in the same way anyone says gay or retarded. Doesn't really seem like a bannable offense to me. That's my opinion.Cheeze_Pavilion said:snip
And to clarify, he wasn't using it like people use 'Retarted' or 'Gay', because those are insensitively used to attack the victim, incidentally attacking the disabled or homosexual. Mobius used the term 'Christian' to attack those of faith, anvilling it into that situation with little provocation, going so far as to provide a link to show everyone his intentions. He wasn't using it to imply that the victim of his ire was something to be detested, he was trying to link Christianity with things he percieved as negative, out of one of his many long-standing grudges. Having spoken to him via IM's and PM's, I don't doubt that he believed the majority of the things he said. Unprovoked attacks are bannable, that is what he did.
Did anyone use the report button?The infamous SCAMola said:Hey mods, here's one for ya: Why has AlexTheKidd not been banned or at least put on a suspension yet?
I totally did!, yay me, I'm being helpful.paulgruberman said:Did anyone use the report button?The infamous SCAMola said:Hey mods, here's one for ya: Why has AlexTheKidd not been banned or at least put on a suspension yet?
I did as well. I can't answer for anyone else, but I know I saw a handful of the usual "+1 to post count, report and move on" replies.ColdStorage said:I totally did!, yay me, I'm being helpful.paulgruberman said:Did anyone use the report button?The infamous SCAMola said:Hey mods, here's one for ya: Why has AlexTheKidd not been banned or at least put on a suspension yet?
Just wanted to be sure, as action had already been taken when the tech team ran across him through another method by coincidence.Symp4thy said:I did as well. I can't answer for anyone else, but I know I saw a handful of the usual "+1 to post count, report and move on" replies.ColdStorage said:I totally did!, yay me, I'm being helpful.paulgruberman said:Did anyone use the report button?
I have no fear, for with the hamsters' help, I shall see the wheel matrix, and can move like they do.ColdStorage said:Also, are you a bit sad that since you probated yourself to make a point during march mayhem that Virgil wont give you that Neo Badge?
I figured, but I think the message in my post wasn't quite as clear as I intended. I didn't mean my own moderation, I don't care about it at all, but sometimes when I see the moderation of others, I think they were suspended or something like that for no reason. However, this isn't my forum and I can't decide the rules, so the decision of what's okay/not okay isn't up to me.wilsonscrazybed said:I need to clarify something here, we have a new moderation feature that allows us to send you a "warning." This warning acts as a note in your user history. If you get a forum warning it's officially a "Hey, don't do this anymore." message and nothing more. Warnings will not show up outside of your user history, and they will not affect your badges either.PersianLlama said:Meh, even though I've been moderated like, once, I think, and it was just probation, it's the moderation that has made me come to the forums less and less often.
Too bad all the people who get banned/suspended are the ones who usually entertain me with their posts.
Well I am sorry that you misinterpreted my tone or whatever, especially since I clearly stated that nothing I said was meant in an offensive way. This is what I was getting at in my previous post: you don't know my intentions, so please don't think you do. I'm being assertive in my opinion, and it's a little frustrating when people don't understand what you're trying to say.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Snip
Many months back -over half a year ago actually- wilson banned himself as an experiment. Thankfully, he could unban himself as well.Simalacrum said:if a mod is theoretically found to be breaking the rules, is it possible for them to receive the banhammer as well? (theoretically speaking of course, I'm not suggesting that its happened before) In essence, is there anyone who watches the Watchmen?
Buh? I was here around then, wasn't I? How did I miss that?Lord Krunk said:Many months back -over half a year ago actually- wilson banned himself as an experiment. Thankfully, he could unban himself as well.Simalacrum said:if a mod is theoretically found to be breaking the rules, is it possible for them to receive the banhammer as well? (theoretically speaking of course, I'm not suggesting that its happened before) In essence, is there anyone who watches the Watchmen?
He was talking about it in a thread, but it was so long ago that I can't remember which one.Danny Ocean said:Buh? I was here around then, wasn't I? How did I miss that?Lord Krunk said:Many months back -over half a year ago actually- wilson banned himself as an experiment. Thankfully, he could unban himself as well.Simalacrum said:if a mod is theoretically found to be breaking the rules, is it possible for them to receive the banhammer as well? (theoretically speaking of course, I'm not suggesting that its happened before) In essence, is there anyone who watches the Watchmen?