Tokyo's Anti-Loli Bill has Passed in Committee.

Recommended Videos

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Ih8pkmn said:

That's all I have to say on this subject.

EDIT:

Aw, crap I just realized: This is going to kill a good deal of Manga, isn't it?
Ah, well. At least there's still American graphic novels, right?
Maybe this will help Weeaboos learn to appreciate their own culture instead of decry it in favor of Japanese. It would be a welcome change to not listen to them bash american or canadian stuff.

And we still have graphic novels, which are still awesome.
 

2733

New member
Sep 13, 2010
371
0
0
I did a little research and this is what I got

Tokyo already has the power to designate anything that is too sexually stimulating for minors OR too sadistic for minors OR too likely to cause criminal acts among minors OR cause suicide among minors as ?harmful material?, and force such material to be treated as adult only material.

and the new law says that any sex act that would be illegal in real life or shows incest can also be designated as adult material or harmful material.

so it seems this will not affect your favorite games, manga, and anime. Cathrine is just as likely to see a release as ever, Bleach will still be in Weekly Shonen Jump, and whatever anime you are watching will still be on Hulu or wherever you watch it.

I think.
 

MagicMouse

New member
Dec 31, 2009
815
0
0
AC10 said:
Given how small Japan is I'm wondering what's stopping people from just jumping on the bullet train to the next town over to get this stuff?
The Pacific Ocean.


I am not in total disagreement of this law. I mean, they aren't banning the stuff, just making it only available to 18+ right?
 

Bloodstain

New member
Jun 20, 2009
1,625
0
0
As someone who has a fetish for lolicon...HOW DARE THEY?!

ajemas said:
a loli image is clearly designed for the viewer to get off on, and should (in my opinion) not have any right to exist.
I would like you to elaborate. Why?
 

Maze1125

New member
Oct 14, 2008
1,679
0
0
Soviet Heavy said:
Maze1125 said:
Soviet Heavy said:
It overlaps a bit with pedophilia.
A bit?
Yes. While Pedophilia pertains to prepubescent children, Lolita Complex focuses on those within the first stages of puberty.
I've heard people use the term "loli" to refer to the depiction of a young girl of any childhood age, certainly not just the first stages of puberty.

May I see your source for your claim?
 

Mstrswrd

Always playing Touhou. Always.
Mar 2, 2008
1,724
0
0
ajemas said:
The problem is that real child pornography, at least the owning of it, is actually explicitly legal in Japan. In actuality, the DPJ forced the people writing the bill to remove a clause stating that owning real CP is illegal, while leaving everything else alone. So, fake stuff, the lolicon hentai and shotacon hentai, is illegal, but owning pictures of actual children naked and/or in some kind of sexual sitatution is totally legal (note that distribution of CP is illegal, but actually owning it is a-okay).

This is one of the reason I'm pissed. Real stuff makes me want to commit horrible acts of violence, and murder the people with the pcitures of real children being abused and exploited, and yet the fake stuff isn't allowed? No. I can't accept that.

Again, part of my fear, while extreme (I do admit that you are right in saying that they way I described it is extreme), Japan does have a histoy of this being the norm. That's why entire genre's of hentai exist in the first place; to circumvent laws about pornography (specifically, Tentacle hentai was modernized and kind of "reinvented" to get around laws forbidding male reproductive organs from being drawn). All I see this doing is alienating entire market and reversing Japan back to what they were forced to stop doing in the first place.

Not only that, but people are already seeing their manga being cancled, forcebly toned down, etc. Yeah, okay, a BL (Boy's Love) manga is probably pretty explicit, and children shouldn't read it (seriously, they can get pretty sexually graphic), but some manga companies are already forbidding any usage of school settings in most ways. That would make it so brilliant things like Code Geass or really funny things like Lucky Star (anime, yes, but the rules still apply) will be that much more difficult to make happen, as simply putting the characters in a school is apparantly enough for companies to fear the manga receiving an "18 only" rating, even if that fear is, for something like Lucky Star, wholly unfounded as nothing ever happens, sexually or otherwise.

And the very vague clause that is about using the laws "properly" doesn't sooth my anger at all, as it's even more vague than the already extraordinarily vague law it is supposed to be limiting.

As I feel will be a common theme in these posts, I apologize if I came off as incredibly angry at you. The anger was not directed towards you.
 

2733

New member
Sep 13, 2010
371
0
0
http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2003/all/boxshots2/957985_121474.jpg
observe the Japanese box for dead rising 2, that already has a red sticker of harmful content and it is out everywhere, I think we are over reacting.

If someone can get a better picture of the Japanese box please post it.
 

Ashcrexl

New member
May 27, 2009
1,416
0
0
from a purely objective standpoint, this is terrible. free speech yall!

but from a more subjective standpoint, i cant help feeling a little glad this kind of thing is being phased out.
 

Fwee

New member
Sep 23, 2009
806
0
0
If it's just getting put into a higher-regulated "adults only" category, fine. Total bans and elimination can be even more harmful.
 

Soviet Heavy

New member
Jan 22, 2010
12,218
0
0
Maze1125 said:
Soviet Heavy said:
Maze1125 said:
Soviet Heavy said:
It overlaps a bit with pedophilia.
A bit?
Yes. While Pedophilia pertains to prepubescent children, Lolita Complex focuses on those within the first stages of puberty.
I've heard people use the term "loli" to refer to the depiction of a young girl of any childhood age, certainly not just the first stages of puberty.

