Uhuh...America being the most well known, and influential country in the known universeAlkarin said:well even if the official world language was English im sure a lot of countries would be PISSED because of their hate towards America. that's the main problem with switching it to English
Why would people be pissed because of their hatred for America? Surely they'd hate England...or am I missing something.Alkarin said:well even if the official world language was English im sure a lot of countries would be PISSED because of their hate towards America. that's the main problem with switching it to English
Meh, I'm one of those nutjobs who believes that a really old book is not the secret to spirituality.naftali1 said:Losing a language could be religiously devastating more than culturally. For example, if Hebrew was lost there is no way to study the Torah because a Torah scroll has to be written in Hebrew.Azeban said:(I've heard the major loss to culture as reason against this idea before, but it has never been explained what makes losing a language so culturally devastating.)
Sure there are translated copies, but they lose a lot of meaning in translation. Each letter has it's own spiritual meaning that is lost.
Wow, you didn't read my post before commenting. Here's your cookie.TerribleTerryTate said:Variety is the spice of life. I love the fact going to a new country means a new culture and language. I'm going to guess you mean switch to English too? How would you feel if it was somehow decided we'd all have to speak Chinese, or Russian? I'm going to guess your opinion on a global language might change a bit.
yea pretty sure it doesnt lose 'meaning' when its translated. otherwise thats like saying 'if you read a bible in english not latin you arent as christian as i am'Azeban said:Meh, I'm one of those nutjobs who believes that a really old book is not the secret to spirituality.naftali1 said:Losing a language could be religiously devastating more than culturally. For example, if Hebrew was lost there is no way to study the Torah because a Torah scroll has to be written in Hebrew.Azeban said:(I've heard the major loss to culture as reason against this idea before, but it has never been explained what makes losing a language so culturally devastating.)
Sure there are translated copies, but they lose a lot of meaning in translation. Each letter has it's own spiritual meaning that is lost.
Hold on...I won't disagree that many countries don't exactly love America. However, you'd be switching to English, not American. Surely the hatred would need to be focused on England for this to really be a problem. Unless of course, you're trying to say English was invented by America?Alkarin said:Well most countries believe they are better than america and some just flat out despise America (Especially Middle eastern countries due to their religious views) and they would find it as Americanism being imposed upon them and they would have none of it.
Many languages have special words and meanings. Not everything is perfectly portable from language to language.Azeban said:It seems awfully inefficient to have to learn how to express the same concept in multiple ways. I wouldn't even care if it wasn't English, because I recognize that many more people speak Mandarin.
no im saying most people arent that understanding about things and try to make up reasons to hate others more. its more of a scapegoat for violence then an actual insult in itself. afterall english is the offical language of the united states and people are going to refer it as biased towards them for whatever reasonsTerribleTerryTate said:Hold on...I won't disagree that many countries don't exactly love America. However, you'd be switching to English, not American. Surely the hatred would need to be focused on England for this to really be a problem. Unless of course, you're trying to say English was invented by America?Alkarin said:Well most countries believe they are better than america and some just flat out despise America (Especially Middle eastern countries due to their religious views) and they would find it as Americanism being imposed upon them and they would have none of it.
I couldn't agree more. I understand what you mean now. Good points.Alkarin said:no im saying most people arent that understanding about things and try to make up reasons to hate others more. its more of a scapegoat for violence then an actual insult in itselfTerribleTerryTate said:Hold on...I won't disagree that many countries don't exactly love America. However, you'd be switching to English, not American. Surely the hatred would need to be focused on England for this to really be a problem. Unless of course, you're trying to say English was invented by America?Alkarin said:Well most countries believe they are better than america and some just flat out despise America (Especially Middle eastern countries due to their religious views) and they would find it as Americanism being imposed upon them and they would have none of it.
well i believe they want english speakers more due to the fact that mostly westernized countries buy goods (well all countries do but you get my point) and they see more money out of dealing with capitalist countries then say communist china which speaks mandarinAntiAntagonist said:Many languages have special words and meanings. Not everything is perfectly portable from language to language.Azeban said:It seems awfully inefficient to have to learn how to express the same concept in multiple ways. I wouldn't even care if it wasn't English, because I recognize that many more people speak Mandarin.
Having multiple languages doesn't always have concrete advantages. However there are exceptions.
The current lingua franca is English. The language "preference" came about due to many factors, mostly geographic, colonial, political and economic.
Arbitrary language specification would be pointless at this time. In my opinion geography/travel is not accessible/cheap enough for this measure to be fully effective.
Also English use is more widespread than Mandarin. International businesses usually often prefer employees with English experience.
yes i would assume so. but eventually have local languages deteriorate imo. and if anything to avoid further violence and arguments we should have scholars create a new language.takagi said:I think the best we can hope for is for one language to be used as an international language, while everyone learns their native tongue for local communication.......
Thanks for the cookie. However, after re-reading your initial post I still stand by what I said. Plus, how would a single global language be attainable? Centuries of history, and to a certain extent culture would need to be overlooked and completely ignored for this to be a possibility.Azeban said:Meh, I'm one of those nutjobs who believes that a really old book is not the secret to spirituality.naftali1 said:Losing a language could be religiously devastating more than culturally. For example, if Hebrew was lost there is no way to study the Torah because a Torah scroll has to be written in Hebrew.Azeban said:(I've heard the major loss to culture as reason against this idea before, but it has never been explained what makes losing a language so culturally devastating.)
Sure there are translated copies, but they lose a lot of meaning in translation. Each letter has it's own spiritual meaning that is lost.
Wow, you didn't read my post before commenting. Here's your cookie.TerribleTerryTate said:Variety is the spice of life. I love the fact going to a new country means a new culture and language. I'm going to guess you mean switch to English too? How would you feel if it was somehow decided we'd all have to speak Chinese, or Russian? I'm going to guess your opinion on a global language might change a bit.