May I see your source for your claim?
I am mostly referring to the archetypical representation of loli. I roll things from teenage up into Rule 34, and I flat out refuse to classify baby porn as anything other than satanic.
 

Palademon

New member
Mar 20, 2010
4,167
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Wow... I wonder if there will be riots (of otakus, if nothing else).
Damn right.
*deep breath* NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!
That is all.
 

ajemas

New member
Nov 19, 2009
500
0
0
Mstrswrd said:
ajemas said:
Snippity snip.
Real child pornography is legal there? What the shit?! Somebody might be able to throw the (very weak) justification that loli isn't real, and therefore isn't harmful, but there is NO justification for actual child pornography. It is one of the very worst things that humans are capable of: screwing up a young child for life, just to get their kicks.
Anyway, I do agree with you in that the bill is a bit extreme. However, I feel that with a little bit of work, it could cut down on the really sick loli stuff. Manga and Anime make Japan a lot, and if it is OK to show to your average westerner, in the interest of making money, I think that it will be allowed.
By the way, even though I'm not the most perceptive guy on the planet, I know that you aren't mad at me.
 

BioHazardMan

New member
Sep 22, 2009
444
0
0
Spleenboy said:
There's nothing wrong with loli.

Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it should be banned.

People have the right to get off on whatever they please, as long as it causes no harm.

And don't give me the "it does cause harm, it facilitates paedophilia" bullshit.

Violent video games, movies, and literature don't cause violent crime, therefore loli does not cause paedophilia.
Sorry to not contribute much, but this is my exact thought process.
 

ajemas

New member
Nov 19, 2009
500
0
0
Bloodstain said:
ajemas said:
a loli image is clearly designed for the viewer to get off on, and should (in my opinion) not have any right to exist.
As someone who has a fetish for lolicon...HOW DARE THEY?!
I would like you to elaborate. Why?
Why, you ask? Because it's depicting a CHILD getting raped! You could make all of the arguments that you want about how it isn't real, or that nobody is getting hurt, but it doesn't change the fact that it is offensive and wrong.

Jarrid said:
That's really low, even for a closed-minded bigot.
I'm not questioning your right to exist.

Well, I guess it's only fair that Japan censor the hell out of anime and manga seeing as they love the US and their crazy policies so much. It only took them what, 50+ years to catch up to McCarthyism and The Comics Code, maybe in a few more decades they'll try to ban video games...
I'm a bigot for opposing media depicting underage women get violated? How does that work, exactly. Also, I'm running out of euphemisms for "intercourse".
 

Troublesome Lagomorph

The Deadliest Bunny
May 26, 2009
27,258
0
0
Sgt. Dante said:
Hail Fire 998 said:
While I'm all for getting rid of all that... dirty loli stuff, I wonder if it will start biting into other things.
Depending on the wording it can mean A LOT of thing can be deemed bad and gotten rid of.

Which can mean a drop in manga like Negima.
And anything else like it.
Which is.. VERY VERY BAD.

But if it just bans loli H and the like, then HELL YEAH!
not quite, the ban is on the manufacturing or sale of any sexual content that may be deemed harmful to children. so while loliH will be on the strictly banned list, soft ero's like Negima, love hina and the rest in a kinda grey area that will require strict moderation and control.

and that's only in amine and manga, the game development business is going to take a hit as i can't see this allowing catherine to be released unless it's finished by April (when the bill takes effect)
Ah shit. That's what I was fearing.
 

ShadowsofHope

Outsider
Nov 1, 2009
2,623
0
0
ajemas said:
Bloodstain said:
ajemas said:
a loli image is clearly designed for the viewer to get off on, and should (in my opinion) not have any right to exist.
As someone who has a fetish for lolicon...HOW DARE THEY?!
I would like you to elaborate. Why?
Why, you ask? Because it's depicting a CHILD getting raped! You could make all of the arguments that you want about how it isn't real, or that nobody is getting hurt, but it doesn't change the fact that it is offensive and wrong.
Would you rather lolicon be banned and the likely possibility those individuals whom like it go to real child pornography instead? In which actually harms real individuals, and not fictional, unrealistic looking characters?

Fictional characters are fictional. Which is why fictional movies can get away with depictions torture, rape, murder, theft, and likewise, while smut films are obviously banned, although they tend to share the same content.
 

Maze1125

New member
Oct 14, 2008
1,679
0
0
ajemas said:
the fact that it is offensive and wrong.
That's not a fact, it your opinion.
It's an opinion I happen to share, but that doesn't make it fact.
 

Cat Cloud

New member
Aug 12, 2010
144
0
0
Considering that this is Japan and considering the level of sexual wierdness they have, this will probably affect only the more extreme manga/anime/etc. It won't be as strict as laws in the US, and there are quite a few anime and manga that doesn't have sex acts portrayed in them. Sure, the characters might have big breasts and skimpier clothes but that doesn't make it porn.

And their not making it illegal or banning it from existance; their making it inaccesable to kids. If your worried about your anime porn, you'll probably still be able to buy it. America's laws regarding porn are much stricter than Japan's. In the US, porn is not regarded as "art" and therefore isn't protected by freedom of speech.

This is Japan we're talking about. They have different cultral standards when it comes to sex and violence. How many articles have you seen about Japanese people and news media repeating the "think of the children!!1!11!!" line?